Dwindling productivity in Congress linked to vanishing cooperation

April 30, 2015, Pennsylvania State University

As the number of bills passed by Congress declines, fewer and fewer Congressional representatives are voting across party lines, leaving only a few key representatives as collaborative voters, according to researchers.

"We can't say for sure that the decline in cooperation is the sole reason that there are fewer bills being introduced or passed by Congress, but we do know the two are statistically correlated, and both have been dropping steadily over the past 60 years," said Clio Andris, lead author and assistant professor of geography at Penn State.

The researchers tracked roll call data—the record of whether Congressional representatives abstained or voted "yay" or "nay" on motions or bills—on every vote, beginning in 1949—the start of the 81st Congress—and continuing through 2012—the end of the 112th Congress. The researchers then identified all times when a representative voted with members of the opposite party, referred to as a cross-party pair, or with members of the same party, referred to as a same-party pair.

The findings show that the number of cross-party votes decreased at an exponentially higher rate than same-party votes. From 1967 to 1979, there were more than 10,000 instances of representatives voting across party lines. From 2001 to 2010, there were fewer than 1,500 of these cooperative votes.

The findings also show that far fewer representatives today engage in cross-party voting than in the past. "If you look at past data, it was uncharacteristic that one representative would be involved in even 1 percent of the total cross-party voting, because people were more likely to vote against party lines. Today, several people account for upwards of 50 percent of the total cross-party votes, and these are the people we refer to as 'super-cooperators' because they account for a bulk of the cross-aisle voting," said Andris.

In the 112th Congress, 7 of the 444 members accounted for 98.3 percent of cross-party pairs, which indicates that the majority of representatives vote with their party members only. This study was the first to analyze congressional role call voting using a network model, and this approach allowed the researchers to identify patterns at the individual level.

"Our original goal was to try to identify 'hidden partnerships' among Congressional representatives and to understand whether geography played a role in any of those bonds. Surprisingly, we found that geography had very little influence over how representatives voted. You might think that issues around land resource management or tourism might be affected by local geographies, but that's not the case," said Andris. "What we're seeing now is that, more and more, party platforms are the determining factor for how the majority of representatives are voting."

The researchers published their findings in the April 21 issue of the journal PLOS ONE.

Explore further: Study: Polarization in Congress is worsening... and it stifles policy innovation

Related Stories

Female candidates get fewer votes: Study

November 21, 2007

Female candidates get fewer votes, according to ANU research released today that analysed the performance of nearly 17,000 candidates who ran for the House of Representatives between 1903 and 2004.

Recommended for you

Research helps students excel on science exams

January 15, 2019

A new study released today reveals that helping lower-income high school freshman to regulate their test-taking anxiety can cut their biology course failure rates in half. The study, published in Proceedings of the National ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (4) Apr 30, 2015
This polarization of the congress is the direct result of the adoption of the "Southern Strategy" by the Republican party thirty plus years ago.

They decided to split the nation using race at first but grabbing every opportunity to position their base in opposition to the popular will and to government.

As a nation, a society, and even as individuals, Americans are paying (and will continue to pay) a high price for the strategy.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Apr 30, 2015
Makes ya wonder, doesn't it....
2 / 5 (4) Apr 30, 2015
Why is creating more govt programs ('productivity') that plunder our wealth and destroy the economy a good thing?
1 / 5 (2) May 01, 2015
This article is hilariously ignorant. There doesn't need to be any 'cooperation' when both parties are merely different facets of the same turd.
2 / 5 (4) May 03, 2015
The author assumes more passed bills is productivity. I agree if he means that by passing more bills, politicians are creating more ways for them to use government force to rob from the productive for their own power and wealth.

IMHO, his article is good news, contrary to his assumptions.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.