Amazon rainforest losses impact on climate change, study shows

April 21, 2015, University of Edinburgh
Solimões, the section of the upper Amazon River. Image: Wikipedia.

Human activity has removed more than one-tenth of trees and plants from the Amazon rainforest since the 1960s, a study shows.

Widespread removal of trees has contributed to a rise in the amount of in the atmosphere, increasing the potential impact of , researchers say.

Deforestation of the Amazon accounted for 1.5 per cent of the increase in carbon dioxide levels seen since the mid-nineteenth century, the team says.

However, this increased the total amount of carbon found in the atmosphere only very slightly compared with , which account for the vast majority of the increase.

Had this deforestation not taken place, the rainforest would store 12 per cent more carbon in its vegetation, and cover a much larger area than at present, the team adds.

The study is the first to show the extent of Amazon deforestation by determining the impact humans have had on the ability of the rainforest to store carbon.

Trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to grow. This can help offset fossil fuel emissions of carbon dioxide, reducing the rate of climate change, the team says.

The team made maps to show what size the Amazon would be today if humans had not deforested large areas of it.

High-resolution satellite images have been available only since 2000, so the team made virtual models to work out how the rainforest changed in earlier decades. Researchers used these to study how the loss of trees reduced the rainforest's ability to store carbon.

Destruction of large areas of the Amazon also impacts on the biodiversity of the rainforest and could lead to the loss of many animal and plant species, researchers say.

The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council.

Dr Jean-François Exbrayat, of the University of Edinburgh's School of GeoSciences, who led the research, said: "Our study indicates that the impact of large-scale deforestation on the Amazon carbon balance has been partially offset by ongoing regrowth of vegetation, despite sustained . Overall, our results provide a baseline to better understand the ."

Explore further: Amazon's carbon uptake declines as trees die faster

Related Stories

Amazon's carbon uptake declines as trees die faster

March 18, 2015

The most extensive land-based study of the Amazon to date reveals it is losing its capacity to absorb carbon from the atmosphere. From a peak of two billion tonnes of carbon dioxide each year in the 1990s, the net uptake ...

Recommended for you

Meteorite source in asteroid belt not a single debris field

February 17, 2019

A new study published online in Meteoritics and Planetary Science finds that our most common meteorites, those known as L chondrites, come from at least two different debris fields in the asteroid belt. The belt contains ...

Diagnosing 'art acne' in Georgia O'Keeffe's paintings

February 17, 2019

Even Georgia O'Keeffe noticed the pin-sized blisters bubbling on the surface of her paintings. For decades, conservationists and scholars assumed these tiny protrusions were grains of sand, kicked up from the New Mexico desert ...

Archaeologists discover Incan tomb in Peru

February 16, 2019

Peruvian archaeologists discovered an Incan tomb in the north of the country where an elite member of the pre-Columbian empire was buried, one of the investigators announced Friday.

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.5 / 5 (2) Apr 21, 2015
In otherwords,, relative to "global warming," deforestation is miniscule.

What about the non-CO2 mediated thermal impacts? I would imagine it would increase infra red emissions and decrease thermal retention due to loss of local atmospheric mass (H2O).
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 22, 2015
In otherwords,, relative to "global warming," deforestation is miniscule.

What about the non-CO2 mediated thermal impacts? I would imagine it would increase infra red emissions and decrease thermal retention due to loss of local atmospheric mass (H2O).

Here's a non-CO2 knock-on impact: The atmospheric H2O (clouds) above the rain forest significantly reduces the albedo of the planet, effectively reflecting heat energy back into space. Kill the rainforest and you kill the clouds, which allows the heat energy to reach the ground, where the albedo is much lower, because the ground is darker. Like increased plankton in the Arctic, which is raising retained heat by 20% and warming the waters, which is melting the glaciers faster. 20% is bigger than 12%.

To put it simply, this is why dark colored car seat gets hotter in the sun than white seats. Listen to the wisdom of your ass.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.