Nutrient pollution damages streams in ways previously unknown, ecologists find

Nutrient pollution damages streams in ways previously unknown, ecologists find
David Manning, a University of Georgia doctoral student, and John Kominoski, a former UGA postdoctoral researcher who is now an assistant professor at Florida International University, perform maintenance on the pump used to add nutrients to one of the streams in their experiment. Credit: Jon Benstead/University of Alabama

An important food resource has been disappearing from streams without anyone noticing until now.

In a new study published March 6 in the journal Science, a team of researchers led by University of Georgia ecologists reports that causes a significant loss of forest-derived from stream ecosystems, reducing the ability of to support aquatic life.

The findings show that the in-stream residence time of carbon from leaves, twigs and other forest matter, which provide much of the energy that fuels stream , is cut in half when moderate amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus are added to a stream.

"This study shows how excess nutrients reduce stream health in a way that was previously unknown," said the study's lead author Amy D. Rosemond, an associate professor in the UGA Odum School of Ecology.

Stream food webs are based on carbon from two main sources. One is algae, which produce carbon through photosynthesis. Nutrient pollution has long been known to increase carbon production by algae, often causing nuisance and . The second source is leaves and bits of wood from streamside forests. This forest-derived carbon typically persists year-round, making it a staple food resource for stream organisms.

"Most people think of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in streams as contributing to algae blooms," said Diane Pataki, program director in the National Science Foundation's Division of Environmental Biology, which funded the research. "But streams contain a lot of leaf litter, and this study shows that nutrient pollution can also stimulate carbon losses from streams by accelerating the breakdown of that litter. That helps us better understand how fertilizer runoff affects carbon transport and emissions from streams and rivers."

Nitrogen and phosphorus play essential roles in the breakdown of carbon by microbes and stream-dwelling insects and other invertebrates, but cause problems when they are present in excessive amounts—as they increasingly are. Nutrient pollution is widespread in the U.S. and globally, due primarily to land use changes like deforestation, agriculture and urbanization.

Nutrient pollution damages streams in ways previously unknown, ecologists find
Forest-derived carbon, such as leaves and wood, provides essential ecosystem services in streams. The effects of nutrient pollution on this carbon source are poorly understood compared to the well-known effects of nutrients on algae. Credit: Phillip M. Bumpers/University of Georgia

Nutrient pollution's effects on algal carbon are well known and highly visible in the form of algal blooms. Little was known about how nutrient pollution affects forest-derived carbon in stream food webs, so Rosemond and her colleagues devised a set of experiments to find out.

Working at the Coweeta Hydrological Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research site in North Carolina, they set up a system to continuously add nutrients to several small headwater streams. The first experiment ran for six years in two streams, and the second for three years in five streams, with different combinations of nitrogen and phosphorus to mimic the effects of different land uses.

The researchers found that the additional nutrients reduced forest-derived carbon in whole stream reaches by half.

"We were frankly shocked at how quickly leaves disappeared when we added nutrients," said Rosemond. "By summer, the streams looked unnaturally bare."

"It's very apparent when lead to in rivers and other aquatic ecosystems," said study co-author Jon Benstead, an associate professor of biological sciences at the University of Alabama. "But their impact on accelerating the breakdown of dead organic matter, such as leaves and twigs, is a significant but under-appreciated effect on the health of freshwater ecosystems across large areas of the world."

Rosemond likened the impact of the loss of forest-derived carbon to the doubling of algal carbon that nutrient pollution can cause.

Nutrient pollution damages streams in ways previously unknown, ecologists find
The researchers maintained additions of nitrogen and phosphorus to streams year-round, including during snowy winter months. Credit: Phillip M. Bumpers/University of Georgia
"But this is not a zero-sum game," she said. "Increasing one form of carbon and decreasing another does not equate; these resources have unique roles in stream food webs and nutrients are affecting their relative availability."

Many streams lack sufficient light for algae to grow, making forest-derived carbon their main source of energy. But forest-derived carbon is more than a source of food.

"Leaves and twigs and the microbes that live on them are also particularly important in taking up pollutants like nitrogen and phosphorus," Rosemond said. "Ironically, by stimulating the loss of these resources with nutrients, we lose a lot of their capacity to reduce the nutrients' effects. This means that more nutrients head downstream where they can cause problems in lakes and estuaries."

Rosemond said she hopes the study's findings will be incorporated into policies aimed at reducing nutrient pollution, which currently focus on algae.

"There has been limited national progress in efforts to reduce the impact of nutrient pollution in the U.S., according to a U.S. Geological Survey study," she said. "Our results provide a more complete picture of nutrient effects in streams, suggesting that increased efforts at addressing their impacts can now improve stream health in more than one way."


Explore further

Algae blooms create their own favorable conditions, study finds

More information: Experimental nutrient additions accelerate terrestrial carbon loss from stream ecosystems, Science, www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/ … 1126/science.aaa1958
Journal information: Science

Citation: Nutrient pollution damages streams in ways previously unknown, ecologists find (2015, March 5) retrieved 25 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-03-nutrient-pollution-streams-ways-previously.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
76 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 05, 2015
Great study. I conducted (as a Business student compelled to meet an underlying science requisite) a stream study that included the college campus. It was basically a measure of nitrogen/phosphate loading as the creek flowed from a protected park land, through exclusive golf courses, a historical municipal park with legacy lavish estates, and into and through campus. The creek literally "died" after it left campus and was no longer visible as a stream; choked with anaerobic bacteria, urban street sludge, car parts, trash and dead mammals.

My lay study was indictment of mono-culture, added-nutrient-demanding turf and lawns, we suspected. The professor later published my results as his own, claiming as a business student I had "no credibility."

Mar 05, 2015
Well, I know one thing. If someone could figure out a way to keep the stuff from washing into streams the farmers involved would be very happy. Their cost would go down and the steams would be in better shape at the same time.

t_garr, there is a small lake about 2 acres right down the road from me that also has a problem. The small park it's in is mostly surrounded by people with big houses and fancy lawns IE.. well fertilized. The lake gets the runoff every year. It used to be clear enough to see 6' to the bottom in most of it... now it's just green algae most of the time and it's pretty much killed off all the fish in it.

Mar 06, 2015
If someone could figure out a way to keep the stuff from washing into streams the farmers involved would be very happy
@24volts
very true
in fact, i can tell you that studies are underway (and have been for more than 15 years) on just that subject
If you look at the more progressive states that incorporate technology as well as push environmental issues, you can see lots of funded studies
Look for "best management practices" as well as "riparian" or water quality studies

one progressive state is (believe it or not) Arkansas as you can see here: http://www.uaex.e...9517.pdf

they've been addressing this stuff since at least the 1990's (see ref's)
http://portal.nif...ity.html

Mar 06, 2015
Thanks, those are interesting and informative links. It's good to see people are actually trying to do something worthwhile about the problem.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more