Study tests motivational techniques

January 22, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Every year, U.S. companies spend billions on incentives for salespeople, and although incentives can help boost sales figures, the associated costs cut into the bottom line in a big way.

Noah Lim, an associate marketing professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Wisconsin School of Business, is shedding light on sales incentives that could help managers devise incentive programs with better returns on investment.

Lim and Hua Chen, an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Mississippi School of Business Administration, set up a series of experiments with two-person teams and individual to ask a simple question: Do group incentives actually work?

The answer: Lim found that under the right circumstances, incentives for a team outperform incentives given to individuals.

The finding challenges conventional economic wisdom, which suggests that group incentives allow some sales agents to get a "free ride" on the efforts of others in the group. Salespeople often push back against group incentive plans and are sometimes uncomfortable when their commissions and compensation are contingent on the efforts of others.

"Salespeople are individualistic in nature, so group incentives often represent a big change for them," Lim says.

The effectiveness of group incentives depends on three factors, according to Lim. These factors include the sales team's social connectedness, the design of the incentives and the type of informational feedback they receive.  

When two-person teams were allowed to socialize briefly, they increased their commitment to the group incentives, which led to better sales results. These socialized two-person teams outperformed other individuals, as well as two-person groups that did not initially socialize face-to-face.

Group incentives also worked better when individual performance counted more than the performance of the group. "You want to design a system where most of your reward still comes from your own work," says Lim. Still, the group component must be significant enough for members to feel dependent on each other.   

And in terms of informational feedback, Lim found that less might be more. When socialized group members received feedback on how hard their teammates were working, their own effort surprisingly diminished. Lim suggests that when feedback about effort is unavailable, may worry that their own contributions will be underestimated by their teammates. Consequently, they may work harder to guarantee better results to avoid the prospect of letting each other down.

Lim says group incentives may not work the same for groups larger than two, since individuals may not feel as personally connected to all of their teammates. However, the desire to uphold a positive reputation may also motivate individuals to work harder out of a fear of letting down a larger number of people.

Explore further: Small cash rewards pay off in weight loss plans

More information: Noah Lim and Hua Chen (2014) When Do Group Incentives for Salespeople Work?. Journal of Marketing Research: June 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 320-334. journals.ama.org/doi/abs/10.15 … 322?journalCode=jmkr

Related Stories

Small cash rewards pay off in weight loss plans

November 20, 2014

People who received small cash bonuses for their degree of participation in an Internet weight loss program shed more pounds than those who were not offered bonuses and they kept much of the weight off, according to a new ...

Guidance offered for ethical referrals within ACOs

January 15, 2015

(HealthDay)—For accountable care organizations (ACOs), referrals within the ACO can be ethical as long as their selection is influenced in a manner that is transparent, with appropriate metrics and the right incentives, ...

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

NASA instruments image fireball over Bering Sea

March 22, 2019

On Dec. 18, 2018, a large "fireball—the term used for exceptionally bright meteors that are visible over a wide area—exploded about 16 miles (26 kilometers) above the Bering Sea. The explosion unleashed an estimated 173 ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.