Sustainability challenged as many renewable resources max out

The days of assuming natural resources can be swapped in and out to solve shortages - corn for oil, soy for beef - may be over. An international group of scientists demonstrate that many key resources have peaked in productivity, pointing to the sobering conclusion that "renewable" is not synonymous with "unlimited."

Scientists from Michigan State University (MSU), the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Germany and Yale University analyzed the production and extraction rates of 27 global renewable and non-. They examined 20 renewable resources, such as corn, rice, wheat or soy, which represent around 45 percent of the global calorie intake according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, as well as animal products, such as fish, meat, milk and eggs.

The annual of 18 of these renewable resources - for example, increase in meat production or fish catch—peaked around 2006.

The results were published in the latest issue of the international journal Ecology and Society, and featured in the journal Nature's Research Highlights this week.

For Jianguo "Jack" Liu, who is director of MSU's Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, this is strong reason for integration—to approach sustainability problems holistically, rather than searching for a "one for one" substitution to offset shortages.

"People often talk about substitution. If we run out of one resource, we just substitute another. But if multiple resources are running out, we've got a problem," Liu said.

Scientists addressing the issue of peak were Liu, Rachel Carson Chair in Sustainability at MSU, landscape ecologists Ralf Seppelt, Ameur Manceur and plant ecologist Stefan Klotz from UFZ, and Yale economist Eli Fenichel.

The researchers used a global dataset and made limited assumptions, relying on computer power to extract pattern from the database.

Surprisingly, they discovered not only that 20 resources had a peak-year but also that for 16 of the 20 resources with a peak year, the peak year lay between 1988 and 2008—a narrow range in the history of mankind.

"The key commodities that a person needs for food and must harvest are limited", said Seppelt, who leads the UFZ Landscape Ecology Department.

Renewable resources become scarcer. The authors were able to illustrate this using various examples: The maximum global growth rate in crop yields for soybeans was in 2009, for milk it was 2004, for eggs it was 1993 and for the fish caught it was 1988. Data from other studies confirm these results. For example, the crop yield per area with corn, wheat, soy and rice on more than a quarter of the farming area around the world is stagnating or decreasing, according to the U.S. scientists.

There are several reasons why many of the peak years occurred during the same time period or "synchronized," Liu said.

First, multiple resources such as land, food and energy, are consumed simultaneously to meet different needs of rapidly growing populations and diet changes worldwide. Second, producing one resource needs other resources. For example, food production needs land, energy and water. Third, producing resources creates pollution, which exacerbates resource shortages. Fourth, extracting less accessible resources results in an increased ecological and economic cost per unit extracted, thus lowering the availability of the remaining resources.

"Experts see opportunities for further increases in agricultural yield of about one to two percent per year due to better breeding techniques and genetically modified organisms," Seppelt said. "Mankind needs to accept that are also reaching their yield limits worldwide".

Liu said this does not speak to hopelessness. Rather, it's a call to not be simplistic when seeking solutions and to acknowledge that all resources come with costs, and that the costs may not be immediately obvious, and span the globe.

"The world is now tightly telecoupled," Liu said "To produce one thing you need multiple resources often at distances, and we ignore that at our peril."


Explore further

Wave energy integration costs should compare favorably to other energy sources

Journal information: Ecology and Society , Nature

Citation: Sustainability challenged as many renewable resources max out (2015, January 14) retrieved 25 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-01-sustainability-renewable-resources-max.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
61 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 14, 2015
Well...

The MIT, in it's study "The Limits to Growth", calculated in the '70s, that Food per Capita would peak around 2015...

That was in a scenario called "Business as usual" where we didn't heed warnings and did NOTHING to change society, finance and business.

We didn't do anything, so that's what we're getting.

By the way, that study by the MIT is periodically confronted to new data as it becomes available, and so far, the '70s calculations are spot on for the "Business as usual" scenario.

According to the calculations, our insane "Age of Garbage" civilization should collapse around the 2030 years, and so far, we're right on course...

Jan 14, 2015
The MIT, in it's study "The Limits to Growth", calculated in the '70s, that Food per Capita would peak around 2015...
That didnt take into account the enormous impact that family planning and ABORTION have had worldwide.

ONE BILLION abortions since the end of ww2 and their descendants to 2 and 3 generations were never born. A similar number were never conceived due to education and contraception. Perhaps 1/4 of the worlds population never had the chance to exist, to consume, to fight, to starve, and to die in misery.
http://www.johnst...313.html

-And yet in many regions, religion-fueled overpopulation still causes these conditions.

Jan 14, 2015
The writers fail to counter with the fact that integration of alternatives and holistic practices have yet to become major influences in these trends. The ideas of brute-forcing Nature and force-feeding her with chemical stimulants is neither rational nor sustainable. Working with her will help us survive, not any of our brute-force inventions.

Jan 14, 2015
@ TheGhostofOtto1923

- "That didnt take into account the enormous impact that family planning and ABORTION have had worldwide."

That impact is minimal, population growth is still as predicted.

Go here to see a graph of the 1970's calculations with data up to 2000 added. Numbers match very closely..:
http://www.smiths...5269840/

Jan 14, 2015
From the article;
Surprisingly, they discovered not only that 20 resources had a peak-year but also that for 16 of the 20 resources with a peak year, the peak year lay between 1988 and 2008—a narrow range in the history of mankind.

And;
The maximum global growth rate in crop yields for soybeans was in 2009, for milk it was 2004, for eggs it was 1993 and for the fish caught it was 1988.

Which kind of shows the stress that the human population is putting on the planet,

Jan 15, 2015
"Something MUST be done!" snicker...

Jan 15, 2015
Can petepal justify his silly post?

Perhaps he can tell us why nothing need be done.

Jan 17, 2015
We are screwing ourselves out of our world, literally!!

Jan 18, 2015
@ petepal55

- "Something MUST be done!" snicker...

If "snicker" means NOTHING will be done, you're right.

We'll keep marching to extinction, to the sound of cash registers.

As the 2030s get closer, we'll push desperate laws on carbon, renewables and "green" stuff, but it's too late anyway.

We were warned in the 70s, we didn't do anything significant or meaningful, we're going the way of the Dodo.

Period.

Good luck to our children and grandchildren. Push them to learn useful skills...

Wall Street trader isn't one of them.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more