Want to feed the world? Tackle pollution from ozone and soot

November 4, 2014 by Zongbo Shi, The Conversation
Air pollution is harming India’s wheat farmers. Credit: EPA

Researchers have long known that man-made climate change will harm yields of important crops, possibly causing problems for the world's food security. But new research shows air pollution doesn't just harm crops indirectly through climate change; it seems to harm them directly.

Pollution from soot and ozone has caused a major decrease of in India, with some densely populated states experiencing 50% relative yield losses. To ensure the world has enough food, we need to look directly at air pollution.

Jennifer Burney and Veerabhadran Ramanathan from the University of California, San Diego systematically investigated the impact of air pollution and anthropogenic climate change on crops in India, where yields have levelled off or decreased in recent decades despite continued improvements in agricultural technology. Their study showed that overall air pollution has caused a third of loss in wheat yield and one fifth of loss in rice yield in India in 2010, using 1980 as a baseline. Their findings are published in the journal Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences.

Many previous works have studied the impact of climate change on crop yield. However, this new study suggests that air pollution from ozone and soot caused far more loss of crop yield than climate change. From 1980 to 2010, the increase in temperature and change in precipitation as a result of anthropogenic climate change has caused a 3.5% decrease in wheat yield on a country level in India. However, air pollution has caused more than 32% decrease in wheat yield during the same period.

Blame pollution not climate for declining wheat yields:

Relative wheat yield changes, India, 1980-2010. Credit: Burney & Ramanathan

How it works

Soot – or black carbon – is emitted mainly from burning plants and fossil fuels. It directly absorbs sunlight, reducing the amount of light available for crops to photosynthesise. Black carbon alone has caused more damage to Indian wheat yields than .

Ozone is a gas formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions of precursors including nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. NOx are mainly generated from fossil fuel combustion while VOCs are emitted from both natural sources and human activities.

Ozone damages crops by entering leaves during normal gas exchange. As a strong oxidant, ozone causes symptoms in crops such as yellowing, cell injury, tiny light-tan irregular spots, bronzing, and reddening. This directly affects the growth of crops and thus reduces their yield.

Ozone is the key pollutant causing the yield loss of crops, for example wheat, which is very sensitive to ozone exposure. Ozone exposure could have an even bigger impact on yields of soybean, peanut and cotton.

The picture is unlikely to improve any time soon. My colleague William Bloss, an expert in atmospheric chemistry, points out that background ozone levels have approximately doubled since the earliest measurements (performed near Paris in the 1870s). "Looking to the future", he says, "models predict that ground level ozone will continue to rise in many areas of the world". Ozone pollution will continue to be a major challenge for .

Want to feed the world? Tackle pollution from ozone and soot
The effects of ozone on soybeans. Credit: NASA

It is important to note that there are significant regional variations in the crop yield loss in India, with some states seeing more than 50% losses in wheat yield, mainly due to air pollution. This has significant implications for other developing countries, in particular China.

Since the emission of and ozone precursors is significantly larger in China than in India, the impact of air pollution on Chinese agriculture is expected to be even larger than that in India. China is now the world's largest food importer. Could in China have led to the thirst for food in the global market?

Fortunately and black carbon have short atmospheric lifetimes (unlike some greenhouse gases which can linger for decades or centuries). This means there is a strong, direct benefit to addressing such pollution, and it would be apparently relatively soon.

Explore further: Climate change and air pollution will combine to curb food supplies

More information: "Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture." PNAS 2014 ; published ahead of print November 3, 2014, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317275111

Related Stories

An up-close look at what air pollution is doing to your body

October 17, 2014

We are all aware that air pollution can be bad for our health – the World Health Organisation estimated that ambient air pollution caused 3.7 million premature deaths worldwide in 2012 – yet what exactly happens to your ...

Climate change increases the risk of ozone damage to plants

June 30, 2011

Ground-level ozone is an air pollutant that harms humans and plants. Both climate and weather play a major role in ozone damage to plants. Researchers at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, have now shown that climate change ...

Recommended for you

'Warm' ice in world's highest glacier

November 21, 2018

Ice temperatures inside the world's highest glacier on the slopes of Mount Everest are warmer than expected and especially vulnerable to future climate change, warn glaciologists.

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JoeBlue
2.5 / 5 (2) Nov 04, 2014
All of these predictions yet we are still throwing away 50% of the food that we grow.
cjn
5 / 5 (2) Nov 04, 2014
We can't ignore that this is in India, and that there may be a large number of factors impacting field productivity. In a state with that level of population density and lax pollution regulation, one shouldn't be surprised to see an ecological impact following decades of massive industrialization. I would have like to have seen comparisons of the impact of less-than-conservative ag practices, non-carbon/O3 atmospheric pollution, and waterway/ground water pollution with respect to the factors explored.

I'm glad that the researchers are evaluating the factors with their relative influences. This will be the best way to effect an important change in necessary time.
nevermark
5 / 5 (5) Nov 04, 2014
JoeBlue, food spoils, it needs costly energy to be transported, etc. As a result, it is often more economical to throw away food than it is to try and transport it. It would be cheaper to subsidize local farmers than to try and transport every last bit of unused food.

In other words, the problem is a lot more complex than simply avoiding throwing out food.
kris2lee
1 / 5 (1) Nov 04, 2014
This work is meaningless without attempt to take birth rates under control. Having birth rate under control allows society to grow wealth instead of wasting it for unsustainable offspring production.
gkam
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 04, 2014
This pollution comes from fossil fuels. It is time to evolve our power systems away from the dirty fuels of the Industrial Revolution. It's over.
kris2lee
3.3 / 5 (3) Nov 04, 2014
@gkam Natural gas burs very cleanly without much soot with a right type of burner. Wood, a renewable material, burns with a lot of soot.

TegiriNenashi
not rated yet Nov 04, 2014
Something other than "climate change" is causing things? I wonder what kind of journalist climate fatigue (or restored BS meter?) finally triggered a flow of articles in that direction.
Rustybolts
not rated yet Nov 05, 2014
Don't worry, Monsanto will alter it to live with soot and pollutions.
Ulg
not rated yet Nov 05, 2014
@kris2lee I suppose the extraction is clean too? No problem that the radon levels are very high in natural gas either as they are not regulated right?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.