Fermi satellite finds hints of starquakes in magnetar 'storm'

October 22, 2014, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
A rupture in the crust of a highly magnetized neutron star, shown here in an artist's rendering, can trigger high-energy eruptions. Fermi observations of these blasts include information on how the star's surface twists and vibrates, providing new insights into what lies beneath. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/S. Wiessinger

(Phys.org) —NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detected a rapid-fire "storm" of high-energy blasts from a highly magnetized neutron star, also called a magnetar, on Jan. 22, 2009. Now astronomers analyzing this data have discovered underlying signals related to seismic waves rippling throughout the magnetar.

Such signals were first identified during the fadeout of rare giant flares produced by magnetars. Over the past 40 years, giant flares have been observed just three times—in 1979, 1998 and 2004—and signals related to starquakes, which set the ringing like a bell, were identified only in the two most recent events.

"Fermi's Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has captured the same evidence from smaller and much more frequent eruptions called bursts, opening up the potential for a wealth of new data to help us understand how neutron stars are put together," said Anna Watts, an astrophysicist at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and co-author of a new study about the burst storm. "It turns out that Fermi's GBM is the perfect tool for this work."

Neutron stars are the densest, most magnetic and fastest-spinning objects in the universe that scientists can observe directly. Each one is the crushed core of a massive star that ran out of fuel, collapsed under its own weight, and exploded as a supernova. A neutron star packs the equivalent mass of half-a-million Earths into a sphere about 12 miles across, roughly the length of Manhattan Island in New York City.

While typical neutron stars possess magnetic fields trillions of times stronger than Earth's, the eruptive activity observed from magnetars requires fields 1,000 times stronger still. To date, astronomers have confirmed only 23 magnetars.

In the midst of SGR J1550-5418's 2009 burst storm, Swift's X-Ray Telescope captured an expanding halo produced by the magnetar's brightest bursts. The rings formed as X-rays from the brightest bursts scattered off of intervening dust clouds. Clouds closer to Earth produced larger rings. Credit: NASA/Swift/Jules Halpern, Columbia University

Because a neutron star's solid crust is locked to its intense , a disruption of one immediately affects the other. A fracture in the crust will lead to a reshuffling of the magnetic field, or a sudden reorganization of the magnetic field may instead crack the surface. Either way, the changes trigger a sudden release of stored energy via powerful bursts that vibrate the crust, a motion that becomes imprinted on the burst's gamma-ray and X-ray signals.

It takes an incredible amount of energy to convulse a neutron star. The closest comparison on Earth is the 9.5-magnitude Chilean earthquake of 1960, which ranks as the most powerful ever recorded on the standard scale used by seismologists. On that scale, said Watts, a starquake associated with a magnetar giant flare would reach magnitude 23.

The 2009 burst storm came from SGR J1550−5418, an object discovered by NASA's Einstein Observatory, which operated from 1978 to 1981. Located about 15,000 light-years away in the constellation Norma, the magnetar was quiet until October 2008, when it entered a period of eruptive activity that ended in April 2009. At times, the object produced hundreds of bursts in as little as 20 minutes, and the most intense explosions emitted more total energy than the sun does in 20 years. High-energy instruments on many spacecraft, including NASA's Swift and Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, detected hundreds of gamma-ray and X-ray blasts.

Speaking at the Fifth Fermi International Symposium in Nagoya, Japan, on Oct. 21, Watts said the new study examined 263 individual bursts detected by Fermi's GBM and confirms vibrations in the frequency ranges previously seen in giant flares. "We think these are likely twisting oscillations of the star where the crust and the core, bound by the super-strong magnetic field, are vibrating together," she explained. "We also found, in a single burst, an oscillation at a frequency never seen before and which we still do not understand."

A key element of the research is a new analysis technique developed by University of Amsterdam researcher Daniela Huppenkothen. Normally scientists search for oscillations in high-energy data by looking for variations aligned to a particular frequency. Such methods are best suited for finding a strong signal with little competition rather than a faint signal immersed in a bright and rapidly changing environment, such as a burst.

This image of NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, shown here in May 2008 being readied for launch, highlights the spacecraft's instruments. The Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an array of 14 crystal detectors sensitive to short-lived gamma-ray blasts. Credit: NASA/Jim Grossmann

Huppenkothen likens the problem to detecting ripples from a stone tossed into a quiet pond. "Now imagine you're in the middle of the North Atlantic during a storm, searching for those ripples amidst huge waves in a churning sea," she explained. "Our old methods really weren't appropriate for this, but I have in effect developed a way of accounting for the rough sea so we can find ripples even in stormy conditions."

A paper describing the research, which was led by Huppenkothen, appeared in the June 1 edition of The Astrophysical Journal.

While there are many efforts to describe the interiors of neutron stars, scientists lack enough observational detail to choose between differing models. Neutron stars reach densities far beyond the reach of laboratories and their interiors may exceed the density of an atomic nucleus by as much as 10 times. Knowing more about how bursts shake up these stars will give theorists an important new window into understanding their internal structure.

"Right now," added Watts, "we are waiting for more bursts—and if we're lucky, a giant flare—to take advantage of GBM's excellent capabilities."

Explore further: A hidden population of exotic neutron stars

More information: Paper: "Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in Short Recurring Bursts of the Soft-Gamma Repeater J1550-5418"

Paper: "Quasi-Periodic Oscillations and Broadband Variability in Short Magnetar Bursts"

Related Stories

A hidden population of exotic neutron stars

May 23, 2013

(Phys.org) —Magnetars – the dense remains of dead stars that erupt sporadically with bursts of high-energy radiation - are some of the most extreme objects known in the Universe. A major campaign using NASA's Chandra ...

A magnetic monster's dual personality

July 16, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Is it a magnetar or is it a pulsar? A second member of a rare breed of dead, spinning star has been identified thanks to an armada of space-based X-ray telescopes, including ESA’s XMM-Newton. Its curious ...

Magnetar discovered close to supernova remnant Kesteven 79

September 1, 2014

(Phys.org) —Massive stars end their lives with a bang, exploding as supernovas and releasing massive amounts of energy and matter. What remains of the star is a small and extremely dense remnant: a neutron star or a black ...

Recommended for you

Magnetized inflow accreting to center of Milky Way galaxy

August 17, 2018

Are magnetic fields an important guiding force for gas accreting to a supermassive black hole (SMBH) like the one that our Milky Way galaxy hosts? The role of magnetic fields in gas accretion is little understood, and trying ...

First science with ALMA's highest-frequency capabilities

August 17, 2018

The ALMA telescope in Chile has transformed how we see the universe, showing us otherwise invisible parts of the cosmos. This array of incredibly precise antennas studies a comparatively high-frequency sliver of radio light: ...

Another way for stellar-mass black holes to grow larger

August 17, 2018

A trio of researchers with The University of Hong Kong, Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics in Taiwan and Northwestern University in the U.S., has come up with an alternative theory to explain how some ...

Six things about Opportunity's recovery efforts

August 17, 2018

NASA's Opportunity rover has been silent since June 10, when a planet-encircling dust storm cut off solar power for the nearly-15-year-old rover. Now that scientists think the global dust storm is "decaying"—meaning more ...

Sprawling galaxy cluster found hiding in plain sight

August 16, 2018

MIT scientists have uncovered a sprawling new galaxy cluster hiding in plain sight. The cluster, which sits a mere 2.4 billion light years from Earth, is made up of hundreds of individual galaxies and surrounds an extremely ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Protoplasmix
4.2 / 5 (5) Oct 22, 2014
Well since nobody else is going to say it, "Neutron Repulsion".

Let me help you along. There are good reasons why no one else would say it and this abstract provides some insight as to why that is: "Neutron Repulsion" http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1499
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (3) Oct 22, 2014
Bwahahahaha! That's a good one, Proto.
thingumbobesquire
1 / 5 (3) Oct 23, 2014
Do these quakes cause galactic tsunamis? If so, how would they impact life forms?
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (4) Oct 23, 2014
Sub: Half truths and deliberate Mischief
This article can be preserved -How Scientists are ignorant about Cosmic phenomena and attempt to hide under Earthquakes or even Nuclear blasts.
Supernovas come under DMVT- magnetic Vortex Tube process forEnergy Balance. here Neutron stars showing the way-Source-Spread Function- It is an intergalactic Phenomena.
Thanks to You tube record and Oliver K. Manuel
Appeal to All: Save Earth planet and life support
vidyardhi nanduri {space Cosmology Vedas-Independant Research]
cantdrive85
1 / 5 (4) Oct 23, 2014
Magnetars, a little bit of science, a whole lot of pseudoscience and metaphysics.
Vietvet
3 / 5 (2) Oct 26, 2014
Magnetars, a little bit of science, a whole lot of pseudoscience and metaphysics.


Your ignorance is showing.
yep
1 / 5 (3) Oct 26, 2014
Funny, I think your belief in the quantum vacuum and ultra dense objects made of unstable neutrons is ignorant, but that's standard theory for you, assumptions on top of make believe.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.