Mysterious quasar sequence explained

September 10, 2014
A growing black hole, called a quasar, can be seen at the center of a faraway galaxy in this artist's concept. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Quasars are supermassive black holes that live at the center of distant massive galaxies. They shine as the most luminous beacons in the sky across the entire electromagnetic spectrum by rapidly accreting matter into their gravitationally inescapable centers. New work from Carnegie's Hubble Fellow Yue Shen and Luis Ho of the Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics (KIAA) at Peking University solves a quasar mystery that astronomers have been puzzling over for 20 years. Their work, published in the September 11 issue of Nature, shows that most observed quasar phenomena can be unified with two simple quantities: one that describes how efficiently the hole is being fed, and the other that reflects the viewing orientation of the astronomer.

Quasars display a broad range of outward appearances when viewed by astronomers, reflecting the diversity in the conditions of the regions close to their centers. But despite this variety, quasars have a surprising amount of regularity in their quantifiable physical properties, which follow well-defined trends (referred to as the "main sequence" of quasars) discovered more than 20 years ago. Shen and Ho solved a two-decade puzzle in quasar research: What unifies these properties into this main sequence?

Using the largest and most-homogeneous sample to date of over 20,000 quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, combined with several novel statistical tests, Shen and Ho were able to demonstrate that one particular property related to the accretion of the hole, called the Eddington ratio, is the driving force behind the so-called main sequence. The Eddington ratio describes the efficiency of matter fueling the black hole, the competition between the gravitational force pulling matter inward and the luminosity driving radiation outward. This push and pull between gravity and luminosity has long been suspected to be the primary driver behind the so-called main sequence, and their work at long last confirms this hypothesis.

Of additional importance, they found that the orientation of an astronomer's line-of-sight when looking down into the black hole's inner region plays a significant role in the observation of the fast-moving gas innermost to the hole, which produces the broad emission lines in quasar spectra. This changes scientists' understanding of the geometry of the line-emitting region closest to the black hole, a place called the broad-line region: the gas is distributed in a flattened, pancake-like configuration. Going forward, this will help astronomers improve their measurements of black hole masses for .

New work solves a quasar mystery that astronomers have been puzzling over for 20 years. It shows that most observed quasar phenomena can be unified with two simple quantities: one that describes how efficiently the hole is being fed, and the other that reflects the viewing orientation of the astronomer. This graph shows the distribution of about 20,000 luminous Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars in the two-dimensional space of broad line width versus FeII strength, color-coded by the strength of the narrow [OIII] line emission. The strong horizontal trend is the main sequence of quasars driven by the efficiency of the black hole accretion, while the vertical spread of broad line width is largely due to our viewing angle to the inner region of the quasar. Credit: Yue Shen

"Our findings have profound implications for quasar research. This simple unification scheme presents a pathway to better understand how accrete matter and interplay with their environments," Shen said.

"And better black hole mass measurements will benefit a variety of applications in understanding the cosmic growth of supermassive and their place in galaxy formation," Ho added.

Explore further: DRAGNs in the sky

More information: The diversity of quasars unified by accretion and orientation, Nature, dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13712

Related Stories

DRAGNs in the sky

September 9, 2014

A radio galaxy is a galaxy that emits large amounts of radio waves. They were first discovered in the 1950s, but it wasn't until the 1960s when a technique known as aperture synthesis was developed that we could resolve the ...

New type of black-hole quasar discovered

November 8, 2013

(Phys.org) —Like our Milky Way, every known large galaxy has at its center a supermassive black hole, some of which are surrounded by a super-bright disk of hot gas called a quasar—but now a research team that includes ...

Measuring the black hole environment of a quasar nucleus

October 22, 2012

(Phys.org)—Quasars are among the most powerful energy sources known—some are as luminous as one hundred thousand Milky Way galaxies. Astronomers know that quasars have massive black holes at their cores and believe that ...

Quasar observed in six separate light reflections

August 7, 2013

(Phys.org) —Quasars are active black holes—primarily from the early universe. Using a special method where you observe light that has been bent by gravity on its way through the universe, a group of physics students from ...

Quasar gas clouds: Gone, with the wind

October 1, 2012

(Phys.org)—The case of the missing quasar gas clouds has been solved by a worldwide team of astronomers, and the answer is blowin' in the wind.

Recommended for you

Stellar nursery blooms into view

December 13, 2017

The OmegaCAM camera on ESO's VLT Survey Telescope has captured this glittering view of the stellar nursery called Sharpless 29. Many astronomical phenomena can be seen in this giant image, including cosmic dust and gas clouds ...

Bright areas on Ceres suggest geologic activity

December 13, 2017

If you could fly aboard NASA's Dawn spacecraft, the surface of dwarf planet Ceres would generally look quite dark, but with notable exceptions. These exceptions are the hundreds of bright areas that stand out in images Dawn ...

Juno probes the depths of Jupiter's great red spot

December 12, 2017

Data collected by NASA's Juno spacecraft during its first pass over Jupiter's Great Red Spot in July 2017 indicate that this iconic feature penetrates well below the clouds. Other revelations from the mission include that ...

New eruptions detected in two luminous blue variables

December 12, 2017

(Phys.org)—Astronomers report the detection of new eruptions in two luminous blue variables, known as R 40 and R 110, located in the Magellanic Clouds. The finding, presented December 5 in a paper published on the arXiv ...

12 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DeliriousNeuron
1.3 / 5 (13) Sep 10, 2014
Another ad hock model based on gravity.
I swear astrophysicists are intentionally trying to take steps backwards instead of forward.
saposjoint
4.3 / 5 (11) Sep 10, 2014
It might seem so from the point of view of an illiterate.
Jeweller
1 / 5 (2) Sep 10, 2014
MY WORD ! It didn't take long this time for the insults to begin.

I laughed at that.
DeliriousNeuron
1.6 / 5 (7) Sep 10, 2014
It might seem so from the point of view of an illiterate.


Um....not really. U can keep your broken physics and jumbo crayons.
It appears you are new to Science. Don't follow blindly down the path of mainstream physics. THAT will make you illiterate.
Urgelt
4.7 / 5 (12) Sep 10, 2014
It's not fair to call DeliriousNeuron 'illiterate.' He is no such thing, as he is obviously capable of stringing together written words into complete sentences.

That is all he can do, however.

He makes the classic mistake of the crank: he thinks that because he can imagine something, it must be true. This positions him badly for any actual contributions to science, alas, which requires cogent mathematical arguments, evidence, and peer review, among other things.

It also requires, not merely falsifiability, but explanations that are 'hard to change.' This is explained brilliantly by David Deutsche:

https://www.ted.c...lanation
Solon
2.3 / 5 (7) Sep 10, 2014
I'm with you DeliriousNeuron, the theoretical black hole based on a theory of curved space-time, that's not science in my view.

Urgelt
5 / 5 (8) Sep 11, 2014
Happily, scientists decide what science is, and not you, Solon. It's not up for a vote.

There is overwhelming evidence in favor of gravity-curved space-time and black holes. For your view, we have only your preference that it not be so.
Jixo
Sep 11, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Hat1208
5 / 5 (4) Sep 11, 2014
@Jixo

WTF
FineStructureConstant
4.5 / 5 (8) Sep 11, 2014
...some closed community
your definition. Science, if only you had the wit to realize it, is closed only to half-baked claptrap such as your own bedraggled water-surface "theories".
practical importance, like the cold fusion
show me your cold-fusion reactor, and I'll show you a snake-oil salesman.
antialias_physorg
4.4 / 5 (7) Sep 11, 2014
@Jixo

WTF

Never mind Zephyr (or as his current sockpuppets are called Jixo. Aligo, etc. ). He knows as much about what science is, what scientists do or what the scientific process is as I do about telepathy.
Hat1208
5 / 5 (1) Sep 11, 2014
@antialias_physorg

Thank you for that coherent sentence.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.