Say Ello to the new privacy debate on social media

September 29, 2014 by Luke Heemsbergen, The Conversation

Say hello to the new Ello. Ello
Ello is new social networking space on the web that is receiving a lot of attention of late – so much that it's caused a few problems with the website out of action from time to time.

Ello's new popularity is in part because it offers a different view to representing and monitoring our digital selves than Facebook. But Ello's own privacy/public tradeoff is still evolving, and can teach us a lot about what privacy means online, and how contextual integrity, not just "" matters.

Ello is a social networking platform that does not require people to use their real name when they sign up for an account (by invitation only at the moment). It protects users' patterns of use (their metadata) from Google. It does not sell any member information to third-parties such as advertisers. In fact, the free service promises to remain ad-free forever.

Instead, Ello offers an artistic and vaguely grown-up vibe (nudity is OK) with lots of white space, monospaced font, and is the hottest place to be on the web at the moment (if you still haven't been invited, then ping me).

Hello Ello

Created in January 2014, Ello exploded onto the scene in late September after some of Facebook's LGTBQ community in San Francisco were forced into becoming vocal and eloquent opponents of Facebook's real name policies.

The reasons for not wanting real name identities in social media are varied, but taken together, they rally against Mark Zuckerberg's oft quoted claim that:

[…] having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity.

Zuckerberg's quote is taken from the David Kirkpatrick's book The Facebook Effect. In it, Zuckerberg is explaining on a practical level how the amount of transparency the world now has won't support a person having two identities.

But people who disagree with Zuckerberg's vision for personal "radical transparency" in social life (online or off) are starting to look for alternative places to be social.

The alternative to Facebook that Ello offers seems closer to the wild west of the internet's past: it's experimental, run by the community for the community, and openly fumbling as it goes along.

The serious privacy concerns voiced by creatrixtiara a member of ello's own community (who fled from Facebook) is one such fumble.

[…] there are specific elements of Ello's privacy settings, deliberately designed, that make Ello actually way more unsafe than Facebook, Twitter, or other social media outlets and CMSes. And in our rush to embrace a Facebook replacement we need to be aware of what we are at risk for when using Ello.

That original post – and creatrixtiara's final post on Ello – generated plenty of interest with updates available here.

In short, creatrixtiara calls out that there is currently no privacy in Ello! Everything posted is public. There are no controls to adjust who sees what and who contacts whom. As Ello's documentation states (for now):

Ello is a platform built for posting and sharing public content. You should assume that anything you post on Ello other than private messages will be accessed by others. Search engines will be able to see the content you post. Content you post may be copied, shared, or re-posted on Ello and on other parts of the internet in ways that you and we cannot control.

Complete publicity for all posts provides a different set of expectations than the 1.1 billion people of Facebook are accustomed to.

This creates a cognitive dissonance of Ello being worse and better than Facebook at the same time. It also allows us a better understanding of how privacy works: Privacy is contextual and Ello is still building its own context.

Privacy is contextual

Privacy expert Helen Nissenbaum remarks on the need to tie "adequate protection for privacy to norms of specific contexts, demanding that information gathering and dissemination be appropriate to that context".

She calls this contextual integrity. That is to say, contextually specific presumptions of privacy are tied to common practices of appropriateness and flows of information. Breaching (or changing) these practices is what violates privacy.

In short, context matters for what you share and how it's shared. This is as true offline as online. Conversations among close friends are different in context, content and expectations of sharing than remarks given in a public domain.

As of publication, Ello has sent an email to its users stating that "the ability to block specific users from looking at your Ello feed and profile, and from commenting on your posts" is coming soon. The context of communicating and privacy on Ello are not yet written.

What is of interest as we navigate our personal identities is that Nissenbaum's requirement for "contextual integrity' flies in the face of Zuckerberg's absolutist version of personal integrity.

Contextual integrity thinks about the integrity of the community and the platform rather than just the person. It understands that measures of decency, etiquette, sociability, convention, and morality are created not dictated. Ello's growing pains are showing us an example of how these are created.

For more information on Ello's (evolving) privacy policy you can read its aptly named "wtf", which is of course, fully public.

The irony of all this is that as the who's who of the internet's social media rush to adopt Ello, they are mostly doing so with their real names.

What makes Ello special, however, is that the people who do sign up under their real names, don't have to. And they might also be singing up under pseudonyms, which allow them to create new vibrant communities publicly, without worrying about an ideal from Silicon Valley about absolutist personal integrity.

Explore further: 'Anti-Facebook' social network gets viral surge

Related Stories

'Anti-Facebook' social network gets viral surge

September 28, 2014

In a matter of days, the new social network Ello, described as the "anti-Facebook" for its stand on privacy and advertising, has become perhaps the hottest ticket on the Internet.

Facebook rolls out 'privacy checkup'

September 5, 2014

Facebook on Thursday began rolling out its "privacy checkup" aimed at helping users of the huge social network better manage sharing their information and postings.

Facebook settles with FTC over deception charges

November 29, 2011

Facebook is settling with the Federal Trade Commission over charges it deceived consumers with its privacy settings to get people to share more personal information than they originally agreed to.

Recommended for you

Cellular microRNA detection with miRacles

March 26, 2019

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding regulatory RNAs that can repress gene expression post-transcriptionally and are therefore increasingly used as biomarkers of disease. Detecting miRNAs can be arduous and expensive as ...

What happened before the Big Bang?

March 26, 2019

A team of scientists has proposed a powerful new test for inflation, the theory that the universe dramatically expanded in size in a fleeting fraction of a second right after the Big Bang. Their goal is to give insight into ...

Probiotic bacteria evolve inside mice's GI tracts

March 26, 2019

Probiotics—which are living bacteria taken to promote digestive health—can evolve once inside the body and have the potential to become less effective and sometimes even harmful, according to a new study from Washington ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Creatrix Tiara
not rated yet Sep 29, 2014
Hi! Thanks for linking to my post. Just a few notes:

1. I haven't actually fled Facebook - I mostly wanted to check out what the big deal over Ello is and see if it will be the new place to catch up with the 90% of my communities that signed up. Because of the issues I outlined, I haven't made the switch.

2. I moved updates to: because the original post was getting too long.

3. The nudity thing came about because a lot of new signups were sex workers and erotic professionals (burlesque performers, sex educators, artists, etc) who were concerned that their *professions* would get them booted like on other sites. Ello still classifies porn as the same thing as abuse, which is problematic.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.