Better regulations needed for deep-sea biology

Better regulations needed for deep-sea biology
From 1930 onwards adventurers descended into the ocean in a steel globe so they could make direct observations. That triggered people’s imagination and resulted in magazine covers like this one of the deep-sea tractor in Modern Mechanix in 1935.

Although we know relatively little about the deep sea, we do extract raw materials for electronics and medicines from it. Biologist Erik Dücker describes the history of deep-sea biology in his thesis. He also gives some pointers on policy and on how to protect this remarkable but rather inaccessible area. He will receive his PhD at Radboud University on 23 September.

Deep-sea biology involves doing research below a depth of one thousand metres. 'The upper thousand metres and the seabed are familiar areas, since they are relatively easy to research', Dücker explains, 'but we are very much in the dark, literally and metaphorically, about the area in between. Deep-sea research is extremely expensive and complicated. Just one expedition day costs $30,000. However, the that do go down to that depth discover on every expedition. So the prospects for new knowledge are good.'

Harvesting manganese nodules from the deep sea

Such prospects make it essential to have a clear policy. Industries like mining will do anything to obtain licences to exploit the area, while the consequences of mining remain underexplored. For example, they want to harvest manganese nodules from the seabed. These 'lumps' have taken millions of years to grow and contain traces of the valuable rare-earth metals used to produce electronic appliances like iPhones. Inactive hydrothermal vents – cracks in the Earth's crust – contain such metals too.

Policy on rare-earth metals

Better regulations needed for deep-sea biology
Deep-sea biology infographic

At present, 95% of rare-earth metals come from China. Buyers (mainly Western countries) are therefore looking for alternative sources. Many have set their sights on the deep sea. However, 'harvesting manganese nodules is anything but sustainable. They are not replaceable because nodule formation is the slowest geological process we know. In addition, harvesting is technically difficult and expensive, so for a long time it was thought to be impossible. Nevertheless, experts expect this harvesting to happen on a larger scale within the next ten years, so we quickly need to agree on ways of doing this properly.'

Double role for deep-sea biologists

Better regulations needed for deep-sea biology
The first systematic investigation of the deep sea was carried out in 1839 by means of dredging; dragging nets over the sea bed. The materials recovered in this way were then investigated. Deep-water dredging was very labour-intensive and also required special techniques and extremely strong ropes that had to be kilometres long.

Dücker hopes his thesis will make policymakers realise that they not only have to protect the deep sea but also the deep-sea biologists. 'There are few deep-sea biologists, so they often have a double role. Governments as well as companies and environmental protectionists ask them to do research and to gather information. They have a heavy responsibility to deal fairly with conflicting interests and to remain autonomous.'


Explore further

From 'Finding Nemo' to minerals—what riches lie in the deep sea?

Citation: Better regulations needed for deep-sea biology (2014, September 4) retrieved 18 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-09-deep-sea-biology.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more