You can't teach speed: sprinters break 10-year rule

June 26, 2014
Credit: Erik van Leeuwen/Wikipedia

New research shows world-class sprinters are born, not created. Grand Valley State University researchers found that exceptional speed prior to formal training is a prerequisite for becoming a world-class sprinter. The findings are published in the online journal PeerJ.

The research, conducted by Michael Lombardo, professor of biology, and Robert Deaner, associate professor of psychology, shows that the developmental histories of elite sprinters contradict the popular model of expertise. According to this model, there is no such thing as innate talent. Instead, 10 years of deliberate practice (roughly 10,000 hours) are necessary and sufficient for anyone to become an expert in any field, including sports.

The researchers studied biographies of 26 world-class sprinters, including 15 Olympic gold medalists and the eight fastest men in U.S. history. The first major finding was that every expert sprinter, male or female, was recognized as exceptionally fast prior to beginning formal training. This contradicts the deliberate practice model, which assumes that initial performance and final performance in a domain will be unrelated. A second key finding was that, contrary to the 10-year rule, most sprinters achieved world class performances in less than five years, and more than half of the Olympic champions reached this level in three years or fewer.

In addition, Lombardo and Deaner surveyed 64 sprinters and throwers (i.e., shot put, javelin, discus) who qualified for the 2012 NCAA collegiate track and field outdoor championships. Sprinters recalled being faster as children, while throwers recalled greater strength and overhand throwing ability. Another key finding was that the collegiate sprinters' best performances in their first season of high school competition, generally the beginning of formal training or deliberate practice, were consistently faster than 95-99 percent of their peers.

"Rob and I both ran track in college, and we follow the sport pretty closely," said Lombardo. "So we expected that most sprint champions' biographies would indicate that they were always the fastest kid in their neighborhood, even before they did any formal training or received any coaching. But the consistency of the pattern was surprising – from Helen Stephens, a 1936 Olympian, to Usain Bolt, there were no exceptions. Gathering the data systematically allowed us to see how strong the patterns were. It also allowed us to test and rule out alternative explanations."

The authors noted that because speed is crucial for many sports, the new results imply that talent is important for many sports besides track and field. The authors also pointed out that their behavioral data complement many genetic and physiological studies indicating individual variation in athletic talent.

"Our results won't come as a surprise to most biologists, sports scientists, or coaches—all of the previous data pointed to this conclusion," said Deaner. "But our results are important because the deliberate practice model and its '10-year rule' remains enormously popular among many social scientists and intellectuals. Our results are clear-cut and should require no scientific training to understand. So we hope they will finally put an end to the debate."

The researchers stressed that their results support an interactive model of expertise development. "Our point is not that talent trumps everything," said Lombardo. "Training is crucial, especially the kinds of training highlighted by the deliberate practice model. But in sports, innate talent is required too."

Explore further: Women's empowerment and Olympic success

More information: You can't teach speed: sprinters falsify the deliberate practice model of expertise, PeerJ,

Related Stories

Women's empowerment and Olympic success

May 13, 2014

New research shows that nations with greater women's empowerment win more medals and send more athletes to the Summer Olympics. The effect of women's empowerment held for both men and women, although it was stronger for female ...

Sports teams may lose out from having 'too much talent'

June 11, 2014

As the FIFA World Cup kicks off and the NBA finals "heat" up, new research suggests that there is such a thing as having too much talent on a sports team. The research indicates that, after a certain point, the addition of ...

Practice makes perfect? Not so much

May 20, 2013

Turns out, that old "practice makes perfect" adage may be overblown. New research led by Michigan State University's Zach Hambrick finds that a copious amount of practice is not enough to explain why people differ in level ...

Rosin up that bow, maestro: And thank your genes

June 26, 2014

Mom or dad may have driven you to cello rehearsal all those years, but you can also thank your genes for pushing you to practice, according to new research led by a Michigan State University professor.

Short heels make elite sprinters super speedy

October 30, 2009

What is it about elite sprinters that gives them the edge over non-sprinters in the 100m dash? Stephen Piazza from the Pennsylvania State University publishes his discovery, in The Journal of Experimental Biology, that the ...

Recommended for you

Stressed-out meerkats less likely to help group

September 22, 2017

Dominant female meerkats use aggression to keep subordinates from breeding, but a new study finds this negative behavior also can result in the latter becoming less willing to help within the group.

Why poison frogs don't poison themselves

September 21, 2017

Don't let their appearance fool you: Thimble-sized, dappled in cheerful colors and squishy, poison frogs in fact harbor some of the most potent neurotoxins we know. With a new paper published in the journal Science, scientists ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 26, 2014
The 10000-hour rule is still good as far as becoming an expert. The people they have studied are world champions, which is very different from "simply" an expert.
not rated yet Jun 26, 2014
So, a lot of sports isn't really about skill...but boils down to DNA...and possibly steroids...
not rated yet Jun 26, 2014
So, a lot of sports isn't really about skill...but boils down to DNA...and possibly steroids...
not rated yet Jun 26, 2014
They repeated the same study for superstar mathematicians and physicists and found that before they had any formal training they were 95% to 99% smarter than everyone else.
1 / 5 (4) Jun 26, 2014
The first major finding was that every expert sprinter, male or female, was recognized as exceptionally fast prior to beginning formal training.

This is actually fairly obvious. You don't make the starting team unless you are already exceptional, therefore only exceptional people actually receive training, well mostly anyway.

Baseball coaches don't say, "Well, we're going to pick the worst batters, the worst fielders, the worst base runners,a nd the worst pitchers, and we're going to make them into a team and coach them."


They pick the best who show up to tryouts, and then they coach those people.

Where is the epiphany in this?

I don't understand why this is even a research topic, it's incredibly obvious.

Okay, okay, let's humor ourselves and repeatedly test the obvious observation, apparently nobody in "science" had been doing that. Start with a bad theory and you'll get a bad result, if you design a bad enough "experiment".
not rated yet Jun 27, 2014

Obviously they don't pick pro-athletes as babies, so there is still the question of how much the people have trained on their own before being tried.

What is actually obvious is that there is a limit to human skill, and you can't train people beyond their physical limits.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.