Payday lenders target the financially vulnerable

Payday lenders target the financially vulnerable
Payday lenders in Australia loan up to $1 billion a year.

Payday lenders are targeting cash-strapped residents of poorer suburbs, a University of Melbourne study has determined.

Researchers analysed the locations of 123 payday lending stores across Victoria and found they were over-represented in areas of relatively greater socio-economic disadvantage.

The working class suburbs including Glenroy, Preston, Dandenong and Frankston all had five or more payday lending stores. In all, about 60% to 80% of payday lending stores are located in areas of relative disadvantage (based on Australian Bureau of Statistics measures for socio-economic disadvantage).

The research was led by Professor Ian Ramsay from the University's Melbourne Law School.

"Our study confirms that payday lenders are more likely to base stores in socio-economically disadvantaged areas, providing easy access to low-paid and struggling consumers."

Professor Ramsay warns that payday loans can entrench existing poverty, through the use of high interest rates and by people taking out loans to meet basic living expenses.

The use of direct debit from bank accounts—which can prioritise the repayment of the payday loan over other expenses—is also an issue.

"The adverse effects of payday loans are also compounded when, as other research has shown, borrowers often have multiple payday loans or make continuous use of payday loans," he said.

Payday lending is big business in Australia with lending estimated to be up to $1 billion a year and hundreds of thousands of consumers using payday loans.

Other research indicates typical payday borrowers already suffer from 'financial exclusion' – that is, they lack access to appropriate and affordable financial services and products. They are often on low incomes or dependent on welfare payments.

"This research rebuts the repeated claims of payday lenders that their borrowers are not financially vulnerable," Professor Ramsay said.

"Clearly more needs to be done to promote financial inclusion, including alternatives to payday loans that entrench disadvantage."

The research—co-authored by Melbourne Law School's Paul Ali and Cosima McRae—will be published in the Journal of Business Law.

Explore further

Payday can be a killer, new study shows

Citation: Payday lenders target the financially vulnerable (2014, June 5) retrieved 20 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 06, 2014
I'm not certain that the core "product" is the problem, rather the lack of diligence in checking the ability of those who take out the loans to pay them back in the timeframe set out. The typical customer of the likes of Wonga is likely someone who cannot get credit elsewhere. If even one of the high interest credit cards is out of reach then they will likely have either a very poor credit history or a low or unstable disposable income, possibly both. This adds up to being the sort of application which should be subject to the decision of an underwriter with the applicant having to prove their ability to repay. I very much doubt that this happens with any of the payday loan companies, who likely as not make more profit from defaulters. That said, this is a two way street, and there has to be an element of responsibility on the borrower's part too. Stopping the ads might help, as might a statutory "cooling off period" in any loan contract. http://speedyloan...y-loans/

Jun 07, 2014
Of course they do. All's fair in a Kapitalist country... after all....

Or.. the GREEDY are just like bedbugs..... and just as ugly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more