Brazil's World Cup also a test bed for climate change

June 12, 2014
The World Cup also a test bed for climate change experts say, pictured is an aerial view of the Amazon river, Brazil on December 12, 2013

Beyond the spectacle of 32 nations battling for the greatest prize in football, the World Cup is also a test bed for tackling climate-damaging carbon emissions from major events.

The world's biggest sports fest is a major source of carbon, but FIFA says this year's event should break new ground in addressing the problem.

It describes the 2014 show as a "stepping stone" towards "sustainable" World Cups by evaluating and reducing the carbon footprint.

From 2018, World Cups go into a new, greener phase, because environmental protection will be a mandatory requirement in hosting the contest.

FIFA estimates the Brazil event will produce about 2.7 million tonnes of emissions as measured in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)—roughly the total emissions of Iceland over a six-month period.

"It's not just about the number of flights from A to B, it's also the tonnes of cables that are being used in TV production and the number of hours the refrigerators will be running during the World Cup," said Federico Addiechi, FIFA's head of .

But outside observers such as Frederic Chome, director of Belgium-based carbon consultancy Factor X, say the real tally is even higher.

"The problem with these sporting events is that they fail to factor in many emissions sources," he told AFP.

Missing from the FIFA inventory are preparations like stadium construction, which uses vast amounts of carbon-spewing cement, and manufacturing, transporting and use of World Cup-related products.

"Big international events like this cause TV sales to rise by one percentage point, which is about 20 million individual sets," Chome pointed out.

A boy plays football at da Pinheira beach in Santa Catarina, Brazil on April 2006

"If you consider that one TV costs 5-6 tonnes of CO2 to make, that makes at least 100 million additional tonnes of CO2. And then you add a billion televisions drawing power for three hours a day over three weeks, that makes another two million tonnes of CO2."

Many smaller, apparently invisible items add to the footprint.

FIFA is issuing sets of World Cup uniforms—two pairs of trousers, three T-shirts, a jacket, a jersey, a cap and a rain poncho—to the 2,880 people hired for the event.

The outfits were made in China and shipped nearly 20,000 kilometres (12,400 miles) to Rio. They were then transported another 1,660 km to the host cities. The result: about 436 tonnes of CO2e.

It all adds up, say the experts, but the single biggest polluter is always transport.

It accounts for more than 80 percent of World Cup emissions, mainly through international carriers ferrying the estimated 40 percent of international fans to Brazil. Some of the host venues are more than 3,000 km apart.

Going greener

Brazil estimates that 60,000 tonnes of direct emissions will result from accommodation, domestic flights and ground transport, construction and tournament "operations."

These will be more than offset by 115,000 tonnes of carbon credits donated by local companies and projects, it says.

A plane land in Rio de Janeiro, FIFA estimates the World Cup will produce 2.7 million tonnes of C02 emissions Santos Dumont airport during December 27, 2012 dawn, when temperature reaches 27°C (80.6° F). On the eve, Rio de Janeiro reported a heat record of 43.2°C (109.7°F), the highest temperature since 1915 according to the National Institute of Meteorology. AFP PHOTO/VANDERLEI ALMEIDA

The credits, essentially permits to emit greenhouse gases, can be sold if unused, and form part of international efforts to curb Earth-warming carbon pollution through fossil fuel consumption.

Once indirect emissions from international flights and tourism are added, Brazil has calculated the total emissions at 1.4 million tonnes, compared to FIFA estimated output of 2.7 million.

FIFA has said it will offset 251,000 tonnes through projects worth about $2.5 million (1.9 million euros) that could include reforestation, or building wind farms and hydroelectric plants.

The previous host, South Africa, emitted 1.65 million tonnes of World Cup greenhouse gases—a million tonnes less than predicted, partly because fewer tourists came.

Night view of the bright lights of Botafogo area on October 30, 2012

Brazil's could therefore be much higher, although it uses less-polluting energy obtained in large part from hydro-generation.

"Big are increasingly winning green medals for their environmental performance," says UN climate chief Christiana Figueres, although Chome cautions that a truly green sports event is "a flight of fancy".

"The best we can do is to have much stricter environmental criteria from the point of determining candidate hosts," he said.

Explore further: Brazil promises 'greenest World Cup'

Related Stories

Brazil promises 'greenest World Cup'

May 28, 2014

Brazil announced a package of pollution-cutting measures aimed at making this year's World Cup more environmentally friendly, ranging from an emissions-trading scheme to a "green passport" smart-phone application.

Is the FIFA World cup qualification a fair game?

June 11, 2014

In their new article, "Unfair play in World Cup qualification? An analysis of the 1998–2010 FIFA World Cup performances and the bias in the allocation of tournament berths", Christian Stone and Michel Rod studied the match ...

Climate: Carbon 'offsets' rise 4% in 2012

May 30, 2013

Trade in carbon offsets, a voluntary means of reducing one's footprint in global-warming gases, rose by four percent in volume terms last year as the market price of carbon collapsed, a report said on Thursday.

Recommended for you

Arctic wintertime sea ice extent is among lowest on record

March 23, 2018

Sea ice in the Arctic grew to its annual maximum extent last week, and joined 2015, 2016 and 2017 as the four lowest maximum extents on record, according to scientists at the NASA-supported National Snow and Ice Data Center ...

Germany was covered by glaciers 450,000 years ago

March 23, 2018

The timing of the Middle Pleistocene glacial-interglacial cycles and the feedback mechanisms between climatic shifts and earth-surface processes are still poorly understood. This is largely due to the fact that chronological ...

Wood pellets: Renewable, but not carbon neutral

March 22, 2018

A return to firewood is bad for forests and the climate. So reports William Schlesinger, President Emeritus of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, in an Insights article published today in the journal Science.

The tradeoffs inherent in earthquake early warning systems

March 22, 2018

A team of researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey and the California Institute of Technology has found that modern earthquake early warning (EEW) systems require those interpreting their messages to take into consideration ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.