How Earth was watered

February 28, 2014 by Alvin Powell, Harvard University
“It is very possible that many planets are born with liquid water oceans,” said Linda Elkins-Tanton, director of the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Department of Terrestrial Magnetism. Credit: Kris Snibbe/Harvard Staff Photographer

Early Earth's accidental deluge via water-carrying comets has long been a stumbling block for those interested in life on other planets.

Scientists agree that life needs water to evolve. But if water only arrives through chance impacts with comets, then life elsewhere might indeed be rare.

Water is common among the meteorites and other small bodies whose collisions formed the Earth, but scientists have long believed that the intense heat of the events dried out the young planet. Water must have arrived later, splashing down from comets after the planet was formed.

New research, however, is changing that view. Evidence is mounting that the planet's water arrived early, during formation, aboard meteorites and small bodies called "planetesimals." The work also suggests that though the planet-forming collisions were so energetic that they led to oceans of magma and widespread melting, even the intense heat would not have dried out the planet completely.

The emerging view of a watery birth for the Earth has raised the hopes of scientists seeking extrasolar life. If the presence of water isn't left to chance collisions but instead is a product of the planet-forming process, then oceans where life can evolve may be common after all.

"It is very possible that many planets are born with liquid water oceans," said Linda Elkins-Tanton, director of the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Terrestrial Magnetism.

Elkins-Tanton spoke Wednesday at the Geological Lecture Hall. Her talk, "Building Earth-like Planets," was part of the Evolution Matters lecture series of the Harvard Museum of Natural History. Elkins-Tanton studies the evolution of terrestrial planets and the relationship between Earth and its life forms.

One problem with the water-from-comets theory, Elkins-Tanton said, is that evidence has emerged that water was present on Earth far earlier than previously thought. The planet's oldest rocks date back 4.03 billion years, but there's a material older than rocks, called "detrital zircons," that formed some 4.40 billion years ago, just 164 million years after the first solids began to form out of the protoplanetary disk. And some of those zircons show evidence of having been created in contact with water.

Another issue with the comet theory, Elkins-Tanton said, is that the water on most comets doesn't match that on Earth. Water is made up of oxygen and hydrogen. Hydrogen's nucleus is normally made up of one proton, but the nucleus of a different form, called deuterium, has a proton and a neutron. Scientists can fingerprint water using the ratio of regular hydrogen to deuterium. For most comets, that ratio doesn't match water on Earth, she said.

Meanwhile, the water in meteorites and planetesimals does match that of Earth. But before scientists could settle on those bodies as the source of the planet's water, they had to solve another problem. Those bodies had up to 18 percent water, much more than Earth, and scientists couldn't think of a reasonable process to explain where it all went.

The answer that has emerged, Elkins-Tanton said, is that much is lost in the development of a planet.

Planetesimals that are large enough have an internal heating process, powered by the decay of an isotope of aluminum, which is unknown on Earth. This can cause water to rise to the surface, where much is lost to space. The remaining water is close to that of Earth, Elkins-Tanton said.

With the right isotopes in water and roughly the right amount, scientists could point to planetesimals, not comets, as Earth's water source.

Next, they had to understand whether and how water might survive the collisions that created the planet. Evidence came from looking at other bodies, such as Mercury and the moon. Scientists examined a volatile material, potassium, on Mercury, thought to be as likely to be lost in an impact as water would be on Earth, and found a ratio similar to that on Earth, indicating that not all volatiles were lost in Mercury's planet-forming process. They also looked at the interior of the moon, which experienced a massive formative collision but no subsequent watery comet impact, and found that parts of it have as much water as Earth does. Together, these examples indicate that water could survive the planet-forming process, Elkins-Tanton said.

Computer modeling demonstrated how. The extreme heat would have boiled the water off as steam. But instead of being lost to space, it eventually would have condensed and fallen back, re-creating oceans in a cycle that repeated from collision to collision, Elkins-Tanton said.

"The evidence that we have from our solar system indicates that the chances that planets everywhere in the universe are habitable through liquid obtained by natural accretion … are very high."

Explore further: Study suggests that trace amounts of water created oceans on Earth, other terrestrial planets

Related Stories

Looking for life in all the wrong places

February 3, 2014

( —Scientists have long focused their search for extraterrestrial life on Earth-like planets – but that may be a mistake, according to a McMaster researcher.

Oldest bit of crust firms up idea of a cool early Earth

February 23, 2014

With the help of a tiny fragment of zircon extracted from a remote rock outcrop in Australia, the picture of how our planet became habitable to life about 4.4 billion years ago is coming into sharper focus.

Solar system ice: Source of Earth's water

July 12, 2012

Scientists have long believed that comets and, or a type of very primitive meteorite called carbonaceous chondrites were the sources of early Earth's volatile elements—which include hydrogen, nitrogen, and carbon—and ...

Recommended for you

How hot are atoms in the shock wave of an exploding star?

January 21, 2019

A new method to measure the temperature of atoms during the explosive death of a star will help scientists understand the shock wave that occurs as a result of this supernova explosion. An international team of researchers, ...

New eclipsing cataclysmic variable discovered

January 21, 2019

Using the Mobile Astronomical System of Telescope-Robots (MASTER), an international team of astronomers has detected a new eclipsing cataclysmic variable. The newfound object, designated MASTER OT J061451.70–272535.5, is ...

The disintegrating exoplanet K2-22b

January 21, 2019

Exoplanet surveys have yielded many surprises over the years, and the discovery of "disintegrating" exoplanets was one of them. These are planets that produce asymmetric shapes in the dips of the light curves seen as they ...

Total lunar eclipse woos sky watchers

January 21, 2019

An unusual set of celestial circumstances came together over Sunday night and the wee hours of Monday for sky watchers in Europe, Africa and the Americas, where the moon was fully obscured before lighting up again with a ...

Making stars when the universe was half its age

January 18, 2019

The universe is about 13.8 billion years old, and its stars are arguably its most momentous handiwork. Astronomers studying the intricacies of star formation across cosmic time are trying to understand whether stars and the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (5) Feb 28, 2014
Tremendous amounts of water - far in excess of what is found on the earth's surface - are bound chemically in the rocks of the mantle. This water can be released by reducing pressure on the rocks while maintaining temperature high enough to keep the hydrated rock molten, much as can be seen in ANY volcano. Plinian eruptions are driven by gas pressure, mostly from supercritical water.
3.3 / 5 (4) Feb 28, 2014
It's not easy to get water to a planet, unless ... the planet forms in overflow of water. Imagine the existence of many hydrogen balls of Earth weight. Acting as a vacuum cleaner in space, they will pick up various "metals" form supernova explosions. Oxygen combines with H to make water; iron-oxides get converted into water and pure iron, which sinks to the center. Now coagulating many of these, you can get a rocky Earth, while most of the hydrogen will escape. This explains the pure iron in the Earth's core, the abundance of water in all rocks. No planetesimals needed.
5 / 5 (2) Feb 28, 2014
There seems to be almost a panic to find life elsewhere?
3 / 5 (3) Feb 28, 2014
This is a welcome development in earth science, at least by me. The 'bombardment' explanation for Earth's liquid oceans never made much sense to me. Oh, sure, we gained water through bombardment, but water was prominent in the cloud of matter from which the solar system formed, so it *had* to be included in Earth's original formation.

Where'd that water go? Some of it went into the mantle, where most of it probably still exists under great pressure. And some went into a hot thick atmosphere. Earth's early atmosphere may even have been dominated by gaseous water.

Some was lost to space, but look at Venus - a hot, thick atmosphere lasting billions of years with *less* gravity than Earth, and facing a heavier solar wind, too.

So Earth had a thick atmosphere. It cooled, and it rained.

Oddly, that explanation was present in textbooks when I was a child. It fell out of fashion to the 'bombardment' explanation. Now the worm turns again!
5 / 5 (2) Feb 28, 2014
Tremendous amounts of water - far in excess of what is found on the earth's surface - are bound chemically in the rocks of the mantle. This water can be released by reducing pressure on the rocks while maintaining temperature high enough to keep the hydrated rock molten, much as can be seen in ANY volcano. Plinian eruptions are driven by gas pressure, mostly from supercritical water.

Your comment highlights a hue problem in science today and that is the almost total lack of cross fertilization of ideas/theories between the sciences.

The specialties are so insular and sometimes so specialized that what you and I think should be common sense isn't, because astronomers who study planetary formation only talk amongst themselves.

A vulcanologist would say much of what your wrote if they bothered to ask one. ;)

That astronomers still struggle with this possibility as novel shows they still have yet to seek answers from those who would know better. LOL
space music
5 / 5 (1) Mar 03, 2014
nobody here cares..........but the bible says it was present from the beginning.......

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.