300,000-year-old hearth found

January 27, 2014
300,000-year-old hearth found
This is a scan of a sediment "slice" from the hearth area of the cave showing burnt bone and rock fragments within the gray ash residue Credit: Weizmann Institute of Science

Humans, by most estimates, discovered fire over a million years ago. But when did they really begin to control fire and use it for their daily needs? That question – one which is central to the subject of the rise of human culture – is still hotly debated. A team of Israeli scientists recently discovered in the Qesem Cave, an archaeological site near present-day Rosh Ha'ayin, the earliest evidence – dating to around 300,000 years ago – of unequivocal repeated fire building over a continuous period. These findings not only help answer the question, they hint that those prehistoric humans already had a highly advanced social structure and intellectual capacity.

Excavations in Qesem Cave have been ongoing since 2000. The team is headed by Profs. Avi Gopher and Ran Barkai of Tel Aviv University. Dr. Ruth Shahack-Gross of the Kimmel Center for Archeological Science at the Weizmann Institute has been involved in this archaeological research since excavations began, and she collects samples on-site for later detailed analysis in the lab. Shahack-Gross, whose expertise is in the identification of archaeological materials, identified a thick deposit of wood ash in the center of the cave. Using infrared spectroscopy, she and her colleagues were able to determine that mixed in with the ash were bits of bone and soil that had been heated to very high temperatures. This was conclusive proof that the area had been the site of a large hearth.

Next, Shahack-Gross tested the micro-morphology of the ash. To do this, she extracted a cubic chunk of sediment from the hearth and hardened it in the lab. Then she sliced it into extremely thin slices – so thin they could be placed under a microscope to observe the exact composition of the materials in the deposit and reveal how they were formed. With this method, she was able to distinguish a great many micro-strata in the ash – evidence for a hearth that was used repeatedly over time. These findings were published in the Journal of Archaeological Science.

Around the hearth area, as well as inside it, the archaeologists found large numbers of flint tools that were clearly used for cutting meat. In contrast, the found just a few meters away had a different shape, designed for other activities. Also in and around the area were of burnt animal bones – further evidence for repeated fire use for cooking meat. Shahack-Gross and her colleagues have shown that this organization of various "household" activities into different parts of the cave points to an organization of space – and a thus kind of social order – that is typical of modern humans. This suggests that the cave was a sort of base camp that returned to again and again.

Upper left: This is an infrared spectrum of the grey sediments, right, showing that the dominant material is calcite, the mineral of which the wood ash is composed. Lower left: This is a photograph of the cave during excavation; arrow pointing to the hearth. Upper right: This is a micro-morphological image of the grey sediment showing dark grey particles and patches corresponding to the remains of wood ash. Lower right: This is a scan of a micro-morphological, thin section showing the layered burnt bones (yellow, brown and black fragments), intermixed with grey sediments. Credit: Weizmann Institute of Science

"These findings help us to fix an important turning point in the development of – that in which humans first began to regularly use fire both for cooking meat and as a focal point – a sort of campfire – for social gatherings," she says. "They also tell us something about the impressive levels of social and cognitive development of humans living some 300,000 years ago." The researchers think that these findings, along with others, are signs of substantial changes in human behavior and biology that commenced with the appearance in the region of new forms of culture – and indeed a new human species – about 400,000 years ago.

Explore further: New evidence suggests Neanderthals organized their living spaces

More information: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440313004068

Related Stories

Early human hunters had fewer meat-sharing rituals

August 13, 2009

A University of Arizona anthropologist has discovered that humans living at a Paleolithic cave site in central Israel between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago were as successful at big-game hunting as were later stone-age hunters ...

Recommended for you

Predicting the future with the wisdom of crowds

June 23, 2017

Forecasters often overestimate how good they are at predicting geopolitical events—everything from who will become the next pope to who will win the next national election in Taiwan.

UN says world population will reach 9.8 billion in 2050

June 22, 2017

India's population is expected to surpass China's in about seven years and Nigeria is projected to overtake the United States and become the third most populous country in the world shortly before 2050, a U.N. report said ...

Authenticity key to landing a new job

June 22, 2017

At job interviews, relax and be yourself - if you're good, being yourself may be the best way to secure a job offer, according to a new study involving UCL researchers.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Jan 27, 2014
"A team of Israeli scientists recently discovered in the Qesem Cave"
1 / 5 (3) Jan 27, 2014
Who knew someone could expose their anti semitism by simply quoting something from an article.
5 / 5 (3) Jan 27, 2014
"A team of Israeli scientists recently discovered in the Qesem Cave"

The way they fractured that sentence it did read as thought they just discovered the team.

I wonder if they have attempted to date any of the individual team members yet to determine how long they've been there. Will this push back the date of earliest known discovery of an intact science team? We may also have to reassess how long scientists have been forming themselves into team-like configurations. Does this finding represent an early attempt to align individual scientists onto a functioning group? Was it successful, and if so, was this collaborative arrangement passed down at that time as a beneficial adaptation?

Inevitably we'll also have to ask what they ate at meetings?
5 / 5 (3) Jan 27, 2014
As long as we're being flippant:
In contrast, the flint tools found just a few meters away had a different shape, designed for other activities.

Probably for killing the guys who had the hearth - but that's just my cynicism talking.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.