Consumer understanding needed more than ever in food production

January 17, 2014 by Kerry Faulkner
Consumer understanding needed more than ever in food production
“If consumers are demanding a HGP-free product, then that is what producers have to produce”—Mr Hiscock. Credit: US Department of Agriculture

The increasing rejection of farming technology like hormonal growth promotants (HGP) should be regarded as unethical according to a scientist whose paper was recently published in the journal of Animal Production Science.

The article by Ian Lean investigates the effects of societal, government and retailer pressure on antibiotics in chicken and hormonal growth promotants for cattle.

It details how 'marketing ploys' like Coles' hormone-free beef campaign are unethical because they prioritise marketing; over animal care, over reducing the of production and over helping producers make a profit—all of which can be enhanced by the use of HGPs in and antibiotics in chicken.

Professor Lean says consumer activism supporting such measures as HGP-free beef is driven by a naturalistic fallacy—where supporters equate natural conditions with better outcomes. He predicts such activism will increase as consumers become less connected to the land and .

"If we relied on such 'natural systems', humans would live to an average of about 35 years, have a high risk of death in childbirth, and suffer high rates of infant mortality," the report says.

"Natural or organic systems cannot provide sufficient food to feed the current human population."

West Australian Beef Council chairman Tony Hiscock agrees consumers need to develop a better understanding of agriculture methods like those used to produce quality beef.

But he says the impact of the Coles' HGP-free campaign has not been that great on WA growers compared to other states, despite high levels of concern among growers initially.

"What has happened is that producers are producing animals to the required specifications," he says.

"All of a sudden Coles has increased its kill by 20,000 animals a year in WA since it [the ban] has been happening.

"That's because they have decided that rather than bringing in beef from other states they have decided to source their for WA consumption in WA.

"If Coles is sourcing more of its meat from WA on an ongoing basis then that's a plus.

"Ultimately what we need to understand is that it is the consumer who is going to drive what is required.

"If consumers are demanding a HGP-free product, then that is what producers have to produce."

Prof Lean says that one of the biggest challenges facing the planet is the need to feed between 9 and 9.6 billion people by 2050. Estimates are 100 per cent more food will be needed than is currently produced.

Explore further: After years of drought, beef prices may rise in the coming months

More information: Lean Ian J. (2013) Effects of retailer pressure on the efficiency of agricultural industries. Animal Production Science 53, 1143–1148.

Related Stories

Can naturally raised beef find its place in the industry?

October 18, 2010

As consumer demand for naturally raised beef continues to increase, researchers at the University of Illinois have discovered that naturally raised beef can be produced effectively for this niche market as long as a substantial ...

Different forage affects beef cattle weight, taste

September 18, 2013

Cattle are what they eat. The forage—grasses and other plants—beef cattle eat affects the nutrition and tastiness of the meat. Clemson University animal science researchers report that steers grazing on one of five forages ...

Remote livestock management system of the future

November 26, 2013

In a development that could revolutionise the way livestock are managed in rangelands around the world, three Australian cattle stations have been chosen to pioneer the remote livestock management system of the future.

Recommended for you

These shrews have heads that shrink with the season

October 23, 2017

If any part of the body would seem ill equipped to shrink, it would probably be the head and skull. And, yet, researchers reporting in Current Biology on October 23 have found that the skulls of red-toothed shrews do shrink ...

Single-molecule dissection of developmental gene control

October 23, 2017

Scientists at EPFL and Max Plank have made significant discoveries on how developmental genes are controlled by the methyltransferase enzyme PRC2. The study is published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.