New algorithm makes quadrocopters safer

New algorithm makes quadrocopters safer
Even after loss of a propeller, a quadrocopter remains airborne thanks to a new control algorithm. Credit: Mark Mueller / ETH Zurich

Drones like quadrocopters have become very popular with hobbyists due to their simplicity and agility. But they are also increasingly being used for commercial applications such as aerial photography and cinematography, inspection and transportation of cargo. Only a few days ago, Amazon announced plans for a new Prime Air service using drones to deliver small packages. Since then the US package delivery company UPS has announced similar plans.

One of the primary concerns currently limiting the widespread use of quadrocopters is safety. At the moment regulations severely restrict the commercial use of in most countries, including the EU and the US. However, regulators including the Federal Aviation Administration in the US are presently drafting suitable rules for civil unmanned aircraft systems potentially allowing drone delivery services like Amazon's Prime Air to become commercially viable as soon as 2015. When Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com, recently presented their research in using flying machines for package delivery, he pointed out one of the major concerns: "Look, this thing can't land on somebody's head while they're walking around their neighborhood".

If a quadrocopter loses a propeller, it can no longer control its flight with the normal control software, and may crash in a public area. ETH researchers have now developed a failsafe technology that makes quadrocopters safer and may thus pave the way for these vehicles to be used in safety-critical applications.

Safety is the key to future operations

"When our new software detects a propeller failure, it uses the remaining propellers to cause a continuous rotation of the vehicle," explains Mark Mueller, doctorate student at the Institute of Dynamic Systems and Control of ETH Zurich. The failsafe algorithm then controls the vehicle's movement by tilting this rotation, and varying the total produced thrust of the remaining propellers.

Until now, designers have had to use more than four propellers (for instance six propellers for a hexacopter, and eight for an octocopter) to allow the vehicles to survive the loss of a propeller. But hexa- and octocopters tend to be less efficient than quadrocopters, because each additional propeller adds structural weight, complexity, and increases the probability of a single motor failing.

Easy retrofit for multicopters

"Our failsafe technology requires no additional hardware, it's a software-only upgrade.

New algorithm makes quadrocopters safer
(A) shows the quadrocopter in normal operation. In (B) the propeller detaches due to vibrations, and the quadrocopter starts pitching over in (C) - (E). In (F) the vehicle has regained control, and is flying stably. Credit: Mark Mueller / ETH Zurich

This means that it could be easily implemented on existing multicopters." says Mueller. "The software allows multicopters to remain airborne and perform a controlled emergency landing with as little as three, two, or even just one motor intact."

The technology builds on, and extends, previous results from the Flying Machine Arena - a research testbed at ETH Zurich. Here, the researchers continuously work on developing new capabilities for flying machines, with a specific focus on quadrocopters.


Explore further

Amazon.com sees delivery drones as future (Update)

More information: www.flyingmachinearena.org/
Provided by ETH Zurich
Citation: New algorithm makes quadrocopters safer (2013, December 4) retrieved 18 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-12-algorithm-quadrocopters-safer.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more