Role of natural aerosols in climate uncertainties underestimated

earth
Credit: NASA

Natural aerosols, such as emissions from volcanoes or plants, may contribute more uncertainty than previously thought to estimates of how the climate might respond to greenhouse gas emissions.

An international team of researchers, led by the University of Leeds, has shown that the effect of aerosols on the since industrialisation depends strongly on what the atmosphere was like before pollution – when aerosols were produced only from . The research will be published in the journal Nature on 7 November.

Professor Ken Carslaw, from the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds and lead author of the study, said: "We have shown that our poor knowledge of aerosols prior to the industrial revolution dominates the uncertainty in how aerosols have affected clouds and climate.

"In order to better understand , we need to turn our attention towards understanding very clean regions of the atmosphere – as might have existed in the mid-1700s. Such regions are incredibly rare now, but we are looking for them."

Aerosols tend to increase the brightness of clouds, which would increase the reflection of solar radiation to space, thereby partially masking the climate-warming effects of greenhouse . Firmly establishing the effect of aerosol-induced changes on cloud brightness is an important challenge for climate scientists.

In an assessment of 28 factors that could affect the uncertainties in cloud brightness, the researchers found that 45% of the variance comes from natural aerosols, compared with 34% for human-generated . (Aerosol processes, such as how quickly they are removed from the atmosphere, account for the remaining uncertainty.)

"Our results provide a clear path for scientists to reduce the uncertainty in aerosol effects on climate because we have been able to rank the causes for the uncertainty," concludes Professor Carslaw.


Explore further

Increased greenhouse gases and aerosols have similar effects on rainfall

More information: The study, 'Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing', will be published in the journal Nature on 7 November 2013. dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12674
Journal information: Nature

Citation: Role of natural aerosols in climate uncertainties underestimated (2013, November 6) retrieved 19 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-11-role-natural-aerosols-climate-uncertainties.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 06, 2013
Any reduction in uncertainty is certainly good news.

The Climate models, which are now very good, just continue to get more and more precise.

Excellent.

Nov 07, 2013
What? Didn't False "Profit" Gore bray that the "Science is settled"

Nov 07, 2013
The science is settled, tardieboy. What is left is dotting the i's and crossing the t's.

The scientific discussion is over minutia of ever decreasing magnitude.

All First order effects have been quantified for a long time. Second order effects are now almost entirely quantified, and third order effects are partially quantified.

Poor Anti-Gore-Tard. He is too stupid to even begin to comprehend the depth of his own ignorance.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more