Four Hiroshima bombs a second: How we imagine climate change

August 14, 2013 by Dr David Holmes, The Conversation
What do you think of when you think about climate change? Credit: Wikimedia/NOAA

The planet is building up heat at the equivalent of four Hiroshima bombs worth of energy every second. And 90 percent of that heat is going into the oceans.

Right, now I've got your attention.

It's widely acknowledged that we need to keep climate change below 2C to avoid catastrophic impacts on society. To do so we need to cut . But this makes for tough choices for our leaders and for ourselves. Convincing people of the urgency of climate change is no mean feat.

Representing climate change and ocean warming as Hiroshima bombs attracted the attention of news media around the world.

So, when it comes to sharpening people's focus, which images have the most impact?

In a recently-released paper looking at how people visualise climate change, Saffron O'Neill at University of Exeter joined other researchers in the UK, US and Australia, to see how people engaged with climate change images drawn from mass media sources in those countries.

They investigated responses to images ranging from icons of nature, such as , snowstorms, bushfires, cracked ground and ice sheets to human made phenomena, such as wind farms, , low reservoirs, smoke-stacks, and fuel pumps and then images of political leaders.

For each image they wanted to measure:

1) "salience" – whether it raised the importance of climate change
2) empowerment or "self-efficacy" – the sense of being able to take any action on climate change.

Images of were the most salient: in order of impact – flood aerial view, ice sheet, deforestation, polar bear, cracked ground, coral reef. Of the human generated images, smokestacks, traffic jams and temperature graphs led the way in terms of distress.

The least influential images of climate salience were those of politicians and celebrities, including ones who had been linked to climate action such as Bob Geldof, Prince Charles and Richard Branson.

Credit: Flickr/NASA

An image of a church congregation was consistently ranked the lowest.

On the question of empowerment, solar panels, wind farms, electric cars, and home insulation led the bunch. These images related to how people could take actions to reduce emissions through personal energy choices.

In each kind of response, what stood out was the ability to relate personally to the image. Renewable technologies are an option that people can make happen in or near their own home.

Similarly, the salient flood aerial view, consistently the highest across all three countries, shows people's homes destroyed. So, unsurprisingly, what is common is that these images bring the message back to the home.

This is particularly evident with city-dwellers (the study was conducted in Melbourne, Norwich and Boulder), who have more of an urge to domesticate experiences to the dimensions of urban insularity.

For the most part, climate change as change cannot be visualised. People living in cities are the last to notice changes in climate, because it is happening a long way from our direct experience in the natural world.

But even populations that live on the land away from cities are not able to experience where most of the energy transfer is actually happening, in the oceans.

John Cook, a climate scientist based at University of Queensland teamed up with oceanographer John Church and several overseas scientists to make an astonishing calculation, which unfolds like this:

Ninety percent of the excess heat trapped in our atmosphere by greenhouse gases is actually absorbed by our oceans and ice. Without the oceans, that heat would be in our atmosphere. But because of the oceans, we can underestimate climate change.

The Cook team measured the amount of heat the oceans have absorbed in Joules. In terms of visualising warming, Joules are not very meaningful. So the team chose to convert ocean warming into a release of energy etched into the collective memory of the 20thcentury – the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

And the maths of this is quite disturbing. The equivalent of the heat released by 345,600 Hiroshima bombs is absorbed by the earth every day, or four bombs every second. Ninety per cent of the heat released by those bombs is going into the ocean.

What Cook and his group have hit upon is that abstract climate change processes are best explained by memes, icons and social memories that make the physics involved meaningful to people. What is going on in the oceans needs to be explained using events that can be visualised, or have maybe even been experienced.

From a communication viewpoint I have begun to think about how we can extend this kind of analysis, by using extreme events and icons to get the measure of .

You can multiply the heat released from the Black Saturday bushfires by 230 to get the energy absorbed into the ocean per day.

Or you can go even more nuclear to discover that the entire world stockpile of 24,300 nuclear weapons (2009 figures) is 25,000 Hiroshomas short of the daily global warming, but closer to the amount being absorbed by the oceans alone.

If these images are too difficult to imagine, we can go to pop culture itself. The Terminator films keep referring back to Judgement Day, where self-aware machines take control of nuclear weapons to extinguish 3 billion human lives. In the films future soldiers are sent back in time to prevent Judgement Day, kind of like politicians pledging to return carbon emissions to 1990 levels.

But the problem with global warming is that with that much heat going into the oceans, every day is Judgement Day.

Explore further: British scientists offer explanations on global warming pause

Related Stories

British scientists offer explanations on global warming pause

July 23, 2013

( —A team of climate experts from Britain's national weather service (The Met Office) has given a series of presentations at the Science Media Centre in London with the aim of trying to explain why global warming ...

Dire outlook despite global warming 'pause': study

May 19, 2013

A global warming "pause" over the past decade may invalidate the harshest climate change predictions for the next 50 to 100 years, a study said Sunday—though levels remain in the danger zone.

Climate change is impacting California, report says

August 8, 2013

Coastal waters off California are getting more acidic. Fall-run chinook salmon populations to the Sacramento River are on the decline. Conifer forests on the lower slopes of the Sierra Nevada have moved to higher elevations ...

Marine life spawns sooner as oceans warm

August 6, 2013

Warming oceans are impacting the breeding patterns and habitat of marine life, effectively re-arranging the broader marine landscape as species adjust to a changing climate, according to a three-year international study published ...

Recommended for you

Afromontane forests and climate change

January 17, 2019

In the world of paleoecology, little has been known about the historical record of ecosystems in the West African highlands, especially with regard to glacial cycles amidst a shifting climate and their effects on species ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (19) Aug 14, 2013
How we imagine climate change

How true.
1.3 / 5 (14) Aug 14, 2013
As foretold, the absorption of heat into the blessed and forgiving Water.
Be aware, that even the Water's forbearance is not infinite. Though the power of the most holy Element's avatar, the ice, is a thousandfold more powerful than unhallowed Fire, even the Water may be overwhelmed, just as ants may overwhelm the elephant or enough lies can be marshaled to overwhelm the truth.
The Alchemist
1.3 / 5 (15) Aug 15, 2013
Isn't this what I said, over and over, months ago. Except I only tallied mankind's contribution, not everything. That is about 10-50 nukes a day depending on heat efficiencies.
But just like I said, it is waste heat that goes straight into the Earth system and does not get released until it melts ice or is released at the poles-the definition of waste heat in the environment, practically.
Interesting metric for AGW, look at the heat flux at the poles... that'll be an accurate metric.
1.3 / 5 (16) Aug 15, 2013
Market research 101.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.