What corporations can learn from Microsoft

August 29, 2013

A failure to recognize and adapt to changes in mobile computing is what ultimately led to the most recent change at the top of Microsoft. But the blame should not fall solely on the shoulders of CEO Steve Ballmer, who recently announced his retirement, said David King, an associate professor of management at Iowa State University's College of Business. The problems are more a reflection of the long-standing corporate culture at Microsoft that can serve as a lesson for all businesses.

"Microsoft's weaknesses of being able to develop the Zune in response to Apple's iPod or any kind of or tablet, just shows that they haven't put the right emphasis and talent in areas where they can develop new things. It's more of a cultural problem," King said.

Instead of focusing on new technologies, Microsoft continued to invest money and talent in its Windows operating system. As King explains in his analysis of Microsoft's Surface Tablet, to be published in the Grazadio Business Review, the concentration on Windows became a weakness for the company, despite the fact that it is the most profitable Microsoft division. Not only did this lead to missed opportunities in the mobile arena, but the latest version of Windows missed the mark with both PC and tablet users.

"Microsoft deliberately killed some projects to steal the funds from more future-oriented things to focus on products they already had in place," King said. "Windows became a juggernaut. As a result Microsoft was not innovating something new, it was continuing to just refine Windows."

This trap is one many corporations fall into, but can be avoided using a basic known as SWOT analysis, King said. It starts with identifying a corporation's SWOT – strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The next step of the analysis is to match a weakness with an opportunity, for example, to develop a strategy for improvement.

In rapidly changing high tech fields, King said corporations should be conducting this kind of analysis on a monthly, if not weekly, basis. In the case of Microsoft, it might have led to greater diversification. King said it is not as critical for small businesses to diversify, but for large corporations it is essential.

"Most businesses don't survive beyond 40 years and that's largely because the business that they're in is essentially overtaken by changes. To survive long-term, for larger corporations, diversification is really important," King said.

Creating the next big thing

Diversification is not without risk, King admits, especially when a company may invest millions to develop a product that could potentially flop in the marketplace. King said it is a decision or a tradeoff that all corporations must make – whether to exploit an existing product or explore a new area.

However, failing to respond to change in consumer demand can prove to be more costly in the end. In the case of Microsoft, PC sales have continued to decline since the introduction of the tablet in 2010. And the company is still struggling to compete after pulling its mobile device, the Microsoft Kin, two months after it launched.

"Microsoft, by being focused on PCs, just completely ignored how that shift was happening with their customer base," King said.

In sticking with its core product, Microsoft is also watching its dominance slip away as it faces increased pressure from competitors, such as Google, that offer software for free. There are several examples, in both the private and public sector, of businesses or agencies that have failed to adapt to change.

King, a retired Air Force officer, said the F-22 fighter jet is just one of those examples. While he believes it will be the best manned-fighter jet built, the pilot is a major limitation to performance and a major part of aircraft development and production costs. The Air Force could have moved faster to shift to unmanned aircraft, he said.

In either case, King said the need for careful analysis is clear. Corporations need to think about and work through different situations and worst-case scenarios to anticipate change.

The next step for Microsoft

King anticipates plenty of change as Microsoft begins its search and hires Ballmer's replacement. He expects the company will bring in an external candidate for the job because Ballmer eliminated a lot of the potential candidates to promote from within. If the next Microsoft CEO comes from outside the company, King said he or she will face several challenges.

"It's much more challenging than having a relatively seamless handoff to an internal candidate," King said. "External hires are usually less successful because they don't have the credibility or the relationships. Their internal professional network with the corporation is minimal. For lower level employees there's a lot more uncertainty about what they're going to be asked to do."

Generally in these situations, King said an external hire will bring in a team of trusted people, which means changes in leadership for the different Microsoft divisions. The next leader will also face a tall order in creating new products and growth, but will have the advantage of Microsoft's financial resources to make that happen. The transition is one other can learn from.

"The lesson for other companies is that you really need to manage your leadership pipeline," King said. "Steve Ballmer had eliminated a lot of the potential contenders. In addition to starving other innovations, he starved Microsoft's leadership pipeline."

Explore further: At a Glance: Microsoft CEO Ballmer's ups and downs

Related Stories

At a Glance: Microsoft CEO Ballmer's ups and downs

August 24, 2013

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced on Friday that he plans to retire from the world's biggest software company after more than 13 years at its helm. Here's a look at the ups and downs of his tenure:

Windows 8.1 set for October 18 release

August 14, 2013

A tweaked version of Microsoft's Windows operating system which restores the "Start" button missed by users and updates other features will be available on October 18, the company said Wednesday.

Microsoft CEO sees Windows as key to growth plan

September 14, 2011

(AP) -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer expects the Windows operating system to be "front and center" in the software maker's growth strategy despite a recent slowdown in personal computer sales.

Windows is key to any Microsoft reshuffle, analysts say

July 12, 2013

A high-level management shakeup is expected at Microsoft Corp. in the coming days, and analysts expect the effort will expand upon Chief Executive Steve Ballmer's stated efforts to turn the software giant into a more nimble ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Aug 29, 2013
Stephen Elop head of Crokia phones, and ex-m$0ft, is top pick and would prove they have learned nothing
3 / 5 (2) Aug 29, 2013
Instead of SWOT analysis, HR should have been listening to outflowing talent--frustrated exMicrosoft employees could have told Ballmer before the share price slipped that the ship was sinking.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 29, 2013
All this means there should not be any CEO. Employees can tell you more about the direction a company is going if one listens.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.