Evolution of monogamy in humans the result of infanticide risk

July 29, 2013

The threat of infants being killed by unrelated males is the key driver of monogamy in humans and other primates. The study by academics from UCL, University of Manchester, University of Oxford and University of Auckland, is the first to reveal this evolutionary pathway for the emergence of pair living.

The team also found that following the emergence of males are more likely to care for their . Where fathers care for young, not only can they protect infants from other males, but they can also share the burden of childcare.

Dr Kit Opie (UCL Anthropology), lead author of the study published in the journal PNAS, said: "This is the first time that the theories for the evolution of monogamy have been systematically tested, conclusively showing that is the driver of monogamy. This brings to a close the long running debate about the origin of monogamy in ."

Infants are most vulnerable when they are fully dependent on their mother because females delay further conception while nursing slowly developing young. This leads to the threat from unrelated males, who can bring the next conception forward by killing the infant. Sharing the costs of raising young both shortens the period of infant dependency and can allow females to reproduce more quickly.

An additional benefit of sharing the burden of care is that females can then have more costly young. The considerable cognitive requirements of living in complex societies has resulted in many primate species having large, and costly, brains.

Growing a big is expensive and requires that offspring mature slowly. Caring fathers can help alleviate the burden of looking after young with long childhoods and may explain how large brains could evolve in humans.

Humans, uniquely among primates, have both very long childhoods and mothers that can reproduce quickly relative to other great apes. Until now, a number of have been proposed to explain the evolution of monogamy among . These include:

  • Paternal care, when the cost of raising offspring is high
  • Guarding solitary females from rival males
  • Infanticide risk, where males can provide protection against rival males

To uncover the evolutionary pathway the team gathered data across 230 . These were then plotted on a family tree of the relationships between those species. Bayesian methods were used to re-run evolution millions of times across the family tree to discover whether different behaviours evolved together across time, and if so, which behaviour evolved first.

This then allowed the team to determine the timing of trait evolution and show that male infanticide is the cause of the switch from a multi-male mating system to monogamy in primates, while bi-parental care and solitary ranging by females are a result of monogamy, not the cause.

Dr Susanne Shultz, from the University of Manchester, said: "What makes this study so exciting is that it allows us to peer back into our evolutionary past to understand the factors that were important in making us human. Once fathers decide to stick around and care for young, mothers can then change their reproductive decisions and have more, brainy offspring."

Explore further: Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity

More information: Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates , www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1307903110

Related Stories

Shorebirds prefer a good body to a large brain

July 18, 2013

In many animal species, males and females differ in terms of their brain size. The most common explanation is that these differences stem from sexual selection. But predictions are not always certain. A team of researchers ...

Why sticking around is sometimes the better choice for males

March 26, 2013

Researchers from Lund University and the University of Oxford have been able to provide one answer as to why males in many species still provide paternal care, even when their offspring may not belong to them. The study finds ...

Recommended for you

Humans, not climate change, wiped out Australian megafauna

January 20, 2017

New evidence involving the ancient poop of some of the huge and astonishing creatures that once roamed Australia indicates the primary cause of their extinction around 45,000 years ago was likely a result of humans, not climate ...

Major Viking Age manor discovered at Birka, Sweden

January 19, 2017

During spring of 2016 a number of large presumed house terraces were identified by the authors at Korshamn. As a consequence high resolution geophysical surveys using ground-penetrating radar were carried out in September ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2013
Monogamy is rare in mammals and humans are the only great ape to do it. Invading males do kill young in chimpanzee colonies but chimpanzees are not monogamous.

There is no evidence that the last common ancestor between chimps and humans was monogamous, nor any of the ancestor species.

Since when does wishful thinking qualify as science? The evidence clearly shows that human monogamy evolved AFTER the last common ancestor between chimps and humans.

And since when did modern humans reliably mate for life? To assure fidelity, discipline must be imposed via culture...did this evolve in ape ancestors as well???
4 / 5 (1) Jul 29, 2013
And since when did modern humans reliably mate for life? To assure fidelity, discipline must be imposed via culture...did this evolve in ape ancestors as well???

I think the point was monogamy during infancy, not for life.
2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 30, 2013
This is nonsense. In some cultures, men have multiple wives. It has nothing to do with evolution and more to do with whether or not it's culturally acceptable.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.