Sussex bee scientists question value of neonics ban

June 26, 2013 by Maggie Clune
Honey bee on Sedum.

The European Commission's two-year moratorium on the use of neonicotinoid insecticides is no "triumph for bee conservation", say University of Sussex bee scientists.

In fact, say Norman Carreck and Professor Francis Ratnieks from the university's Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects (LASI), scientific evidence both against and in favour of the ban is "far from clear-cut".

Norman Carreck has been keeping bees for more than 30 years and has been studying bee diseases for more than 20 years. Professor Ratnieks is the UK's only Professor of Apiculture.

Norman Carreck says: "It is not clear what purpose this two-year moratorium will serve, unless it is used to answer some of the outstanding questions."

In April 2013, the European Commission voted on and implemented a two-year moratorium on the use of three neonicotinoid insecticides on "bee attractive crops" following risk assessment reports from the European Food Standards Agency.

Neonicotinoids are a group of systemic insecticides used as a seed dressing for that has been linked with a decline in the numbers of both managed (honey bees) and wild (bumblebees, ) species.

Professor Ratnieks' and Mr Carreck's review of the research literature and the controversy surrounding neonicotinoids is published today (26 June 2013) in Research Fortnight.

Among the review's observations:

  • Bee population declines pre-date neonicotinoids by several decades, so they can't be the sole cause of decline. Declines are more likely due to a complex combination of changes, including and habitat loss.
  • Lab studies point to subtle sub-lethal adverse effects on bee brains, individual bees, or colonies, but so far these effects have not been seen in the field.
  • Existing lab and field studies, including those by universities and agencies such as the UK Government's Department of Food and Environment Rural Affairs (Fera) are inconclusive and few in number. The authors comment: "These experiments highlight areas that need attention, particularly the extent of wild bees' exposure to neonicotinoids. But even if governments can be persuaded to fund such work, it will be hard to design a research programme that will answer the question definitively owing to, for example, the fact that there are 250 bee species in the UK alone.
  • The neonicotinoids ban means that farmers who grow oilseed rape may well resume frequent insecticide spraying as occurred ten years ago, probably using synthetic pyrethroids. Little is known about the sub-lethal effects of this and other, older pesticides.

The authors conclude: "Many fundamental questions remain unanswered, and may still be so when the moratorium ends. We risk having the same debate in two years' time."

'Will a moratorium on save the ?', by Norman Carreck and Francis Ratnieks, will be published in print in Research Fortnight (26 June 2013), and will be freely available online at www.researchresearch.com

Explore further: Pesticides harm more than bees, says biologist's study

Related Stories

EU hints at insecticide ban over threat to bees

January 16, 2013

The European Commission hinted on Wednesday that it could ban several insecticides, some made by German chemicals giant Bayer, after scientists found disturbing evidence of harm to bees.

Lessons from the Italian ban on pesticides

May 3, 2013

Exposure to sub-lethal doses of neonicotinoids may have a long-term effect on bees. One of Italy's top bee researchers recommends a ban on insecticide-coated seeds and in reintroducing rotating cultures against pests invasion.

Lonely bees make better guests

June 18, 2013

Solitary bees are twice as likely to pollinate the flowers they visit as their more sociable counterparts, according to a new study.

Bees survival: Ban more pesticides?

May 3, 2013

Neonicotinoids are under intense scrutiny. But a ban of a broad variety of pesticides may be required to protect bees, humans and the environment.

Recommended for you

Knowledge gap on the origin of sex

May 26, 2017

There are significant gaps in our knowledge on the evolution of sex, according to a research review on sex chromosomes from Lund University in Sweden. Even after more than a century of study, researchers do not know enough ...

The high cost of communication among social bees

May 26, 2017

(Phys.org)—Eusocial insects are predominantly dependent on chemosensory communication to coordinate social organization and define group membership. As the social complexity of a species increases, individual members require ...

Darwin was right: Females prefer sex with good listeners

May 26, 2017

Almost 150 years after Charles Darwin first proposed a little-known prediction from his theory of sexual selection, researchers have found that male moths with larger antennae are better at detecting female signals.

Why communication is vital—even among plants and funghi

May 26, 2017

Plant scientists at the University of Cambridge have found a plant protein indispensable for communication early in the formation of symbiosis - the mutually beneficial relationship between plants and fungi. Symbiosis significantly ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.