Animals and humans—a false divide?

June 5, 2013, SAGE Publications

We don't just share our lives with animals; we are animals – a reality that we often choose to forget in modern Western culture. Research published in the June special issue of SAGE journal, Social Science Information (SSI), delves deeper into our relationship with other creatures, critically examining our own animal nature, and looking at how animals profoundly influence our culture – perhaps more so than we had initially thought.

We have often been told in Western thought that the human species is one that is highly developed, above that of the animal kingdom, a division that is clear cut and one that clearly sets the apart. Yet Dominique Lestel, a highly influential researcher studying animality (our animal nature), opposes the separation of human and . Lestel ask us to reframe the question of animality, asking us to view humanization as an ongoing performative practice, rather than an historical threshold that was crossed long ago.

Looking at the relationship between animal and human, Lestel argues that has both an ecological and symbolic consequence on our culture, as every species contributes to our very being, our meaning. He warns that "each species that disappears is a part of our imagination that we amputate perhaps irreversibly".

According to Lestel, the question is "not that of knowing how I share my life with others, but how others shape me and how I shape others," The work focuses on the interrelatedness of all animals (humans included), where more usually we tend to highlight the boundaries between us.

In addition to humans' place in the at a scientific level, Lestel also highlights our essential, existential animality in his opening comments with fellow editor, Hollis Taylor. "A key question now is to know how the human of the can reactivate his animality and animalize himself anew when all Western thought since the Greeks tells him that he is human precisely because of this rupture with animality," Lestel suggests, building on his critique of the very philosophical foundations of the ethological tradition. "To be human does not mean to have fled animality, but on the contrary to live within it and to let it live within us…we are animals and animals are us."

Explore further: Studies of evolving human societies overlook the role of animals

Related Stories

Symbolic saviour of an endangered species

May 16, 2013

In 2006 Berlin Zoo saw the birth of their first polar bear cub in 33 years. A retired circus polar bear gave birth to two cubs at the zoo. One of them died soon after, but Knut survived. At only a month old he became the ...

See spot see

March 2, 2013

(HealthDay)—It's a dog-see-dog world. With no sniffing involved, dogs can recognize the faces of other dogs among the faces of humans and other animal species, according to a new study.

Songbirds may give insight to nature vs. nuture

June 3, 2013

On June 3rd, JoVE will publish a research technique that allows neural imaging of auditory stimuli in songbirds via MRI. The technique, developed by Dr. Annemie Van der Linden and her laboratory at the University of Antwerp ...

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on ancient human-turkey relationship

January 17, 2018

For the first time, research has uncovered the origins of the earliest domestic turkeys in ancient Mexico. The study also suggests turkeys weren't only prized for their meat—with demand for the birds soaring with the Mayans ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (4) Jun 05, 2013
I'm glad to see science is finally taking on the false divide head on as it is a religiously rooted notion.

We are not animals, because the bible tells us so basically.

It should be no surprise that the American research is the one most biased against considering human beings animals, and insisting we cannot understand what animals want or need by looking in the mirror
4 / 5 (4) Jun 06, 2013
above that of the animal kingdom

For a given value of 'above'. It's always suspect when the winning species is the one that made up the criteria by which to judge.

a division that is clear cut and one that clearly sets the human species apart.

Are there really people that still think that (outside religious circles)?

Humans-animals is a quantitative difference, not a qualitative one (much like there is a quantitative difference for EVERY animal from the rest of the animals(including humans) nothing special in that, either)

It's sort of vexing thatit takes a lot of people so long to realize: we're not special - we're just different (like every other being out there). But I guess their minds won't allow that kind of 'fall'. Might hurt their precious little egos (in which case their in for a BAD day if they ever start looking at the sky)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.