New copyright rules hinder ability to 'unlock' phones, critics object

Imagine that the next time you buy a car, it's chock full of electronic gizmos and Web-linked software - cool stuff that, say, instantly warns you about a crash up ahead before you get stuck in traffic.

Not too hard, is it? Electronics and software are common in today's cars.

Now, imagine that before you drive off, the salesperson alerts you that the car's software is protected by an encrypted digital lock and circumventing that software - say, by taking your car elsewhere for service if your mechanic has to break that lock - could be against the law.

Corynne McSherry, of San Francisco's , says that troubling scenario isn't as far-fetched as it may sound. Instead, she says, it's easily comparable to the latest twist in rules limiting the ability of cellphone owners to take their phones to a different wireless carrier.

New U.S. Copyright Office rules that apply to phones purchased since Jan. 26 appear to make it illegal for phone owners or third parties to "unlock" a phone equipped with a digital lock installed by the carrier that sold it.

Although there's been some high-profile pushback - after 114,000 people signed a objecting to the rule, the Obama administration called for its reversal in early March - it's not clear what will happen.

"No one's actually brought this issue to court," McSherry says. But she and other opponents of the unlocking rule say the fight is just a skirmish in a larger battle over what she calls "a very dangerous law": 1998's (DMCA).

To its many critics, a key problem is a provision in the law that makes it generally illegal to break a product's digital encryption - unless the Copyright Office authorizes an exemption and renews it every three years. Phone-unlocking won such exemptions twice previously, most recently in 2009. But not this time - except for phones bought before the rule's effective date.

As a result of that same encryption provision, and the Copyright Office's reluctance to intervene, the DMCA is the law that blocks you from doing other things you'd probably consider perfectly reasonable, such as figuring out how to watch your DVD of "The Godfather" on your iPad during a long plane flight. Critics say the law has stymied electronic innovation, and has even blocked computer scientists from publicly discussing their research.

Why does phone-unlocking matter?

To you, it may not. If you've never been unhappy with your carrier, never moved to a place where its signal was weak, or never wanted to use your phone cheaply while traveling overseas, the issue may never even have come up.

But phone-unlocking arose to meet a need: consumer frustration in such circumstances. The last time I sought to unlock a phone was when my daughter was traveling to India - U.S. carriers charge exorbitant fees for overseas roaming.

The wireless industry itself has acknowledged the demand for unlocked phones - a fact that the Copyright Office, part of the Library of Congress, acknowledged. Some phones are now sold unlocked, albeit without the carriers' usual deep discounts, and carriers have become more willing to provide unlocking codes for older phones.

Ironically, the Copyright Office says the carriers' industry association didn't object "to a 'narrowly tailored and carefully limited exception' to permit individual customers of to unlock phones for the purpose of switching networks."

But the Copyright Office decided otherwise - as it also did against a proposal to allow an exemption for what it calls "space shifting": allowing people to break encryption on, say, a legally purchased DVD to watch its content on an iPad.

McSherry says the DMCA essentially gives the Copyright Office a "veto on innovation" and blocks perfectly lawful uses of devices or content that consumers have purchased.

"What they're protecting is the carriers' business model - that we're going to sell you a discount phone in exchange for selling you service," she says.

And that's not what copyright law is meant to protect.


Explore further

White House says phone 'unlocking' should be legal

(c)2013 The Philadelphia Inquirer
Distributed by MCT Information Services

Citation: New copyright rules hinder ability to 'unlock' phones, critics object (2013, March 15) retrieved 24 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-03-copyright-hinder-ability-critics.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 15, 2013
Imposed scarcity is the goal of every corporation, and it is epidemic in modern Capitalism.

In the form being discussed here it is obvious because a simple digital switch or digital conversion is all it takes to unlock the content.

In most other forms it takes the form of designs and parts that are specifically designed to fail without the ability for them to be replaced.

Automotive manufacturers play the game by constantly redesigning parts so that parts from model A don't fit in model B, therefore limiting the lifetime of the product to the lifetime of parts in the scrap yard.

Corporate manufactured and imposed scarcity is all around you.

Spend a minute pondering where and you will find multiple examples, all of which exist to extract more money from your pocket.

You are cattle. Corporations are the rancher.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more