Internet freedom not to be curbed, UN telecoms head says

December 3, 2012 by Ali Khalil
Internet freedom will not be curbed or controlled, the head of the UN telecommunications body, Hamadoun Toure (R), pictured here, said as a meeting to review the 24-year-old telecom regulations kicked off Monday.

Internet freedom will not be curbed or controlled, the head of the UN telecommunications body, Hamadoun Toure, said as a meeting to review the 24-year-old telecom regulations kicked off Monday.

Such claims are "completely (unfounded)," Toure, secretary general of the , told AFP.

"I find it a very cheap way of attacking" the conference, he said, as the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) set off in Dubai to review regulations reached in 1988.

Earlier, Toure told participants at the conference that the of expression will not be touched during the discussions at the meeting.

"Nothing can stop the freedom of expression in the world today, and nothing in this conference will be about it," he said.

"I have not mentioned anything about controlling the Internet."

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon who addressed the forum's opening by video underscored the importance of the meeting as a venue to enhance access to information and communication technology (ICT) across the globe.

"The overall objective is to ensure universal access to the benefits of information and communication technology, including the two thirds of the world's population currently not online," he said.

"We must continue to work together and find a consensus on how to most effectively keep cyberspace open, accessible, affordable and secure," he said.

has been vocal in warning of serious on the Internet if proposals made by member states are approved at the WCIT-12 meeting, including permitting censorship over legitimate content.

"Some proposals could permit governments to censor legitimate speech—or even cut off Internet access," said Bill Echikson, Google's head of in Europe, Middle East and Africa in a statement on Friday.

The is also arguing that the ITU, which is the for information communication technologies, is not the right body to address Internet issues.

"Although the ITU has helped the world manage radio spectrum and telephone networks, it is the wrong place to make decisions about the future of the Internet," Echikson said.

"Only governments have a vote at the ITU," he pointed out.

But Toure, whose Geneva-based organisation has 193 member states and over 700 private-sector entities and academic institutions, said that "consensus" is the way to make decisions at the agency.

He also dismissed claims that the meetings in Dubai were secretive, telling reporters that the sessions are open.

Google claimed in a blog post Monday that preliminary talks saw some "frightening proposals" discussed, including an Arab states' proposal to have the ITU take over the allocation of Internet Protocol (IP) addresses.

It warned such move "would cause duplication with the private sector ICANN," Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

However, ICANN's chief Fadi Chehadi, a guest speaker at WCIT-12 opening, said his organisation and the ITU complement each other.

"The ITU and ICANN have complementary roles, and moving forward, we shall cooperate in good spirit," he said.

Google said last week some proposed treaty changes "could increase and threaten innovation" and others "would require services like YouTube, Facebook, and Skype to pay new tolls in order to reach people across borders. This could limit access to information—particularly in emerging markets."

Google's comments backed the US position, which is that the non-government "multi-stakeholder" system of the Internet should remain in place.

But Toure, referring to the suggested fees dubbed as tolls, insisted to AFP that the meeting "is not about that... we are not discussing it."

The conference is hosted by the United Arab Emirates, one of the countries that censor Internet content, blocking political dissent and sexual material.

Explore further: Google enters debate on UN Internet control

Related Stories

Google enters debate on UN Internet control

November 21, 2012

Google has jumped into the debate over a UN telecom gathering set to review regulations affecting the Internet, claiming it is "the wrong place" to make decisions about the future of the Web.

Web access battles brew before UN conference

November 26, 2012

(AP)—An upcoming U.N. gathering about Internet oversight is raising alarms from a broad coalition of critics, including the U.S., tech giants such as Google and rights groups, concerned that changes could lead to greater ...

Clashes over Internet rules to mark Dubai meeting

December 3, 2012

The U.N.'s top telecommunications overseer sought Monday to quell worries about greater Internet controls emerging from global talks in Dubai, but any attempts for major Web regulations will likely face stiff opposition from ...

US says will oppose major revisions of global telecom rules

October 8, 2012

The United States will oppose any major revision to 24-year-old global telecommunications regulations at an international conference in December, the head of the US delegation said Monday, insisting the Internet must remain ...

A battle for Internet freedom as UN meeting nears

June 22, 2012

(AP) — A year after the Internet helped fuel the Arab Spring uprisings, the role cyberspace plays in launching revolutions is being threatened by proposed changes to a United Nations telecommunications treaty that could ...

Recommended for you

Semimetals are high conductors

March 18, 2019

Researchers in China and at UC Davis have measured high conductivity in very thin layers of niobium arsenide, a type of material called a Weyl semimetal. The material has about three times the conductivity of copper at room ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.1 / 5 (10) Dec 03, 2012
I'll take the judgment of Google and many others on this issue. We don't need the UN to "help" Internet freedom. It is already free.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 04, 2012
Google isn't opposing this summit because it supports internet freedom. It's opposing it because it wants more control itself so that it can suck more lovely ad revenue from search users, and it doesn't have a voice at this summit.

Don't be fooled by the lovely bright primary colour logo, Google is not your friend. The current monopoly they have on internet searches is a far greater threat to your internet freedom and privacy than a toothless UN conference could ever be.
2.6 / 5 (17) Dec 04, 2012
The UN protecting freedom is like a wolf protecting sheep.

That google dominates is a consequence of free competition. The notion that that is something that needs to be "fixed" is by its nature, counter to Internet freedom. Governments never grant more freedoms, they always take them away.

This leaning toward UN global governance in general, is a direction toward social engineering and redistribution of wealth, which means government control of human behavior, and defacto the regulation of freedom.

I think most Huffingtonpost members and OWS types have zero understanding of how liberal progressivism will control their lives. They will set loose an army of statisticians to regulate, ban, and tax everything their do-gooder mentality deem "needs to be fixed",... without ever considering that such social "ills" are a cost of FREEDOM.

Banning large sodas in restaurants is typical of that mentality and is the calm before the storm.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.