The Van Allen probes: Honoring the origins of magnetospheric science

November 12, 2012 by Karen C. Fox, NASA
A broad suite of instruments on the Van Allen Probes will help scientists understand more about the myriad types of particles and waves in the radiation belts that encircle Earth, providing a flood of new data for scientists who study the magnetosphere. Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center

(—Earth's magnetism has captured human attention since the first innovator noticed that a freely moving piece of magnetized iron would always align itself with Earth's poles. Throughout most of history, the origins and physics of this magnetism remained mysterious, though by the 20th century certain things had been learned by measuring the magnetic field at Earth's surface. These measurements suggested that Earth's magnetic field was consistent with that of a giant bar magnet embedded deep inside Earth. However, the magnetic field observed at the surface of our planet is constantly fluctuating. During the 1930s scientists pioneered explanations that such fluctuations were due to streams of particles from the sun striking and becoming entrapped within Earth's magnetic field.

Truly understanding Earth's magnetic environment, however, required traveling to space. In 1958, the first US rocket—known as Explorer 1 and led by James Van Allen at the University of Iowa—was launched. By providing observations of a giant swath of magnetized radiation trapped around Earth, now known as the Van Allen Belts, Explorer 1 confirmed that Earth's environment, the , was not a simple place. We now know that it has a complex shape – compressed on the side facing the sun, but stretched out into a long tail trailing off away from the sun—affected as much by incoming material from the sun as Earth's own intrinsic magnetism. This constantly fluctuates in response to both internal instabilities and events on the sun. It also provides a home for a host of electrified particles spiraling through this complex system.

A Scientific American article in 1963 said: "Conditions in the magnetosphere are so diverse and so variable . . . that millions of observations by scores of satellites and rocket probes have only begun to plot the broad outlines of this extension of the Earth into space." The age of magnetospheric science had begun, and it hasn't stopped yet. In 2012, those observations continue with the latest addition to NASA's heliospheric fleet: twin satellites launched on Aug. 30, 2012, originally named the Radiation Belt Storm Probes.

On Nov. 9, NASA announced that to honor the scientist who helped launched the field, the probes will be renamed the Van Allen Probes. The renaming comes simultaneously with a standard milestone for any NASA mission: the end of commissioning. Commissioning occurs after launch when all the instruments have been turned on and tested. The end of commissioning also marks the beginning of the prime science mission.

"We are excited to be honoring James Van Allen in this way," says David Sibeck, NASA's mission scientist for the Van Allen Probes at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "This is an important mission that carries on early magnetospheric work. In the past we have only had one spacecraft at a time looking at the radiation belts. The state-of-the-art instruments we have now are going to be able to comprehensively observe all the types of particles and waves in this part of the magnetosphere."

Indeed, the preliminary data returned from the Van Allen Probes' first two months already has scientists very excited. The instruments all meet or exceed mission specifications and some papers and publications are already planned based on just the first few weeks of observations.

The probes have a planned two-year mission, each with a similar orbit that will carry the spacecraft through all parts of the radiation belts. The basic goal of the mission is to understand what causes the belts to swell and shrink in response to incoming radiation from the sun. Such changes in the belts can endanger satellites in space that orbit near the belts.

To distinguish between a host of theories developed over the years on the radiation belts, Van Allen Probe scientists have designed a suite of instruments to answer three main questions. Where do the extra energy and particles come from? Where do they disappear to, and what sends them on their way? How do these changes affect the rest of the magnetosphere? In addition to its broad range of instruments, the mission will make use of its two spacecraft to better map out the full spatial dimensions of a particular event and how it changes over time.

Scientists want to understand not only the origins of electrified particles – possibly from the solar wind constantly streaming off the sun; possibly from an area of Earth's own outer atmosphere, the ionosphere – but also what mechanisms gives the particles their extreme speed and energy.

"We know examples where a storm of incoming particles from the sun can cause the two belts to swell so much that they merge and appear to form a single belt," says Shri Kanekal, the Van Allen Probes' deputy mission scientist at Goddard. "Then there are other examples where a large storm from the sun didn't affect the belts at all, and even cases where the belts shrank. We need to figure out what causes the differences."

Of course, just like Explorer 1, any new spacecraft will provide unexpected observations that can dramatically change the models and theories about a given region of space. The magnetospheric science that James Van Allen helped initiate will surely provide additional surprises as the Van Allen Probes sweep their way through the radiation belts.

Explore further: The electric atmosphere: Plasma is next NASA science target

Related Stories

The electric atmosphere: Plasma is next NASA science target

July 17, 2012

Our day-to-day lives exist in what physicists would call an electrically neutral environment. Desks, books, chairs and bodies don't generally carry electricity and they don't stick to magnets. But life on Earth is substantially ...

New NASA mission ready to brave Earth's radiation belts

August 10, 2012

( -- NASA's Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) mission will send two spacecraft into the harsh environment of our planet's radiation belts. Final preparations have begun for launch on Thursday, Aug. 23, from Florida's ...

The radiation belt storm probes

August 31, 2012

(—Since the dawn of the Space Age, mission planners have tried to follow one simple but important rule: Stay out of the van Allen Belts. The two doughnut-shaped regions around Earth are filled with "killer electrons," ...

Twin space probe design phase begins

April 21, 2008

The U.S. space agency said design has started on its radiation storm probes -- twin spacecraft that will be launched into the Earth's radiation belts.

Recommended for you

Neutron-star merger yields new puzzle for astrophysicists

January 18, 2018

The afterglow from the distant neutron-star merger detected last August has continued to brighten - much to the surprise of astrophysicists studying the aftermath of the massive collision that took place about 138 million ...

New technique for finding life on Mars

January 18, 2018

Researchers demonstrate for the first time the potential of existing technology to directly detect and characterize life on Mars and other planets. The study, published in Frontiers in Microbiology, used miniaturized scientific ...

North, east, south, west: The many faces of Abell 1758

January 18, 2018

Resembling a swarm of flickering fireflies, this beautiful galaxy cluster glows intensely in the dark cosmos, accompanied by the myriad bright lights of foreground stars and swirling spiral galaxies. A1758N is a sub-cluster ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (8) Nov 12, 2012
"A Scientific American article in 1963 said: "Conditions in the magnetosphere are so diverse and so variable . . . that millions of observations by scores of satellites and rocket probes have only begun to plot the broad outlines of this extension of the Earth into space." The age of magnetospheric science had begun, and it hasn't stopped yet."

Another example of a disingenuous and misleading press release that seeks to ignore and marginalize knowledge produced by those who produce research that contradicts the beliefs of the purveyors of the standard theory or would otherwise lead to a better understanding of the phenomenon we observe. Over a hundred years ago, Kristian Birkeland was researching and discovering many aspects of the Earth's magnetosphere using his 'Terella Experiments'. To truly understand any observed phenomenon, one needs to consider ALL of the available knowledge, not just that which supports your own POV.
3.4 / 5 (5) Nov 12, 2012
You know what? If you want to appear smarter than you are, you might want to try not writing such long run on sentences. Many words does not eloquence make.

PS: If 40 word sentences are necessary for you to get your point across (they aren't) you might want to use a proper subject/predicate structure.
5 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2012
"We need to figure out what causes the differences."

If I had to guess, the charge of the particles would dictate whether the field shrinks, grows or doesn't react at all. A CME featuring a wave of positive Ions interacting with the earth (base charge negative) would cause the field to swell and accelerate particle flow. A negative CME would disrupt the field, slow the particle flow and cause the field to shrink. We know CME's are caused by violent EM phenomena, the charge of the particles would be subject to the nature of the EM disturbance.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2012
the van allen belts are the most understudied subject in outerspace.

think about this. cosmologists who study the 'universe' outside our solar system, planetary scientists , and studies of the moon, and then the international space station occupy MOST of the science budget for space studies.

whereas---studying the sun directly (soho) and studies of near earth space like the magnetosphere that are directly attributed to reactions between earth and the sun are perhaps vastly more important to us on a practical level than studying other planets. there is a good argument that if all the nasa budget had to be cut for space studies, the only ONLY thing that should be salavaged is studies of our sun, our planet and near earth space.

these are strategically the most important subjects that will directly affect our planet (in addition to asteroids ---which studies of the asteroid belt and the oort cloud and generally search for small bodies in trans-earth orbits or paths) .

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.