Review: IPad Mini both delights and disappoints

November 6, 2012 by Troy Wolverton

I have mixed feelings about the iPad Mini, Apple's new pint-size tablet. I like its featherweight design, solid-feeling case and access to the entire library of appliciations available for the full-sized iPad. From those standpoints, it's worthy of its name and heritage, and many consumers are likely to love it.

But I'm disappointed by the Mini's high price, width, relatively low-resolution screen and a processor that's slower than the one in the bigger . In many ways, it feels like a typical first-generation Apple device: a fine product, but one with obvious shortcomings that the company will almost certainly address with future updates.

My advice is that unless you have an urgent need for a smaller iPad, you should hold out for next year's model.

The first thing you notice about the Mini is just how light it is. If you're used to holding the full-sized iPad, you'll immediately enjoy the difference. The Mini weighs less than half as much as the regular iPad.

It's also amazingly thin, thinner even than Apple's , which itself feels extraordinarily compact. That makes it a delight to hold. It's lighter than most books, so you can hold it in your hand for long periods without straining your arm. That's not something you could say about the bigger iPad.

Like the full-size iPad, the Mini comes with a metal case, not a plastic one like the Nexus and Kindle Fire, giving it a more solid and durable feel.

But perhaps the best part of the Mini is that it can access and run all of the 275,000 apps created for the bigger iPad. That app library is one of the key advantages of Apple's tablets over .

Users of other tablets have far fewer customized apps available to them; instead, most were designed for smaller screens. Such apps typically don't work as well on a bigger screen. In my tests, the bigger iPad programs translated well to the iPad Mini's smaller screen. The text, graphics and buttons are typically smaller, but I found them just as easy to use.

I found other things to like about the Mini. Unlike the Nexus 7 or the Kindle Fire HD, Apple's small tablet has a rear camera. I don't take a lot of pictures on tablets, but it's nice to have the option. And unlike the Kindle Fire HD, can soon buy a version of the iPad Mini that comes with a cellular data radio.

But I found other aspects of the Mini less compelling. It's a bit too wide to fit in most pockets, which makes it much less portable than the Nexus 7, say, or a typical e-reader. If you want to take it with you, you'll need a purse or bag of some kind.

Another shortcoming is that Apple appears to have cheaped out on some of the iPad Mini's components. Its processor is Apple's dual-core A5, which also powers the iPad 2 that Apple debuted 18 months ago. In speed tests I ran, the Mini performed significantly slower than the 5 and the newly updated full-size iPad.

You probably won't notice the difference on a day-to-day basis, but it could matter a lot in the not-so-distant future. With its older chip, the iPad Mini probably will stop being eligible for operating system updates long before the full-size iPad.

The Mini's screen is also subpar. Apple has been touting the "retina displays" of its recent devices, which are supposed to have resolutions so high that their individual pixels are invisible to the human eye.

The difference between a retina display and other screens isn't readily apparent - unless you've been using a device with one of the higher-resolution screens. If you have, you don't want to go back because the graininess of text and pictures on lower-resolution screens is obvious.

Apple's decision to not include a retina display with the Mini leaves the little tablet's screen outclassed by those of the HD and the 7.

But the Mini's biggest problem is its price. Apple may not like it, but Google and Amazon have set the expectation that small tablets ought to cost about $200, not more than $300.

As nice as the Mini is, it's hard for me to recommend paying $330 for it, especially when there's a good chance that the next version of the Mini will be significantly better.



-Troy's rating: 7.5 (out of 10)

-Likes: Thin, lightweight, solid-feeling design, access to large library of iPad apps, 5-megapixel rear camera, availability in two weeks of models with cellular data radios

-Dislikes: Pricey; too wide to fit in most pockets, slower processor than the full-size iPad, relatively low-resolution screen

-Specs: Dual-core Apple-designed A5 processor; 7.9-inch, 1024x768 display; 1.2 megapixel front and 5 megapixel rear cameras

-Price: Depending on storage capacity, Wi-Fi-only models range from $330 to $530 and cellular models range from $460 to $660.


Explore further: Apple sends out invites to Oct. 23 event

More information: Troy Wolverton is a technology columnist for the San Jose Mercury News.


Related Stories

Recommended for you

Volumetric 3-D printing builds on need for speed

December 11, 2017

While additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3-D printing, is enabling engineers and scientists to build parts in configurations and designs never before possible, the impact of the technology has been limited by ...

Tech titans ramp up tools to win over children

December 10, 2017

From smartphone messaging tailored for tikes to computers for classrooms, technology titans are weaving their way into childhoods to form lifelong bonds, raising hackles of advocacy groups.

Mapping out a biorobotic future  

December 8, 2017

You might not think a research area as detailed, technically advanced and futuristic as building robots with living materials would need help getting organized, but that's precisely what Vickie Webster-Wood and a team from ...

Lyft puts driverless cars to work in Boston

December 6, 2017

Lyft on Wednesday began rolling out self-driving cars with users of the smartphone-summoned ride service in Boston in a project with technology partner nuTonomy.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 06, 2012
If you read this review and decide not get the iPad Mini...then I believe you would be making a tremendous mistake.The display just is not that much different to a Nexus 7 when looked at side by side. Somehow all those extra pixels available on the Nexus, do not make a whole lot of difference when the screen looks washed out and the brightness is not as intense. They DO however make a big difference when you look up really close-much closer than is necessary for reading and gaming. They also make a big difference if you have already been told about the lack of retina as compared to the higher res Nexus. The iOS operating system also means that the processing power is at least same as the Nexus and usually better. Battery life is much better and so is gaming. Trust me-get the Mini if you can afford it. You will not be disappointed. I have purchased and tested virtually every tablet released in the last 5 years since tablets began appearing. This one is the best.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2012
I went ahead with iPad Mini without reading reviews but based on a few reasons: I have little access to my iPad1 and iPad2 as my children were using them most of the time. I am familiar with the iOS environment and there are tonnes of Apps from the iTunes store. Lastly, I enjoyed moving as light as I could, so iPad Mini is a natural choice (vs iPad4) for me.
not rated yet Nov 08, 2012
Hmm..2 posters who just signed up to write one comment each to support the iPad Mini.

That...smells funny. Apple must be building its own 50 cent army.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.