The genetics of molecular evolution

November 6, 2012
The latest findings in molecular evolution
Credit: Shutterstock

A team of scientists researching the effect of long-term molecular evolution (the study of DNA, RNA and proteins) have produced findings which suggest most amino-acid substitutions have different fitness effects in different species. This is an important breakthrough as there is now evidence to show that a genetic background determines whether a modification, which is the main factor regulating evolution at the level of proteins, is beneficial, harmful or inconsequential.

The work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and through the EU's Quantomics ('From sequence to consequence - tools for the exploitation of livestock genomes') project, which is under the 'Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology' Theme of the EU's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7). The findings are published in the science journal Nature.

The team of scientists was led by research Professor Fyodor Kondrashov, who is the head of the Evolutionary Genomics group at the Centre for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, Spain. The Professor uses computers for most of his work, analysing vast quantities of experimental data to see how different versions of genes arise. He studies genomes of from fish to birds to humans, to investigate the speed, effect and mechanisms of gene variance and evolution. In previous studies, he has found that which cause disease in one type of organism, may be harmless in another, and has been trying to work out the molecular details behind such differences.

Most scientists have assumed that in the short term having two identical copies of a gene has no effect on an organism's biology. However, Professor Kondrashov has always thought that such duplications are far more likely to be beneficial or harmful to an organism. This theory has now been confirmed with this latest research where scientists studied multiple alignments of at least 1,000 orthologues (different genes) with 16 proteins from species from a diverse evolutionary background.

The study of the factors determining the tempo and mode of molecular evolution continues to be at the forefront of evolutionary biology. Many studies have focused on the role of selection versus genetic drift in the fixation of amino-acid substitutions. Scientists are now certain that both, selection and genetic drift, contribute to a substantial fraction of all amino-acid substitutions in the course of evolution.

The study of molecular evolution is not a new area of research. In fact, it started in the early 20th century with 'comparative biochemistry'. However, molecular evolution only came into its own in the 1960s and 1970s, following the rise of molecular biology. After the 1970s, nucleic acid sequencing allowed to reach beyond proteins to highly conserved ribosomal RNA sequences, the foundation of a reconceptualisation of the early history of life.

Explore further: Two-step Process Filters Evolution of Genes of Human and Chimpanzee

More information: Breen, M. S., Kemena, C., Vlasov, P. K. Notredame, C. and Kondrashov, F. A., 'Epistasis as the primary factor in molecular evolution', Nature, 2012, 490, 535-538. doi:10.1038/nature11510

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Tiny protein coiled coils that self-assemble into cages

October 17, 2017

(—A large team of researchers with members from Slovenia, the U.K, Serbia, France and Spain has developed a technique that causes proteins to self-assemble into geometric shapes on demand. In their paper published ...

The importance of asymmetry in bacteria

October 17, 2017

New research published in Nature Microbiology has highlighted a protein that functions as a membrane vacuum cleaner and which could be a potential new target for antibiotics.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Nov 06, 2012
Isn't the balance of microRNA and messenger RNA responsible for the stochastic gene expression required for adaptive evolution via ecological, social, neurogenic, and socio-cognitive niche construction? If so, epistasis is achieved via the epigenetic effects of nutrient chemicals, which are balanced by the epigenetic effects of their metabolism to pheromones that control reproduction in species from microbes to man. The likelihood that individuals eat to survive and that their pheromones control reproduction of their species is not a novel idea. But perhaps I've made it too complicated in my most recently published work. Should I have titled it: Epistasis, instead of Human pheromones and food odors: epigenetic influences on the socioaffective nature of evolved behaviors. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 2: 17338.
not rated yet Nov 08, 2012
As long as you can test your claims. Not much of epigenetics is tested, AFAIK. Publishing away from biological journals, where say molecular evolution would fit, is a testament to that, I suppose.

And yes, the likelihood that surviving individuals eat is = 1. =D
1 / 5 (1) Nov 09, 2012
See for example my published works in Neuroendocrinology Letters (2001) and Hormones and Behavior (1996) and note the section titled "Molecular epigenetics" in the 12 y/o published work. Publishing in SNP came after a 2007 book chapter in the Handbook of the Evolution of Human Sexuality as an attempt to bring neuroscience to social scientists. And, also, the likelihood that pheromones control reproduction in surviving individuals is = 2 from the advent of nutrient chemical-dependent sexual reproduction in yeasts.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.