Radioactive decay of titanium powers supernova remnant

Radioactive decay of titanium powers supernova remnant
Ti-44 detection in SNR 1987A
(Phys.org)—The first direct detection of radioactive titanium associated with supernova remnant 1987A has been made by ESA's Integral space observatory. The radioactive decay has likely been powering the glowing remnant around the exploded star for the last 20 years.

Stars are like nuclear furnaces, continuously fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores. When stars greater than eight times the mass of our Sun exhaust their , the star collapses. This may generate temperatures high enough to create much heavier elements by fusion, such as titanium, iron, cobalt and nickel.

After the collapse, the star rebounds and a spectacular supernova explosion results, with these constituent elements flung into space.

Supernovae can shine as brightly as entire galaxies for a very brief time thanks to the enormous amount of energy released in the explosion.

After the initial flash has faded, the total luminosity of the remnant is provided by the release of energy from the natural decay of produced in the explosion.

Each element emits energy at some characteristic wavelengths as it decays, providing insight into the of the supernova ejecta – the shells of material flung out by the .

Radioactive decay of titanium powers supernova remnant
This image shows the patch of the sky surrounding the remnant of supernova remnant 1987A as seen in three different bands at high X-ray energies with ESA’s Integral. Titanium-44 is only present in the central image, which spans the 65–82 keV energy range. The panel on the left is based on data collected in the 48–65 keV band, whereas the panel on the right is based on data collected in the 82–99 keV band. The presence of signal corresponding to the position in the sky of SNR 1987A only in the energy range between 65 keV and 82 keV demonstrates that the signal does arise from emission at the specific wavelengths unique to the radioactive decay of Ti-44, at 67.9 keV and 78.4 keV. Also seen in the field of view are two other bright sources of high-energy emission, the black hole binary known as LMC X-1 and the pulsar PSR B0540-69. Credits: ESA/Integral/IBIS–ISGRI/S. Grebenev et al.

Supernova 1987A, located in one of the Milky Way's nearby , the , was close enough to be seen by the naked eye when its light first reached Earth in February 1987.

During the peak of the explosion, fingerprints of elements from oxygen to calcium were detected, representing the outer layers of the ejecta.

Soon after, signatures of the material synthesised in the inner layers could be seen in the of nickel-56 to cobalt-56, and its subsequent decay to iron-56.

Now, thanks to more than 1000 hours of observation by Integral, high-energy X-rays from radioactive titanium-44 in supernova remnant 1987A have been detected for the first time.

"This is the first firm evidence of titanium-44 production in supernova 1987A and in an amount sufficient to have powered the remnant over the last 20 years," says Sergei Grebenev from the Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Science in Moscow, and the first author of the paper reporting the results in Nature.

From their analysis of the data, the astronomers estimated that the total mass of titanium-44 that must have been produced just after the core collapse of SN1987A's progenitor star amounted to 0.03% of the mass of our own Sun.

This value is near the upper boundary of theoretical predictions and is nearly twice the amount seen in supernova remnant Cas A, the only other remnant where titanium-44 has been detected.

"The high values of titanium-44 measured in Cas A and SNR1987A are likely produced in exceptional cases, favouring supernovae with an asymmetric geometry, and perhaps at the expense of the synthesis of heavier elements," says Dr Grebenev.

"This is a unique scientific result obtained by Integral that represents a new constraint to be taken into account in future simulations for supernova explosions," adds Chris Winkler, ESA's Integral project scientist and co-author of the Nature paper.

"These observations are broadening our understanding of the processes involved during final stages of a massive star's life."


Explore further

X-ray illumination of supernova ejecta

More information: www.nature.com/nature/journal/ … ull/nature11473.html
Citation: Radioactive decay of titanium powers supernova remnant (2012, October 17) retrieved 15 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-10-radioactive-titanium-powers-supernova-remnant.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 17, 2012
Dismaying factual error about stellar evolution in the second sentence. Stars don't explode when they just fuse all their hydrogen - fusing of other elements comes after, though admittedly not for long.

Oct 18, 2012
Stars of less than 0.85 solar masses never leave the main sequence, they never fuse anything other than hydrogen.

Oct 18, 2012
@kron

those stars don't explode at all.. so what is your point?

Oct 18, 2012
A small star will expel its material content and form a planetary nebula.

It is like you're saying that when a water balloon bursts it isn't an explosion because when a grenade does it, it is more violent. All stars explode at the end of their lifetimes.

Some even come back to life. A star such as our own will form a white dwarf composed of helium and oxygen when it dies. If it passes through a galactic dust cloud it could accrete enough mass to spark back up, reigniting the fusion process once again.

Oct 24, 2012
Stars of less than 0.85 solar masses never leave the main sequence, they never fuse anything other than hydrogen.

Good thing the sentence in question says "When stars GREATER than eight solar masses..." which is why I pointed it out.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more