Economists find Yelp significant to restaurants

September 5, 2012 by Sarah Yang
Economists find Yelp significant to restaurants
UC Berkeley economists found that online reviews can boost a restaurant’s business.

(Phys.org)—For anyone who has wondered whether crowd-sourced online reviews make a dent in a business's bottom line, the answer is an unequivocal yes, according to a new study by UC Berkeley economists.

Researchers analyzed restaurant ratings on .com and found that, on a scale of 1 to 5, a half-star rating increase translates into a 19 percent greater likelihood that an eatery's seats will be full during peak dining times. The study, published this month in the Economic Journal, found that the increase is independent of changes in price or in food and service quality.

"This is the first study to link online consumer reviews with the popularity of restaurants," said study lead author Michael Anderson, assistant professor of agricultural and resource economics. "We show that social media sites and forums play an increasingly important role in how consumers judge the quality of goods and services."

Anderson and study co-author Jeremy Magruder, assistant professor of agricultural and resource economics, analyzed 148,000 Yelp reviews for 328 restaurants in the .

Because Yelp rounds off a business's average rating to the nearest half-star—a 3.74 average would mean 3.5 stars, while a 3.76 would bump the restaurant up to 4 stars—the researchers were able to isolate the impact of the rankings from the overall quality of the restaurant.

The study found that moving from 3 stars to 3.5 stars increases a restaurant's chance of selling out during prime dining times from 13 percent to 34 percent, and that moving from 3.5 stars to 4 stars increases the chance of selling out during prime dining times by another 19 percentage points. These changes occur even though restaurant quality is held constant.

Not surprisingly, the found that crowd-sourced reviews have a bigger impact when there is a lack of alternative information available by which to judge a restaurant's quality. When the researchers parsed the data further, they found that restaurants rated in popular guidebooks or newspaper rankings did not see a statistically significant effect from the Yelp rankings.

"If a restaurant has a Michelin star or it appears in the San Francisco Chronicle's list of Top 100 Restaurants in the Bay Area, the Yelp star becomes irrelevant," said Magruder. "Those restaurants are relatively famous, and consumers already know them. For that were not on those established reviews, we actually saw a 27 percent greater likelihood in filled seats during peak dining times with a half-star rating increase on Yelp."

Could these findings lead to potential manipulation of the ranking system for profit?

"We considered that possibility, and our study indicates that so far, such manipulation is under control," said Anderson. "There are enough reviews available that it would be difficult to generate enough fake positive to drown out the bad ones. There is also an element of self-policing since customers going to a restaurant on the basis of a good fake review only to be disappointed could submit a bad review. It could be hard for the business owner to sustain the false positives over time."

The researchers are now looking to expand their analysis to sites such as Amazon.com, Tripadvisor.com and Netflix.com.

Explore further: Microsoft's Bing adds Yelp to power local search

Related Stories

Google paid $125 million for Zagat: WSJ

September 9, 2011

Internet search and advertising giant Google paid around $125 million for restaurant review guide Zagat, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

Use texting as reminder

January 28, 2009

There are lots of things you hear while you're out that you might want to remember later, such as the name of a movie to rent, restaurants to try or shows to program on the DVR.

Yelp shares surge in stock market debut

March 2, 2012

(AP) -- Yelp's stock opened to five-star reviews from investors on Friday, soaring 60 percent in the first hour of trading after pricing at $15 on Thursday night.

Recommended for you

Study into who is least afraid of death

March 24, 2017

A new study examines all robust, available data on how fearful we are of what happens once we shuffle off this mortal coil. They find that atheists are among those least afraid of dying... and, perhaps not surprisingly, ...

Scientists make new discovery about bird evolution

March 24, 2017

In a new paper published in National Science Review, a team of scientists from the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, the Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature, and the Nanjing Institute of Geology and ...

Mathematical framework explains diverse plant stem forms

March 23, 2017

It is well known that as plants grow, their stems and shoots respond to outside signals like light and gravity. But if plants all have similar stimuli, why are there so many different plant shapes? Why does a weeping willow ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Sep 06, 2012
"Could these findings lead to potential manipulation of the ranking system for profit?" Very much so: the findings suggests faking reviews will matter even in a large pool of honest ones since just adding a few fake ones could change a 3.74 average with 3.5 stars to a 3.76 average with 4 stars and a profitable 19% increase in full seating during peak times.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.