Leap second to be added

Leap second to be added
Credit: iStockphoto

A leap second will be introduced on 30 June 2012 following a decision made by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) earlier this year. This could potentially be one of the last ever leap seconds added, as a decision may be made in the next few years to abolish the practice.

Leap seconds are added to Co-ordinated Universal Time (UTC) to keep the time scale from within one second of that determined by the rotation of the Earth. The time scale produced by atomic clocks is much more stable and reliable than that based on the Earth's rotation, and without adjustments the two would diverge by ever increasing amounts.

There is ongoing debate over whether or not to abolish leap seconds and allow atomic time to gradually drift away from . For now, a decision has been deferred until 2015, but if agreement is reached then to abolish the leap second, the second added on 30 June 2012 could be one of the last.

Some countries have proposed that leap seconds should be abolished because of the difficulties they cause for systems reliant on precise timing, and the time and effort needed to programme them manually into equipment, with the resulting risk of human error. They also argue that the need for predictable timekeeping outweighs that for a link between civil timekeeping and the Earth's rotation.

However, other countries argue that the current leap second system works adequately for the majority of users and the international community needs to be absolutely sure about the long term consequences before making any potentially irreversible changes to it.


Explore further

'Leap second' under the gun at Geneva time talks

Citation: Leap second to be added (2012, June 29) retrieved 31 March 2020 from https://phys.org/news/2012-06-added.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments