Sumatra earthquake mysteries examined

May 11, 2012 by Lin Edwards report
Topographic map of Sumatra. Image: Wikipedia.

( -- An earthquake in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia on 11th April was unusually powerful, at magnitude 8.6, for a “strike-slip” type of quake, and a new analysis of the earthquake and its 8.2 magnitude after-shock has proposed that some of the assumptions made about earthquakes may need re-thinking.

A strike-slip is one in which there is an almost vertical rupture, leading to two plates sliding horizontally past each other. The San Andreas Fault in California produces strike-slip earthquakes, and the most powerful earthquake along this fault was the San Francisco quake of 1906, which measured 7.8.

Events as powerful as the earthquake are usually caused by ruptures in subduction zones, in which the edge of one tectonic plate slips underneath the edge of the adjoining plate. An earthquake of this type on the sea bed can cause massive tsunamis because of vertical displacement of water above the point of slippage. A recent example was the 9 earthquake off Japan last year.

The Sumatra earthquake’s magnitude surprised scientists because it was the most powerful strike-slip earthquake ever recorded. The quake was also unusual in that the rupture was in the middle of an oceanic plate rather than at the boundary between two plates. The slippage distance was surprisingly large; the 1906 San Francisco earthquake produced a slippage of 4.5 meters, while in Sumatra the distance was 21.3 meters.

Seismologists Jeffrey McGuire of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and Gregory Beroza of Stanford University’s Department of Geophysics discuss the Sumatran earthquake in the May 10th issue of Science. McGuire said that many large earthquakes have occurred away from the edges of oceanic plates in the last few years, but they generally do not cause damage or threaten lives because they are at sea and are unlikely to cause large tsunamis unless they result in submarine landslides.

The lack of monitoring networks on the sea bed makes understanding these earthquakes difficult, but the researchers said the seismology readings from the Sumatra earthquake suggest the quake was unusually deep at 40-53 km (25-33 miles). At this depth the rock could reach up to 800 degrees Celsius and become viscous in places, and melting of fault zones is also possible, leading to the release of enormous amounts of energy.

Professor Beroza said analyzing the Sumatran earthquake could shed some light on earthquakes occurring in the middle of continental plates as well as oceanic plates, and the findings suggest this type of earthquake could be of greater magnitude in continental plates than scientists had previously thought.

Sumatra lies on the “Ring of Fire” around the Pacific Basin, a particularly active region for seismic and volcanic events.

Explore further: 'Odd duck' Indonesia quake surprises scientists

More information: A Rogue Earthquake Off Sumatra, Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1223983

A magnitude 8.6 strike-slip earthquake within an oceanic plate raises fundamental questions about earthquake physics.

Related Stories

Quakes warn of seismic danger closer to home

April 8, 2005

More earthquakes along the fault that caused the Boxing Day and Easter Monday earthquakes are “inevitable” and may cause shocks and tsunamis close to north-western Australia. Dr Wouter Schellart, who is working on modelling ...

Fewer earthquake fatalities in 2005

January 14, 2006

There were fewer deaths worldwide in 2005 due to earthquakes, but almost 90,000 casualties were reported, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.

GPS data reveals more on mega-thrust earthquakes

April 29, 2011

( -- New GPS data of the 2010 earthquake that devastated parts of Chile and killed over 500 people is revealing new clues about large earthquakes such as the quake in Chile and the magnitude 9.0 earthquake that ...

Sumatra earthquake three times larger than originally thought

February 8, 2005

Northwestern University seismologists have determined that the Dec. 26 Sumatra earthquake that set off a deadly tsunami throughout the Indian Ocean was three times larger than originally thought, making it the second largest ...

Recommended for you

Heavy oils and petroleum coke raising vanadium emissions

December 15, 2017

Human emissions of the potentially harmful trace metal vanadium into Earth's atmosphere have spiked sharply since the start of the 21st century due in large part to industry's growing use of heavy oils, tar sands, bitumen ...

Climate change made Harvey rainfall 15 percent more intense

December 14, 2017

A team of scientists from World Weather Attribution, including researchers from Rice University and other institutions in the United States and Europe, have found that human-caused climate change made the record rainfall ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 11, 2012
If this is the type of earthquake that can normally cause massive tsunamis, why was there no tsunamis?
not rated yet May 11, 2012
We can ask instead, why tsunami was there in 2004. For example in some conspiracy theories the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami could have been caused by an Indian nuclear experiment.
5 / 5 (2) May 11, 2012
If this is the type of earthquake that can normally cause massive tsunamis, why was there no tsunamis?

This type slips horizontally, so there is no upward force (vertical displacement) producing the tsunami wave.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.