Australians 'may have to choose what to save'

May 29, 2012, University of Queensland

The responsibility for choosing which Australian native species survive – and which go extinct – may ultimately fall to ordinary Australians.

The dilemma over how much of Australia we will pass on to our grandchildren cannot be solved by science – but only by society, one of the nation's leading ecologists, Professor Hugh Possingham, warned today.

Prof Possingham, who is director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) at The University of Queensland, said that world-first Australian research was showing that it was now possible to estimate how many can be saved based on how much was spent on protecting them and their habitats.

“For the first time ever, we are starting to get a handle on the return on investment from conservation,” he said.

“However, this also clearly shows that, at current levels of funding and current rates of extinction, we won't be able to save everything.

“Then it will come down to a public decision about what kind of Australia we really want, which native species we should strive to keep – and how many we feel we can afford to let go.”

Groundbreaking research by Dr Michael McCarthy and colleagues at Melbourne University had shown that an annual national investment of just $10m a year could reduce the number of threatened Australian bird species from around 270 to 230 over 80 years, he said. Even then a few species would be lost.

“This is the first clear evidence, probably worldwide, how much it costs to save species. However the amount of $10m is roughly three times what we currently spend nationally on bird conservation.

“It seems like a trivial amount to secure Australia's avifauna which is currently disappearing at about 100 times the ‘background rate'.

Basically it comes down to a decision whether we lose a bird a decade – or a bird every century.”

In a situation where environmental funding remains tight it will be necessary for Australians to take hard decisions, Professor Possingham said.

“For example, are we wasting scarce money trying to save some species from extinction?

"Should we instead put more effort into saving those with better prospects of survival?

“These are not questions that science can answer: they come down to our values as a society.”

In another groundbreaking CEED study, Dr Josie Carwardine, Dr Tara Martin and colleagues estimated it would cost the nation $40 million a year to protect 45 mammals, birds and reptiles from extinction in the Kimberley.

“We now know what it will cost to protect Australia's last region with an intact native fauna," Professor Possingham said.

"The question we must decide is whether we are willing to make the necessary investment.”

Even more difficult for the public were decisions about protecting things like unique native grasslands and the obscure plants and insects they harboured.

“When people see these, do they realise it is a complex and unique Australian ecosystem – or do they just see grass?” he said.

With such problematical decisions ahead of them, Australians urgently needed to learn a lot more about their native land – and the rare animals and plants that inhabited it, Professor Possingham said.

“I take people on bird walks through the suburbs of Brisbane – and they are astonished to see or hear as many as 70 species of native birds in two hours.

We all need to open our eyes more to the wonderful Australia that surround us.

"Europeans and Americans are amazed to see the wildlife that we take for granted.”

Explore further: Yes, Australia can save its native woodland birds: study

Related Stories

Scientists find new Australian frog

July 26, 2011

( -- A new miniature frog species or ‘toadlet’ has been discovered in the resource-rich Pilbara region of Western Australia, an area previously thought to support very few of the amphibians.

Extinction threat for 45 Australian species

March 23, 2011

Up to 45 rare species of wallaby, bandicoot and other Australian animals could become extinct within 20 years unless urgent action is taken to control introduced predators and other threats, scientists warned Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Brewing hoppy beer without the hops

March 20, 2018

Hoppy beer is all the rage among craft brewers and beer lovers, and now UC Berkeley biologists have come up with a way to create these unique flavors and aromas without using hops.

Why aren't humans 'knuckle-walkers?'

March 20, 2018

Our closest biological relatives, the African apes, are the only animals that walk on their knuckles; CWRU researchers discovered why

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) May 29, 2012
Extinction is a part of nature. One species declines another replaces it. It is not possible for us to decide what will survive or not. Many of the species native to Australia are only at risk because of the European invasion if we truly want to save Australian fauna and flora all those of european decent should leave and take all their 'improvements' with them as it is these that are threatening the native environment just as it threatened the native people. And That isnt going to happen is it. That Australian Government wants to have their cake and eat it. Oh By the way I am an Australian and a Queenslander (from Brisbane)and English by descent.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.