Probing Question: How well do we predict floods?

October 5, 2011 By Melissa Beattie-Moss

There was no Ark involved and it didn’t last 40 days -- but when the remnants of Tropical Storm Lee dumped more rain on the already saturated Northeast, the result was the Susquehanna River’s worst flooding in nearly 40 years. Thousands were evacuated, a number of lives were lost, and damage to homes and businesses is said to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Given that floods are the most common natural disaster in the United States, could we be doing more to predict them and safeguard flood-prone communities?

“We are continuing to improve forecasts but we have more work to do,” said Chris Duffy, Penn State professor of civil engineering. There are several key problems, he noted.

One issue is that “many models still do not adequately take into account the physical landscape features or land-use changes that shape the flood response,” said Duffy.

Much of today’s flood prediction technology relies on computer models created by simulation software that can be customized to a region’s rivers, floodplains, and urban features. These programs use “flood routing algorithms”-- mathematical formulas for predicting the changing magnitude, speed and shape of a flood wave along a river -- as their main predictive tool. Yet, “Models cannot be expected to perform well unless they are based on the best historical data,” reminded Duffy.

“One of the serious problems,” he said, is the continued loss of that data. “The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has a hard time convincing Congress to maintain funding for the national network of streamgages,” a system with over 7,000 devices in American rivers that measure real-time water levels and transmit data back to USGS every few hours. “State and local governments also are cutting back on support for this network,” Duffy added.

The best flood forecasting is costly, he acknowledged. “Some areas of the country are adopting new technologies to gauge river flow based on acoustic and radar methods. However, these methods require an investment which seems to be hard to come by.”

Typically, Duffy notes, flood prediction methods have focused on the main stems of the largest rivers, while overlooking the tributary networks where flooding occurs, and where flash floods threaten lives and property.

“It is my opinion that we will not improve flood and drought prediction in the U.S. until we begin to look beyond the stream and include measurements that tell us about the state of the entire watershed,” he said. “We must look beyond the point where flooding takes place to see what happened upstream in the watershed. New measurements for soil moisture, groundwater levels, coordinated with current rainfall radar and stream measurements would greatly improve our ability to forecast.”

Said Duffy, “At Penn State researchers are attempting to develop the next-generation forecasting tools that take a more scientific approach to flood/drought forecasting. These models will include spatial features of topography, land-use, and vegetation, incorporating satellite data and new watershed instrumentation as part of a Critical Zone Observatory funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, and the Environmental Protection Agency.”

Predicting floods more accurately is not our only task, reminds Duffy. We can also do a better job with our urban and land use planning. “The land surface is the interface between the atmosphere and the soil and subsurface,” he explained. “When we change that surface by making it less permeable or less able to store rain water temporarily in the soil or groundwater, we change the likelihood for surface flooding,” he noted. “Local floods due to poorly designed culverts can get you just as wet as a large river flood.”

The Susquehanna is a good case in point, said Duffy. “The physiography of the watershed of the river basin, along with shallow bedrock rivers that want to spread out and leave their banks, has always been recognized.” What is often not recognized, he pointed out, are the impacts of land-use changes (such as dams and pavement) that have altered the water cycle and changed where the water goes. “I think the best thing we can do is to educate the public on the scientific basis for the water cycle, including all its uncertainty.”

Explore further: Flooding will only worsen unless river management improves, hydrogeologist says

Related Stories

On ancient Susquehanna, flooding's a frequent fact

September 10, 2011

(AP) -- Early settlers called the Susquehanna River "a mile wide and a foot deep." It's just a folk saying, but it hints at the forces behind a river that is, in fact, exceptionally likely to flood.

Weeds and the Murray

February 15, 2011

( -- A new study has revealed that human-induced changes in the flow of the Murray River has led to mass weed invasion and reduced biodiversity in wetlands along the riverbank, highlighting the need for a review ...

Mississippi diverted to revive Delta wetlands

June 9, 2011

Wetlands around the city of New Orleans are disappearing at such an alarming rate that a University of South Carolina coastal marine scientist predicts there will be little of the marshland left by the end of the century.

Recommended for you

New research could predict La Nina drought years in advance

November 16, 2017

Two new studies from The University of Texas at Austin have significantly improved scientists' ability to predict the strength and duration of droughts caused by La Niña - a recurrent cooling pattern in the tropical Pacific ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.