Author says presidential primary debates allow audiences for candidates, can influence election

September 14, 2011 By LeAnn Brazeal, Kansas State University

( -- Primary debate season, an important time in each presidential election, is under way, and a Kansas State University political communication expert says these debates can influence the direction of the election.

LeAnn Brazeal, associate professor of , is the co-author of the book "The Primary Decision: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Primary Debates." Brazeal said that despite the changes the debate format has undergone, it has several enduring characteristics. This includes that having numerous, often colorful can complicate voters understanding of their politics. This can appeal to the debate's primary audience: party faithful.

"People who identify strongly with a party's ideology are most likely to vote in primary elections," Brazeal said. "Candidates campaign more to the left or right in the primaries, while the discourse shifts toward the center in the general election."

Appealing to voters of the same ideology can create some terse situations between candidates. Candidates engage in more attacking and defensive discourse in debates than in television spots, Brazeal said. This is often because candidates are unable to resist responding to one another in a live forum. For Republicans, the philosophy runs counter to that of one of the party's favorite leaders.

"Ronald Reagan famously proclaimed the 11th commandment, 'Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican,' but our research suggests that candidates do not follow it," Brazeal said.

Historically, there are a variety of successful approaches in primary debates. Strong records of accomplishment help offer proof of the ability to lead. Likewise, experience as a governor can be an asset for executive decision-making, familiarity with budgets and possible success of agendas. The increased focus on policy issues combined with the aforementioned approaches play well to certain candidates in 2012, Brazeal said.

"Rick Perry, for example, could boast that he handled a state economy that is the 15th largest in the world and this qualifies him to work with the federal budget," Brazeal said.

Front-runners may choose an above-the-fray posture, where they present themselves with an extra measure of dignity and speak as though already anointed; this can also be a successful strategy, Brazeal said.

Although potential policies receive greater attention during debates, the rhetoric does not change much. Brazeal and her co-authors found that candidates mostly spoke in generalities during the campaign rather than offer specifics. Political communication itself also remains tightly controlled, with candidates offering the same message consistently -- and not always succeeding. She said this is important to remember in a technologically connected world.

"A candidate's outburst or mishap is sure to be uploaded and viewed a million times and perhaps even picked up by more traditional news outlets," Brazeal said.

All of these factors reinforce the importance of the primary debates, she said. Viewers make decisions about each candidate's policies and their character. Voters who watch the primary debates are more confident in their decisions than those who do not. The stakes can be sizable.

"A good debate performance, especially one that exceeds expectations, can bump the candidate in the polls and create some momentum," Brazeal said. "Debate performances can draw media attention to lesser-known candidates and pique public interest, especially if the debates dovetail with campaign ads."

But the complexity of campaigns can sometimes mean a strong debate performance is not enough. The potential for scandals and crises along with a fickle public present a host of challenges, Brazeal said.

"Effective is powerful and important, but it's no guarantee," she said.

Explore further: Viewers will receive greatest benefit in presidential town hall debate

Related Stories

Presidential debates are mostly positive and emphasize policy

September 24, 2008

Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain are preparing for their first presidential debate this week. William Benoit, one of the nation's leading experts on political campaigns at the University of Missouri, says ...

MU professor analyzes presidential debates

October 21, 2008

Now that the general election debates are over, University of Missouri Professor of Communication Willliam Benoit has analyzed the content of the three encounters between Senators McCain and Obama. He found that, overall, ...

Gender is a relative term in politics, study finds

September 30, 2008

For only the second time in presidential debate history, a female nominee will take the stage to spar with a male opponent. While Geraldine Ferraro broke new ground in 1984, it has taken 24 years for another female to be ...

Recommended for you

A statistical look at the probability of future major wars

February 22, 2018

Aaron Clauset, an assistant professor and computer scientist at the University of Colorado, has taken a calculating look at the likelihood of a major war breaking out in the near future. In an article published on the open ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 15, 2011
just DO NOT mention Ron Paul - that is the litmus test of MSM and its power to hand-pick candidates for the United Sheeple of Amerika

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.