Quantum correlations -- without entanglement

August 24, 2011 by Miranda Marquit, Phys.org feature

(PhysOrg.com) -- Few people doubt the "quantumness" of entanglement. Quantifying the quantum correlation of entanglement is something that is relatively regular right now. However, things change a bit when it comes to quantum correlations other than entanglement. However, there is a growing interest in the use of non-entanglement quantum correlations in a number of possible future applications.

“A few years ago, scientists proposed quantum discord as a quantum correlation measure that goes beyond the entanglement paradigm,” Roberto Serra tells PhysOrg.com. “Quantum discord may be present, even in separate, non-entangled states. However, some doubt was being shed on the quantum qualities of non-entangled states because of the difficulty in quantifying the correlations.”

In order to remedy the difficulty in “seeing” the correlations in a laboratory setting, Serra, a scientist at the Federal University of ABC in São Paulo, Brazil, worked with a group to create a technique that makes it possible to recognize nonclassical correlations in quantum discord. Serra worked with a team from different Brazilian institutions of higher learning, including the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation's and the Brazilian Center for Physics Research both in Rio de Janeiro, and the Physics Institute of São Carlos, in São Paulo State. The results of the work can be seen in : Experimentally Witnessing the Quantumness of Correlations.”

“Nuclear Magnetic Resonance systems at room temperature were used to test principles of quantum computation with a good level of success,” Serra explains. “The quantum nature of these demonstrations was questioned because there is no entanglement in such a system. In our experiment we reveled directly the quantum nature of this system at room temperature. We used a sample of chloroform molecules, since it’s the simplest two-qubit system. We folded a qubit in the carbon nucleus and another one in the hydrogen nucleus.”

Next the Brazilian scientists were able to manipulate the system. Even though they used hot quantum bits, the system actually works as a quantum mechanical one. “We displaced the system from the thermal equilibrium by a very tiny deviation, and the phase coherence present there could encode as the measured by the quantum discord,” Serra says.

“Our methods can be applied to another system, such as an optical system. This can enable us to say if a given system is purely classical in nature, or if it has truly quantum correlations,” he continues. Serra thinks that using this test, which is relatively simple to perform in a laboratory setting, could help lay to rest the debate over whether or not these other types of correlations are truly quantum.

“We test the quantumness of discord at , and this very robust quantumness can be used to get an advantage in quantum protocols,” Serra insists. He believes that this method can already be used for metrology. “We are involved now in a test of principles in quantum metrology using this type of system, and exploiting this very tiny nonclassical correlation. We are testing those right now, to see about advantages over classical protocols, and we hope to have new results in the next few months.”

“We hope to develop future applications, and advance our comprehension about the rule played by this kind of quantumness in tasks as, for example, quantum communications,” Serra continues. “We are building collaborations between theoretical and experimental researchers, and we hope that we can do more to show the usefulness of other quantum correlations beyond .”

Explore further: Simplifying the process of detecting genuine multiparticle entanglement

More information: R. Auccaise, J. Maziero, L.C. Céleri, D.O. Soares-Pinto, E.R. deAzevedo, T.J. Bonagamba, R.S. Sarthour, I.S. Oliviera, and R.M. Serra, “Experimentally Witnessing the Quantumness of Correlations,” Physical Review Letters (2011). Available online: link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.070501/


Related Stories

Entanglement can help in classical communication

March 30, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- When most of us think of entanglement, our minds jump immediately to quantum communication. "Entanglement has become very well known and useful in quantum communication," Robert Prevedel tells PhysOrg.com. ...

Large scale qubit generation for quantum computing

July 27, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Many people are trying to build a quantum computer," Olivier Pfister tells PhysOrg.com. "One to the problems, though, is that you need hundreds of thousands of qubits. So far, scalability has been something ...

Too much entanglement can render quantum computers useless

May 25, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- "For certain tasks, quantum computers are more powerful than their classical counterparts. The task to be performed is the same for quantum or classical systems. However, the former ones can do it in a more ...

Reducing noise in quantum operation at room temperature

August 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "A quantum memory is a crucial component of future quantum information processing technologies. Among these technologies, a quantum communications system based on light will enable vastly improved performance ...

Recommended for you

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.

ATLAS experiment observes light scattering off light

March 20, 2019

Light-by-light scattering is a very rare phenomenon in which two photons interact, producing another pair of photons. This process was among the earliest predictions of quantum electrodynamics (QED), the quantum theory of ...

How heavy elements come about in the universe

March 19, 2019

Heavy elements are produced during stellar explosion or on the surfaces of neutron stars through the capture of hydrogen nuclei (protons). This occurs at extremely high temperatures, but at relatively low energies. An international ...

Trembling aspen leaves could save future Mars rovers

March 18, 2019

Researchers at the University of Warwick have been inspired by the unique movement of trembling aspen leaves, to devise an energy harvesting mechanism that could power weather sensors in hostile environments and could even ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.8 / 5 (5) Aug 24, 2011
Could someone explain "quantum discord"? I 'get' that the indication of such is the disparity between two descriptions of the same classical system. Apparently, this is a relatively new notion in physics and I don't think I really understand it, even at a basic level.
5 / 5 (2) Aug 24, 2011
Could someone explain "quantum discord"? I 'get' that the indication of such is the disparity between two descriptions of the same classical system. Apparently, this is a relatively new notion in physics and I don't think I really understand it, even at a basic level.

Seconded. I can't make heads or tails of the thing. As far as I can tell it's maybe mild-entanglement, but thats really not it at all.
not rated yet Aug 25, 2011
Could someone explain "quantum discord"? I 'get' that the indication of such is the disparity between two descriptions of the same classical system. Apparently, this is a relatively new notion in physics and I don't think I really understand it, even at a basic level.

Don't quaote me, and I could be wrong (not having read the source materiel), but I believe what they are trying to say is that they have figured out a way to entagle two different quantum states, as opposed to classic entagnlement, where the the same states of two atoms are entagled.

The article could use a rewrite.
4 / 5 (1) Oct 07, 2011
the classical terms for Mutual information are I(X:Y)=H(X) H(Y) - H(X,Y) and also, J(X:Y)=H(X) - H(X|Y);
these two formulas are equivalent in classical regime and are equal to theamount of correlation X-Y.

now when we come to quantum regime
I(A:B) = total (classical quantum) correlation.
J(A:B) = amount of correlation after we measure one of our bipartite system.also I>=J, since, in J(A:B)=H(A) - H(A|B) , the second term require measurement and entropy is non decreasing if the measurement is projective(Neilson and chuang book);
quantum discord(QD) = I(A:B)-{maximized over some set of operators}J(A:B) = amount of correlation lost in measurement,
also QD>=0;
so if QD = 0; we can say that no correlation is lost in meameasurement, hence the amount of information that exists about system A that exists in A-B correlation is locally recoverable measuring system B or in other words measurement do not disturb the system.
and if QD =\ 0, some amount of information is destroyed by measurmen

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.