Why do consumers think hard-to-get babes and products are worth the extra effort?

August 10, 2011, University of Chicago

Potential dates who are slightly elusive or products that are stuck on the back of a shelf are more attractive to consumers than their more attainable counterparts, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"To get the best outcomes or products, people usually have to expend effort," write authors Sarah Kim and Aparna A. Labroo (both University of Chicago). "This relationship between effort and value is so closely associated in a consumer's mind that wanting the best outcomes automatically results in increased for any outcome associated with effort, even pointless effort."

In one study, the authors had heterosexual males classify themselves as either "shy gawkers" or "smooth talkers." Participants were presented with a picture of a potential date that was either clear or blurred slightly (by 15 percent). "The shy gawkers behaved as one might expect, evaluating the date more favorably when they viewed the clear rather than the blurry picture," the authors write. "Quite surprisingly, however, the smooth talkers found the date more attractive when the picture was slightly blurry rather than clear."

The authors found similar results with who classified themselves as "smart shoppers." They indicated higher preferences for products when they had to travel across town to get them, even when they were available in a nearby store. They also preferred products that appeared to be pushed back on the shelves.

The authors even found that people who thought of themselves as "pioneers" rather than "" made more to a box when they had to stretch slightly (four feet) to make a contribution.

Luckily, when the researchers directed people's attention to the pointless nature of their efforts, they no longer valued the outcomes associated with the pointless effort. "So the next time you find yourself chasing that hottie, or you find yourself reaching to get a product way back on a shelf, pause for a moment and consider whether the outcome is really worth your effort," the authors conclude.

Explore further: What's a little mold? Why consumers have different freshness standards at home

More information: Sarah Kim and Aparna A. Labroo. "From 'Inherent Value' to 'Incentive Value': When and Why Non-Instrumental Effort Enhances Consumer Preference." Journal of Consumer Research: December 2011 (published online June 21, 2011). ejcr.org

Related Stories

Extended service contracts: When and why do people buy them?

June 15, 2009

Consumer experts have long recommended against buying Extended Service Contracts (ESCs) with products, since they are rarely cost effective. A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research examines the reasons why so many ...

Consumer confidence: When our choices makes the most sense

May 18, 2010

Why do we feel confident about some choices while we question others? According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, it's a combination of how easy the choice seems and whether we're thinking concretely or ...

Recommended for you

A statistical look at the probability of future major wars

February 22, 2018

Aaron Clauset, an assistant professor and computer scientist at the University of Colorado, has taken a calculating look at the likelihood of a major war breaking out in the near future. In an article published on the open ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.