Bogus ratings of mortgage-related securities show conflicts of interest by credit rating agencies

Obvious conflicts of interest and poor performance are among the reasons why a Kansas State University economist says the way the leading credit rating agencies are funded should be changed.

Standard and Poor's incompetent -- and arguably corrupt -- behavior in the years leading up to the 2007-2009 financial crisis makes its recent downgrade of U.S. debt hard for many to swallow, said Lloyd B. Thomas Jr., a K-State professor of economics and the author of a recent book about the financial crisis.

"Standard and Poor's, Fitch and Moody's -- the three leading credit rating agencies -- behaved very poorly during the housing and credit bubbles of 2000-2006," Thomas said. "Many buyers of mortgage-backed bonds can only purchase those rated AAA. The rating agencies routinely stamped mortgage-backed bonds and related derivatives AAA without carefully examining the quality of the individual mortgages that backed them."

Many of these bonds were essentially junk bonds because of the inferior quality of mortgages backing them. Thomas said this failure of the rating process helped feed an enormous expansion in the pipeline of credit to the housing sector, and its inevitable collapse after 2006 is the primary cause of the nation's today.

"These credit rating agencies have been funded by the very investment banks that built the toxic mortgage-backed bonds and related securities," he said, adding that many think that this led to corruption of the ratings process as Standard and Poor's, Moody's and Fitch engaged in a "race to the bottom."

"Standard and Poor's knew that if it failed to rate a mortgage-backed bond AAA, the would take it's business to Fitch or Moody's, which would likely rate the bond AAA in order to collect its million-dollar fee for its rating service from the investment bank," Thomas said. "Clearly this obvious needs to be corrected by implementing a new way of funding the rating agencies."

Thomas is the author of "The and Federal Reserve Policy," which was recently published by Palgrave Macmillan.

Explore further

Standard & Poor's considers downgrading Nokia credit rating

Citation: Bogus ratings of mortgage-related securities show conflicts of interest by credit rating agencies (2011, August 16) retrieved 21 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 16, 2011
This was widely reported during and after the GFC...OUTSIDE the USA. The corruption, the conflicts of interest, issuing loans to people who can't possibly pay them but making them look good by lending those same people the deposit and first year's payment (afterwhich the mortgage must default) and then packaging and selling them overseas was widely reported in Europe and Oceania but I didn't see much about this in the US press...America brought the GFC down on itself due to governmental incompetence and is now paying the price, a fair price if you ask people outside the USA.

Aug 16, 2011
One reason for AAA ratings was the mandate for GOVERNMENT SPONSORED 'enterprises' like Fannie and Freddie to buy mortgages so the finance companies could sell more.

"This report concludes that, in an attempt to increase home ownership, particularly by minorities and the less affluent, virtually every branch of the government undertook an attack on underwriting standards starting in the early 1990s. Regulators, academic specialists, GSEs, and housing activists universally praised the decline in mortgage-underwriting standards as an innovation in mortgage lending. This weakening of underwriting standards succeeded in increasing home ownership and also the price of housing, helping to lead to a housing price bubble. The price bubble, along with relaxed lending standards, allowed speculators to purchase homes without putting their own money at risk. ";id=30

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more