Mythical sea creatures can reveal scientific truth

Sightings of mythical sea monsters can provide important statistical data, according to a leading expert in the field from the University of St. Andrews.

Dr. Charles Paxton, research fellow in the Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling believes studying the anecdotes about creatures, such as the Loch Ness Monster or the Kraken, can reveal information about .

He believes cryptozoology, the study of creatures rumoured to exist, can explain why people believe in what they believe, and how such data can fit in with science.

The statistical expert was speaking at an event on cryptozoology at the Zoological Society of London on July 12 called “Cryptology: Science of Pseudoscience?”

His study of old sightings revealed that, as previously believed, they were not mistaken sightings of objects or creatures in the far distance, but much closer.

Dr. Paxton said: “If you look at the distribution of reported distances of monster accounts, they're much closer than you would expect by chance alone.”

He said the data implies that the theory that people were mistaking things in the far distance for a sea monster was “doubtful”.

He said: “I expected that when I did the analysis, the reports would be far away.

“I thought people were reporting monsters because they'd seen familiar things at a distance.

“But the reported distances are much closer than you'd expect. It's not because these things are a vast distance away, or at least, if witnesses are misinterpreting things, it happens over short distances.”

He gave the example of a group on their way to the Danish colony in Greenland in the 18th century who mistook an aroused whale for a sea creature with a serpent-like tail.

He believes many sightings could be mistaken but did not rule out them being of undiscovered species.

He said: “I would actually say without any doubt at all that there are unknown animals out there. The reason I say without any doubt at all, if you look at the rate at which we're discovering new species, that hasn't completely flattened out.

“Logically, the animals we've not discovered yet are the ones that are difficult to detect, which means it would be very rare for people to encounter them anyway. In terms of marine mammals, for example, I can only think of about 10 people in the world who if they saw a marine mammal would be in a position to say, "That's a marine mammal that we've never described."

However, he said an unknown animal should be the “hypothesis of last resort”.

He said: “We can't explain away all the strange reports, but just because I can't explain a report doesn't mean it's an unknown animal. That's quite a jump.”

Explore further

How a hike led to a math 'Eureka!'

Provided by University of St Andrews
Citation: Mythical sea creatures can reveal scientific truth (2011, July 14) retrieved 16 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 14, 2011
Can the AGW/Cryptoclimate effect be studied as well?

Jul 14, 2011
"Cryptology: Science of Pseudoscience?"

Of course there's probably an awful lot of nonsense out there, but I find it somewhat amusing that this article hits the board the same day as does one titled:
"Borneo rainbow toad seen for 1st time in 87 years"

Jul 14, 2011
Personally, I would not discount "monster" sightings so easily. I have no doubt that there is some validity to sea monster sightings and other legendary sightings. People use the familiar to describe the unfamiliar, and "the familiar" was quite different say even only 100 years ago than it is now. Now we describe the sea monster mentioned as an aroused whale only because we have learned by observation that this is another natural state of the whale. Just think what kind of comments you would get if it were possible to show a modern jet to a human who lived 1,000 years ago.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more