Microsoft riled by charge Bing is a copy cat

Microsoft has angrily denyed that Bing copies Google's search results
A Microsoft's staff member demonstrates maps using Bing at an exhibition in Las Vegas. A spat between Internet titans heated up with Microsoft angrily denying that Bing copies Google's search results and the world's top online search engine adamant it has proof.
A spat between Internet titans heated up with Microsoft angrily denying that Bing copies Google's search results and the world's top online search engine adamant it has proof.

Microsoft senior vice president Yusuf Mehdi went on the offensive in a blog post that accused Google of tricking Bing with a "honeypot attack" too sweet to resist.

"In simple terms, Google's 'experiment' was rigged to manipulate Bing search results through a type of attack also known as 'click fraud,'" Mehdi said.

"That's right, the same type of attack employed by on the Web to trick consumers and produce bogus search results."

Google held firm that it conducted a simple, honest experiment that showed Bing copied its search results and that rather than gripe about getting caught it should simply stop doing it.

"Some Bing results increasingly look like an incomplete, stale version of Google results -- a cheap imitation," said Amit Singhal, one of the company's search engineers, on Google's official blog.

Google had noted that in the summer of 2010 Bing did not return any results for a misspelled search for the surgical eye procedure "tarsorrhaphy."

"Later in the summer, Bing started returning our first result to their users without offering the spell correction," Singhal said. "This was very strange."

The experiment was repeated with nonsensical searches, including "hiybbprqag," "delhipublicschool40 chdjob," and "juegosdeben1ogrande," which Google had designed to link to a single unrelated result.

Google engineers used their company's and Microsoft's Internet Explorer web browsing software to search on the fabricated terms that generated orchestrated results.

Within weeks, Bing offered the same results for searches on the made-up terms, according to Singhal.

Google equated the experiment to releasing intentionally false information and following its trail.

"We do not copy results from any of our competitors," Mehdi said. "Period.

"We have some of the best minds in the world at work on search quality and relevance, and for a competitor to accuse any one of these people of such activity is just insulting," he continued.

argued that search feedback from users of is "one of more than 1,000 signals" taken into account by its formula to match online queries with results.

Bing gets information from users who agree to share anonymous data "as they navigate the web in order to help us improve the experience for all users."

Google found it suspicious that a fictional search term and fabricated results popped into Bing if they were just one signal in a sea of more than 1,000 signals considered by Microsoft's ranking software.

"However you define copying, the bottom line is, these Bing results came directly from ," Singhal said in a blog post detailing the sting operation.

"To those who have asked what we want out of all this, the answer is simple: we'd like for this practice to stop."

Bing corporate vice president Harry Shum dismissed Google's experiment as "a spy-novelesque stunt."

"It doesn't accurately portray how we use opt-in customer data as one of many inputs to help improve our user experience," Shum said.

"We all learn from our collective customers, and we all should," Shum said.

Explore further

Google accuses Microsoft's Bing of 'cheating, copying' search results

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: Microsoft riled by charge Bing is a copy cat (2011, February 3) retrieved 19 April 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 03, 2011
Microsoft has built their company by using technology of other companies. Why should anyone expect its search engine to be different?

Feb 03, 2011
Obviously they would try to copy the #1 search engine's results. Is there any law stopping them? Google is available to everyone. I'm not saying it is morally correct, but I don't see what Google can do about it.

Even Google does a similar thing to Wikipedia (e.g., search for any term and notice that the Wiki article is one of the top 3 results; often the first). I don't know how they do this, but clearly they use Wikipedia articles or search results to bolster their own.

Feb 03, 2011
Bing is quiet possibly the worst search engine to date...the robots almost never ignore robots.txt or similar client side disallows...that's just the first gripe I have to pick with these phonies...

Just to click a simple link it steals all of your previous search results and imports tons of excess information that would *NEVER* be needed just to "increase accurate results" bottom line they sell it to marketers.
Let's not forget half the time you load bing you are swamped with autoplay adverts with loud noises. Or random empty flashing boxes that move around the screen. (they've cleaned up as of late 2010 but not good enough) The pages are confusing. The java makes the page go unresponsive 10% of every click. The videos need proprietary unnecessary plugins to mine more data. Random saves extra files to desktops etc. It randomly enables linking to facebook and mines yet more data. It's literally an exact copy of google now. Literally. Even looks the same.

Feb 03, 2011
hah!, caught with their grubby paws in the cookie jar :D

Feb 03, 2011
I don't know about anyone else, but i often search both engines and most of time the searches come up with different results. Am i missing something?? Personally i prefer bing, google is starting to gather to much information about the users of the world. I don't trust it

Feb 03, 2011
Old tricks made new again.
"Besides the obvious possibility of simple playful mischief, fictitious entries may be composed for other purposes. Chief among these is to catch copyright infringers."

Does Googlemaps include "Trap streets"
A trap street is a fictitious entry in the form of a misrepresented street on a map, often outside the area the map nominally covers, for the purpose of "trapping" potential copyright violators of the map[1]

Now if Google can get MSoft to return
"Mxyzptlk" backwards will they disappear to the 5th dimension?


Feb 04, 2011
Why can't we all just get along?

Bing has not been a big hit and that's due to a late debut. Google shouldn't worry...Bing execs paid for this stunt?

Feb 07, 2011
MicroCrap stole from Digital Research back in the 1980's so they could get their 'copy' code working! Imagine DR Dos code in MSDOS.

Bill did have better marketing skills than Gary (DR) but Gary sure knew his work. Too bad it couldn't have been the other way when IBM stopped by Monterey and Gary was flying his plane so IBM left on their afternoon flight to see Bill...history now...but that's the way it was.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more