Patent infringement verdict restored against Microsoft

A US court has found against Microsoft in a patent appeals case but has not reaffirmed a 388-million-dollar jury award
A US appeals court has restored a verdict that found computer software giant Microsoft had infringed on a patent for an anti-piracy technology owned by a competitor, Uniloc USA.

A US appeals court restored a verdict that found Microsoft infringed on a patent for an anti-piracy technology owned by a competitor, Uniloc USA. But the court did not reaffirm a 388-million-dollar jury award.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overruled the decision of a lower court judge who threw out a jury's guilty verdict against Microsoft in September.

At the same time, it found that the method the jury used to calculate Uniloc's damages, known as the "25 percent rule," was "fundamentally flawed."

Jury's often estimate a plaintiff's losses as being 25 percent of the expected profits of the product containing the .

But in its 59-page opinion, the appeals court ruled that was insufficient to establish a reasonable for the technology's use.

The court said a new trial would be required to establish damages and interest due Uniloc.

Uniloc, which makes , called the ruling a "significant victory" in its eight-year-old suit against Microsoft over an anti-piracy system used in its Windows XP and Office XP products.

"We are very pleased with the ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," Uniloc CEO Brad Davis said.

"This decision illustrates how large corporations, like Microsoft, have knowingly infringed on our technology for financial gain. We are proud of the work that we have accomplished since our founding and will continue to vigorously defend our existing and future innovations."

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: Patent infringement verdict restored against Microsoft (2011, January 5) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2011-01-patent-infringement-verdict-microsoft.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

RI judge tosses patent verdict against Microsoft

0 shares

Feedback to editors