Neutron stars may be too weak to power some gamma-ray bursts

November 3, 2010, University of California - Berkeley
This is an illustration of the collapse of a massive star in which the large envelope forms a rotationally supported disk and may even lead to a relativistic jet. This "collapsar" picture may explain at least one class of gamma-ray bursts, cosmic explosions that are a million trillion times as bright as the sun! Gamma-ray bursts last for anywhere from a few milliseconds to several minutes, and for that time they are the brightest source of gamma-rays in the entire observable Universe. The energy from one event is enough to supply the entire world's electrical energy needs for approximately a hundred million billion billion years. Credit: Tony Piro/Caltech

A gamma-ray burst is an immensely powerful blast of high-energy light thought to be generated by a collapsing star in a distant galaxy, but what this collapse leaves behind has been a matter of debate.

A new analysis of four extremely bright bursts observed by NASA's Fermi satellite suggests that the remnant from a long-duration gamma-ray burst is most likely a black hole – not a rapidly spinning, highly magnetized neutron star, or magnetar since such a burst emits more energy than is theoretically possible from a magnetar.

"Some of the events we have been finding seem to be pushing right up against this total limit for a neutron star progenitor system," said S. Bradley Cenko, a post-doctoral fellow from the University of California, Berkeley.

Cenko will present these findings on Wednesday, Nov. 3, at the Nov. 1-4 Gamma Ray Bursts 2010 conference in Annapolis, Md. Cenko is a member of an international team that includes astronomers from UC Berkeley and the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) in New Mexico.

The group has submitted a paper detailing its analysis to The Astrophysical Journal.

Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are presumed to be created by the explosive collapse in distant galaxies of massive stars. The explosion is visible from Earth because the light is emitted in a narrow cone, like a beam from a lighthouse. First discovered in 1967 by satellites looking for nuclear blasts on Earth, gamma-ray bursts have been the focus of several satellite missions, most recently NASA's Fermi gamma-ray space telescope, launched in 2008, and NASA's Swift satellite, launched in 2004.

With accumulating observations, astronomers have been able to create models of how the collapse of a rapidly rotating, massive star can accelerate matter to nearly the speed of light and collimate it into two oppositely directed, tightly focused beams along the spin axis. They have also studied how these particles generate gamma rays and other emissions.

The two leading candidates for powering these long-duration bursts are a magnetar and a black hole, sometimes referred to as a collapsar. In both cases, material from the star falls inward and is catapulted out by the spinning neutron star or black hole. What distinguishes these models is that magnetar-powered bursts cannot be as powerful as black hole-powered bursts.

"The question we have been trying to answer is: What is the true energy release from these events?" Cenko said. "We can measure all the light emitted – very high energy gamma rays, and, at later times, X-ray, optical and radio afterglow emissions – but that doesn't provide a very good estimate, because GRBs emit in relatively narrow jets. We have to get an idea of the geometry of this outflow, that is, how collimated the jets are."

Previous studies have shown that light measured in the afterglow begins to drop steeply at a certain point, and the sooner this drop-off, called a jet break, the narrower the jet. Typically, the gamma-ray burst itself lasts from a few seconds to as long as 100 seconds, but the afterglow, produced when the jets interact with gas and dust surrounding the star, emits visible light for a couple of weeks and radio radiation for several months.

While Swift has observed hundreds of bursts in the past five years and notified astronomers within seconds of detection, the instruments aboard the satellite detect mostly medium-sized bursts that are not as highly collimated and that have a jet break many days or weeks after the burst.

Fermi's Large Area Telescope, however, is sensitive to very bright bursts with jet breaks within several days of the burst, making follow-up observations easier with Swift's X-ray and ultraviolet-optical telescopes and the ground-based Very Large Array, a radio telescope operated by NRAO.

Fermi detects few extremely bright bursts, however – only four in 2009, Cenko said – and does not notify astronomers for nearly a day afterward. Once alerted, however, Cenko's team was able to observe the optical, X-ray and radio afterglow of these four events, find the jet break and use this information, along with the star's distance calculated from its redshift, to estimate the total energy output.

If the energy from these bright bursts were emitted in all directions, it would be equivalent to the mass of the sun being converted instantaneously into pure energy. Because the gamma-ray burst was focused in a cone only a few degrees wide, however, the energies for all four bursts were about 100𔂿,000 times less than this.

Theoretical models of how these beams are produced place a limit on how much energy a magnetar can generate in one of these explosive bursts: about 100 times less than if one converted the sun entirely into energy. Several of these bright bursts exceed this limit.

"The magnetar model is in serious trouble for such incredibly powerful events," noted coauthor Alex Filippenko, UC Berkeley professor of astronomy. "Even if the magnetar energy limit is not strictly violated, the tremendous efficiency required by this process strains credulity."

"In the future, we will be trying to make more precise measurements and be looking for more events to rule out a neutron star model," Cenko said.

Explore further: The Cosmic Shredder and the Magnetar

Related Stories

The Cosmic Shredder and the Magnetar

December 15, 2005

No, it is not the title of the next Harry Potter book - but the latest discoveries from NASA's Swift mission which is studying gamma-ray bursts (GRB's) - the most powerful explosions occurring in the Universe. As reported ...

Swift Observes An Unusual Bang In The Far Universe

April 6, 2006

Almost 40 years have passed since top secret nuclear weapon warning satellites accidentally discovered bursts of high energy gamma rays coming from space. Although many thousands of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) have since been ...

Tracking the Riddle of Cosmic Gamma Rays

August 23, 2005

First simultaneous observation of a gamma-ray burst in the X-ray and in the very high energy gamma ray band. For the first time a gamma-ray burst (GRB) has been observed simultaneously in the X-ray and in the very high energy ...

The Case of the Missing Gamma-ray Bursts

October 23, 2008

Gamma-ray bursts are by far the brightest and most powerful explosions in the Universe, second only to the Big Bang itself. So it might seem a bit surprising that a group of them has gone missing.

The Oddball Hosts of Gamma-ray Bursts

October 22, 2008

There's a universal tendency to heed Dylan Thomas's exhortation and go out with a bang instead of a whimper. Nowhere is this more evident than deep in the cosmos.

New Type of Cosmic Explosion More Powerful Than Supernovae

August 5, 2004

Astronomers have identified a new class of cosmic explosions that are more powerful than supernovae but considerably weaker than most gamma-ray bursts. The discovery strongly suggests a continuum between the two previously-known ...

Recommended for you

Three 'super-Earths' orbiting a cool dwarf star discovered

January 23, 2018

Using NASA's prolonged Kepler mission, known as K2, astronomers have found three new "super-Earth" exoplanets. The newly detected alien worlds orbit the cool dwarf star designated LP415-17. The finding is reported January ...

Scientist proposes new definition of a planet

January 23, 2018

Pluto hogs the spotlight in the continuing scientific debate over what is and what is not a planet, but a less conspicuous argument rages on about the planetary status of massive objects outside our solar system. The dispute ...

Dust storms linked to gas escape from Martian atmosphere

January 23, 2018

Some Mars experts are eager and optimistic for a dust storm this year to grow so grand it darkens skies around the entire Red Planet. This type of phenomenon in the environment of modern Mars could be examined as never before ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Nov 03, 2010
Some GRB's bear the energy, corresponding the whole mass of Sun in relativistic sense - so it's evident, such bursts cannot originate from stars, where the upper limit of mass is limited to some three solar masses.
2.5 / 5 (2) Nov 03, 2010
Some GRB's bear the energy, corresponding the whole mass of Sun in relativistic sense - so it's evident, such bursts cannot originate from stars, where the upper limit of mass is limited to some three solar masses.

Umm, I think you meant to say that the mass of neutron stars is limited to about 3 solar masses. Known stars go up to 160x the mass of the sun or so.

The problem in sorting all this out, though, is that if a large star explodes in a supernova, a lot of energy (and mass) can go into the GRB. But the math problem is obvious. Take the energy released, divde by the efficiency of the process and you get the minimum assumed mass of the original star just before the supernova. Even at a 1% to 2% total conversion efficiency, the limit on initial stellar mass is more restrictive than that on the size of the resulting neutron star.

My guess is that you drop a star (relatively) straight into an intermediate (or larger) mass black hole to get a GRB.
1 / 5 (3) Nov 04, 2010
A neutron is unlightspeeding Neptune, thank you Pi.
2 / 5 (4) Nov 05, 2010
Unless the experimental evidence for neutron repulsion is taken into account ["Nuclear systematics: III. The source of solar luminosity", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 252, 3-7 (2002); "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source", J. Fusion Energy 20, 197-201 (2003)], neutron stars will continue to be an enigma

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
not rated yet Nov 26, 2010
I don't see what's scientifically new in this article. We already know how big is the energy of a GRB. We already know that neutron stars do not possess the energy needed for a lGRB. Just as we know, that a black hole cannot explain the variability of the lGRB. So, nothing new here. Only a very good publicity for Berkley, of course.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.