Was Venus once a habitable planet?

Was Venus once a habitable planet?
This artist’s concept of Venus, dated 2006, suggests the presence of lightning in the atmosphere. Credits: J. Whatmore

(PhysOrg.com) -- ESA's Venus Express is helping planetary scientists investigate whether Venus once had oceans. If it did, it may even have begun its existence as a habitable planet similar to Earth.

These days, Earth and Venus seem completely different. Earth is a lush, clement world teeming with life, whilst Venus is hellish, its surface roasting at temperatures higher than those of a kitchen oven.

But underneath it all the two share a number of striking similarities. They are nearly identical in size and now, thanks to ’s Venus Express orbiter, planetary scientists are seeing other similarities too.

“The basic composition of Venus and Earth is very similar,” says Hľkan Svedhem, ESA Venus Express Project Scientist. Just how similar planetary scientists from around the world will be discussing in Aussois, France, where they are gathering this week for a conference.

One difference stands out: Venus has very little water. Were the contents of Earth’s oceans to be spread evenly across the world, they would create a layer 3 km deep. If you were to condense the amount of water vapour in Venus’ atmosphere onto its surface, it would create a global puddle just 3 cm deep.

Yet there is another similarity here. Billions of years ago, Venus probably had much more water. Venus Express has certainly confirmed that the planet has lost a large quantity of water into space.

It happens because ultraviolet radiation from the Sun streams into Venus’ atmosphere and breaks up the water molecules into atoms: two hydrogens and one oxygen. These then escape to space.

Venus Express has measured the rate of this escape and confirmed that roughly twice as much hydrogen is escaping as oxygen. It is therefore believed that water is the source of these escaping ions. It has also shown that a heavy form of hydrogen, called deuterium, is progressively enriched in the upper echelons of Venus’s atmosphere, because the heavier hydrogen will find it less easy to escape the planet’s grip.

“Everything points to there being large amounts of water on Venus in the past,” says Colin Wilson, Oxford University, UK. But that does not necessarily mean there were oceans on the planet’s surface.

Was Venus once a habitable planet?
Venus Monitoring Camera image taken in the ultraviolet (0.365 micrometres), from a distance of about 30 000 km. It shows numerous high-contrast features, caused by an unknown chemical in the clouds that absorbs ultraviolet light, creating the bright and dark zones. With data from Venus Express, scientists have learnt that the equatorial areas on Venus that appear dark in ultraviolet light are regions of relatively high temperature, where intense convection brings up dark material from below. In contrast, the bright regions at mid-latitudes are areas where the temperature in the atmosphere decreases with depth. The temperature reaches a minimum at the cloud tops suppressing vertical mixing. This annulus of cold air, nicknamed the ‘cold collar’, appears as a bright band in the ultraviolet images. Credits: ESA/MPS/DLR/IDA

Eric Chassefičre, Université Paris-Sud, France, has developed a computer model that suggests the water was largely atmospheric and existed only during the very earliest times, when the surface of the planet was completely molten. As the water molecules were broken into atoms by sunlight and escaped into space, the subsequent drop in temperature probably triggered the solidification of the surface. In other words: no oceans.

Although it is difficult to test this hypothesis it is a key question. If Venus ever did possess surface water, the planet may possibly have had an early habitable phase.

Even if true, Chassefičre’s model does not preclude the chance that colliding comets brought additional water to Venus after the surface crystallised, and these created bodies of standing in which life may have been able to form.

There are many open questions. “Much more extensive modelling of the magma ocean-atmosphere system and of its evolution is required to better understand the evolution of the young Venus,” says Chassefičre.

When creating those computer models, the data provided by Express will prove crucial.

Explore further

Europe's Venus Express is ready for launch

Citation: Was Venus once a habitable planet? (2010, June 24) retrieved 26 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-06-venus-habitable-planet.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 24, 2010
I wonder if lack of an intrinsic magnetic field has anything to do with its current conditions (as may be the case with Mars)?


Did you mean "[+1]leptoweak realistic Downboson (=bleu)minus relative 1 Nuclearhyperon, to be read downunder my blog"? It makes much more sense!

Jun 25, 2010
In 2008 ESA's Venus Express did find evidence for stripping of elements from Venus' atmosphere related to the planets lack of a magnetic field.

"Unlike Earth, Venus does not generate a magnetic field. This is significant because Earth’s magnetic field protects its atmosphere from the solar wind. At Venus, however, the solar wind strikes the upper atmosphere and carries off particles into space. Planetary scientists think that the planet has lost part of its water in this way over the four-and-a-half-thousand million years since the planet’s birth." ( http://www.esa.in...F_0.html )

This confirmed a similar result of a 2007 ESA study of Venus: http://www.esa.in...F_0.html

Jun 26, 2010

It is a mystery, isn't it?
It is more than a little strange that Venus lacks a magnetic field, having formed in what one would presume to have been a part of the disc more or less identical to Earth.
Add to that the fact that Venus' surface exhibits very little by way of cratering, and therefore, most likely, is tectonically/geologically active enough to be continuously creating new crust, and it makes the mystery that much more mysterious.
If not radioisotopes, then what is producing the heat to drive vulcanism/tectonics?

Jun 28, 2010
@yyz & Caliban:

Your points and questions are excellent.

It's suggested, due to a lack of plate tectonics, Venus' mantle is too hot to allow the dynamo effect to develop.

See: "Magnetic field and core" http://en.wikiped...and_core

And it's suggested that plate tectonics are largely driven by the presence of our Earth's moon.

See: "Tidal forces" http://en.wikiped...l_forces

Interestingly, Venus has two high plateaus (or "continents"), suggesting the possibility of early oceans and an earth-like water cycle.

Thus it seems apparent that for earth-like worlds to survive, a large tidal moon is required.

I wonder how common such binary planetary systems are in other star systems?

Jun 28, 2010
"I wonder how common such binary planetary systems are in other star systems?"

We may have meaningful statistics on such systems in just a few years (fingers crossed!).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more