Researchers Use Wind Tunnels to Test New World Cup Ball

June 8, 2010 By Devin Powell, Inside Science News Service

Every four years, a new official soccer ball is designed for and used during World Cup matches. And every four years, players criticize the new ball.

"It's a little sad that the has ball of such poor quality," Iker Casillas of Spain, one of the top keepers in the world, told Spanish reporters after being scored upon in a match. Other players have called its flight weird and unpredictable.

But this time around, the athletes have science on their side.

Researchers in Japan were the first to independently test the ball's flight characteristics in wind tunnels, finding evidence that the new ball does in fact fly more erratically than the 2006 "Teamgeist" ball. Their data suggests it may not always provide the "exceptionally stable flight" that Adidas claims.

Some Balls Like It Rough

The new "Jabulani" ball -- released by Adidas last December in South Africa and in regular use since the beginning of the 2010 Major League Soccer season in March -- is not a traditional black-and-white ball of 32 flat pentagon and octagon panels stitched together.

The Jabulani is made of eight spherically-molded panels bonded together without stitches. Tested in , wind tunnels, and on the pitch by Adidas personnel at a facility in Germany and by researchers at the University of Loughborough in the United Kingdom, the ball is, according to Adidas, "perfectly round" to within less than one hundredth of an inch.

English player Frank Lampard, who is sponsored by Adidas, described it as "a very strong ball, true to hit."

But some other sports engineers who have taken a look at the ball are inclined to agree with the goalkeepers. Its surface, they said, seems suspiciously smooth -- despite grooves added by the designers that encircle the ball.

"It seems like the aerodynamic characteristics of Jabulani come near that of a smooth sphere," said Takeshi Asai, a sports engineer who tested the new ball at the University of Tsukuba in Japan.

It sounds counterintuitive, but rougher balls tend to be more stable when flying through the air.

"If you had a golf ball without dimples, you couldn't drive it 100 yards," said John Eric Goff of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. "If a baseball didn't have stitches, you'd never hit a home run."

That's because roughness on a surface creates turbulence around a ball moving at high speeds -- eddies of air that cling to and stabilize it. When a ball slows down to a critical speed, the airflow becomes smooth or "laminar" as the streamlines become parallel. This switch from turbulent to laminar flow, which roughness helps to counteract, causes the ball to change velocity; it's a nightmare for goalies and helps kickers bend one into the back of the net.

Decades of research have shown that the smallest variations in the surface can have a big effect. In 2008, Goff found that sharper faces on a traditional soccer ball help to trip the air flow to turbulent at lower speeds. Even the width of grooves on the surface of the ball has been shown to change the airflow.

Smooth Moves

The design of the ball may actually help it to fly farther at fast speeds, according to tests conducted by Kazuya Seo of Yamagata University in Japan, whose research was supported by the sports equipment manufacturer Molten USA. When kicked at 45-70 mph -- typical speeds achieved by professional players -- the ball feels less drag than previous balls and actually flies a few meters father.

But his tests also showed that as the ball slows, its behavior becomes more like that of a smooth sphere than previous World Cup balls. At just under 45 mph, turbulent flow becomes laminar and the ball suddenly feels heavy drag forces that put on the brakes.

"The fullback who wants to head the ball will have to wait more," said Seo. "The player who is familiar with the [2006] Geist might lose his/her timing."

Asai found another potential issue with the Jabulani in the wind tunnels: its spin.

Spinning balls -- like a curveball in baseball -- experience a sideward force noticed 300 years ago by Isaac Newton, who said that one side of tennis ball seems to "beat the contiguous air more vigorously than the other." This is now called the Magnus effect, and it happens because a spinning ball generates a pressure on one side is greater than on the other.

According to Asai's measurement, this sideways force on the Jabulani fluctuates more than the forces on the 2006 World Cup ball, which could cause it to bend in unpredictable ways and help to explain the reactions from goalkeepers.

Considering all of the other variables involved in the World Cup -- from pitches at high altitudes to inconsistent player performances -- it's unclear whether these differences in the ball in this are extreme enough to affect the final scores.

In the end, said Tim Chartier, a mathematician at Davidson College near Charlotte, N.C., putting out a new ball is a bit like Microsoft testing a new version of Windows in the field after months of laboratory debugging.

"World Cup soccer players will kick the again and again and again," said Cartier. "They'll find the unseen bugs."

Explore further: Will the new World Cup soccer ball bend? Physics plays a role in on-ground action

Related Stories

Recommended for you

X-rays reveal chirality in swirling electric vortices

January 16, 2018

Scientists used spiraling X-rays at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) to observe, for the first time, a property that gives handedness to swirling electric patterns – dubbed ...

Quan­tum physics turned into tan­gi­ble re­al­ity

January 16, 2018

ETH physicists have developed a silicon wafer that behaves like a topological insulator when stimulated using ultrasound. They have thereby succeeded in turning an abstract theoretical concept into a macroscopic product.

Slow 'hot electrons' could improve solar cell efficiency

January 16, 2018

Photons with energy higher than the band gap of the semiconductor absorbing them give rise to what are known as hot electrons. The extra energy in respect to the band gap is lost very fast, as it is converted into heat and ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (5) Jun 09, 2010
It does not matter what kind of ball they use. The players will continue to precisely kick the ball into the opposition's hands (feet--sorry), ad nauseum.

Yeay futbol!!!
3 / 5 (2) Jun 09, 2010
Why, oh why do they keep dicking around with the design? It takes footballers years to learn the precise dynamics of the ball, if you then substitute it you make them all look like amateurs. This is exactly what happened in the last world cup - the inch-perfect passes were all "overhit" by a metre or two, making it look like Women's soccer - lots of goal kicks and throw-ins.
3 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2010
IMO it's all matter of habit - whenever you become trained with some ball, you cannot switch to a new one so easily.
1.5 / 5 (4) Jun 09, 2010
The difference between the new ball and previous versions is that the new ball is cheaper to manufacture. The effect is that its performance is somewhat compromised but not enough for anyone to really care, since conditions are the same for all players. Regardless of what Adidas says, I doubt that they use real science in determining the design for the perfect soccer ball. The bottom line is more important. Maybe they've decided that the perfect ball doesn't exist.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 15, 2010
To me it sounds like they could use more rough surface to get the ball to behave more predictably. That should not affect the way it's put together.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.