Intruder alert: 'Smart Dew' will find you!

March 26, 2009,
A Tel Aviv University researcher's fingertip (bottom right) points to a "Smart Dew" droplet. Credit: AFTAU

A remarkable new invention from Tel Aviv University — a network of tiny sensors as small as dewdrops called "Smart Dew" — will foil even the most determined intruder. Scattered outdoors on rocks, fence posts and doorways, or indoors on the floor of a bank, the dewdrops are a completely new and cost-effective system for safeguarding and securing wide swathes of property.

Prof. Yoram Shapira and his Tel Aviv University Faculty of Engineering team drew upon the space-age science of motes to develop the new security tool. Dozens, hundreds and even thousands of these sensors - each equipped with a controller and /receiver - can also be wirelessly networked to detect the difference between man, animal, car and truck.

"We've created a that has no scale limitations," says Prof. Shapira. This makes it especially useful for large farms or even the borders of nations where it's difficult, and sometimes impractical, to install fences or constantly patrol them.

"Most people could never afford the manpower to guard such large properties," explains Prof. Shapira. "Instead, we've created this Smart Dew to do the work. It's invisible to an intruder, and can provide an alarm that someone has entered the premises."

"The Cheapest and Smartest Solution on the Market"

Each individual "dew droplet" can detect an intrusion within a parameter of 50 meters (about 165 feet). And at a cost of 25 cents per "droplet," Prof. Shapira says that his solution is the cheapest and the smartest on the market.

A part of the appeal of Smart Dew is its near-invisibility, Prof. Shapira says. "Smart Dew is a covert monitoring system. Because the sensors in the Smart Dew wireless network are so small, you would need bionic vision to notice them. There would be so many tiny droplets over the monitored area that it would be impossible to find each and every one."

Electronic Ears, Noses, Skin and Eyes

Unlike conventional alarm systems, each droplet of Smart Dew can be programmed to monitor a different condition. Sounds could be picked up by a miniature microphone. The metal used in the construction of cars and tractors could be detected by a magnetic sensor. Smart Dew droplets could also be programmed to detect temperature changes, carbon monoxide emissions, vibrations or light.

Each droplet sends a radio signal to a "base station" that collects and analyzes the data. Like the signals sent out by cordless phones, RF is a safe, low-power solution, making Prof. Shapira's technology extremely cost-effective compared to other concepts.

"It doesn't require much imagination to envision the possibilities for this technology to be used," says Prof. Shapira. "They are really endless."

Source: Tel Aviv University (news : web)

Explore further: Seeing through the skin

Related Stories

Seeing through the skin

September 11, 2008

Feeling blue? According to Prof. Leonid Yaroslavsky from Tel Aviv University, the saying may be more than just a metaphor.

Smart Suit Doesn't Miss a Beat

July 3, 2007

Imagine wearing a smart T-shirt or a suit embedded with tiny electronics that can monitor your heart or respiratory function wirelessly. When dirty, you take it off and throw it in the wash or have it dry-cleaned.

A simple blood test for colon cancer

November 20, 2008

People are often reluctant to undergo a routine but painful colonoscopy -- but the consequences can be fatal. According to the American Cancer Society, colon cancer is the third most common cancer found in American men ...

Researchers root out new and efficient crop plants

July 30, 2008

A part of the global food crisis is the inefficiency of current irrigation methods. More irrigated water evaporates than reaches the roots of crops, amounting to an enormous waste of water and energy.

Anti-cancer flower power

August 25, 2008

Could a substance from the jasmine flower hold the key to an effective new therapy to treat cancer? Prof. Eliezer Flescher of The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University thinks so. He and his colleagues have developed ...

Recommended for you

Privacy becomes a selling point at tech show

January 7, 2019

Apple is not among the exhibitors at the 2019 Consumer Electronics Show, but that didn't prevent the iPhone maker from sending a message to attendees on a large billboard.

China's Huawei unveils chip for global big data market

January 7, 2019

Huawei Technologies Ltd. showed off a new processor chip for data centers and cloud computing Monday, expanding into new and growing markets despite Western warnings the company might be a security risk.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) Mar 26, 2009
Ubiquitous surveillance will be used to remove every last freedom we have. When these things shrink down to microscopic size they will be everywhere in the environment, secretly reporting our every movement, whether we are carrying metal, etc. Ubiquitous simple surveillance that will lead to the ultimate police state. A version of 1984 that not even Orwell could have had a nightmare of.
4 / 5 (1) Mar 26, 2009
looks like a microphone and a smt chip glued on to a hearing aid battery. really doubt that is a photo of a working prototype.
4 / 5 (1) Mar 26, 2009
It's all up to who uses it. This kind of technological advancement is inevitable.

Like with everything else it will either make us or break us.
not rated yet Mar 26, 2009
RF Power Supply? Didn't Tesla try that?
5 / 5 (2) Mar 26, 2009
RF Power Supply? Didn't Tesla try that?

There are many wireless power systems out there now. They are generally just not considered practical since it is inefficient. With something that would require as little power as these, that does not matter though.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 26, 2009
OK let's deploy them on the Afghan/Pakistan border.
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 26, 2009
These can be located with an RF receiver and blocked by RF noise.
5 / 5 (1) Mar 26, 2009
The 1984 scenario never happened, because in order to watch everyone, you'd need just as many intelligent watchers as those being watched. Without intelligent watchers to filter the data, you end up with vast quantities of data that is essentially just garbage. Improvements in artificial intelligence will "help" sift through all of this junk, but why bother? No one really cares what we all do every second of our's boring! And by the time an AI watcher is smart enough to accurately gauge our intentions, it will already be equivalent to a human being, and be too preoccupied with its own existence to care about watching humans.
4 / 5 (1) Mar 26, 2009
I guess the inventors forgot about lawnmowers.

Or birds. Or rain.

Also, please rename product, thanks.
3.4 / 5 (5) Mar 27, 2009
Smart dew or Dumb Stew... I'm not convinced that this technology is more pragmatic than theoretical at present - e.g. implied ambiguity exists as one can read that it's capable of magnetic detection over 50m, what are they using, SQUIDs with magnetic beam focusing or you have to drive directly over them? Then they have sufficient power to report to a base station - over what distance, 30m or so with that antenna size? You need a few tens of thousand base stations over an area of say, 100 km sqr? And with tens of thousands of these lying around some geography, how long does their power source last usefully before you have to go around with a microscope and pop open the backs to replace the batteries, or are they just passively RF-powered? Then, if so, how do they generate sufficient RF power output over any useful distance? And then, without conspicuous structural sensor addition, other specialised electronic processing or modifications they can also do chemical, aerosol, suspended particulate, gas, acoustic and seismic detection and analysis? I don't doubt future feasability of multi-sensor, long-range networked intrusion monitoring, have worked on that myself, but this sounds a little sci-fi. How about a goose on a long bit of string instead: Smart Cackle?
2.5 / 5 (2) Mar 27, 2009
My theory is that this an April Fool's joke, released prematurely by mistake. The device's name and Israeli origin are the tell-tale clues.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 29, 2009
Brings to mind something called Smart Water,which should revolutionize forensics,although it wouldn't be any use for intruder detection:
1 / 5 (1) Mar 29, 2009
2 / 5 (1) Mar 29, 2009
RF Power Supply? Didn't Tesla try that?

The article doesn't say anything about using an RF power supply...
3 / 5 (1) Mar 30, 2009
Fazer, computers already do a large part of this for our intelligence services. Are they perfect no but they hit on key words flagging them for further examination. So you go from millions of hours of conversation to thousands. At the rate computing power is increasing do the same thing again with a tighter rule set on your smaller sample and reduce it to an even smaller sample. Take for example in the US, in Missouri where they recently instructed the Highway Patrol to regard anyone with a libertarian bumper sticker as a potential domestic terrorist. Combine something like a filter on conversations from any cell phone from say registered democrat/republican. Have you ever considered how much information you are requested to provide for informational purposes to provide lists to cross reference. When the net gets fine enough the requirements for tracking go way down.

Human talking in grid no longer needs to be looked up to be identified because he was tracked as he left Citizen 1960 As a Latino, Democrat, Vegetarian, Watcher of TVshow 24 has 4 filters applied to all conversations, probably has less than an hour a month of conversations that need to be monitored. Now if you say you never look at those conversations unless he has more than say 5 hits in a day or 40 in a month then you review them under the assumption that most conspiracies or deliberate patterns of violations will take multiple occurrences you radically reduce the expenditure of time. Then you only have 5-6 billion moving data points. Once it is in place terror will reinforce the system as most of the sheeple will cower down hoping that they won't be next. Look at Stalin he killed millions, so many in fact they dont' even have a good count imagine what he would have done with this assuming he didnt' just chip everyone.
1 / 5 (1) Apr 27, 2009
How about we just follow the constitution and stop letting the federal government doing 90% of what it's doing now.

Freedom is never a bad idea.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.