Mars mysteries could be answered through airplanes

Oct 08, 2010 By Prachi Patel, Astrobio.net
Artist’s concept of the ARES airplane flying over the surface of Mars. Credit: Langley Research Center

There are regions on Mars where the ground is much too rugged for a rover to explore. Instead, a robotic, rocket-powered airplane could be the ideal way to investigate some of these intriguing but as-yet inaccessible areas.

Various orbiters, landers and rovers that have explored in the past three decades have revealed tantalizing evidence of the conditions for life, from at the planet’s North Pole to methane plumes in the atmosphere. For atmospheric scientist Joel Levine, the evidence has made the case for flying an over Mars stronger than ever.

Levine champions the ARES Mars airplane mission at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, VA. He believes that a robotic, rocket-powered airplane is the perfect platform for unraveling the red planet’s biggest mysteries. Soaring at an altitude of 1.6 kilometers, an airplane could cover hundreds of kilometers, gathering visual images and remote sensing data that it transmits back to Earth.

“A powered airplane flying a mile above the surface can obtain measurements over inaccessible parts of Mars and collect a whole bunch of data that no can collect,” Levine says. As opposed to orbiters, meanwhile, the airplane would be close enough to the ground to get high-resolution images and chemical sensing data.

ARES, which stands for Aerial Regional-Scale Environmental Surveyor, is Levine’s brainchild. He has now formed a team of 250 people, from airplane designers to mission planners to bring his vision of a robotic airplane soaring above Mars to fruition. The team has built and tested a prototype ARES airplane and they are gearing for the next NASA Mars mission solicitation.

The ARES airplane prototype is 5 meters long, with a wingspan of about 6.5 meters, and is made of a lightweight polymer-carbon composite material. It would be packed with its tail and wings folded into an aeroshell similar to the one that brought the rovers to Mars.

About 12 hours away from the surface, the carrier spacecraft would release the aeroshell, which would descend to the surface aided by a parachute. Thirty-two kilometers above the surface, the airplane would be ejected, its wings and tail would unfold and the rocket engines would ignite.

Schematic showing the locations of various instruments inside the ARES airplane. Credit: Langley Research Center

Levine is most interested in flying ARES over the mountains, craters and volcanoes in the southern highlands, where it hasn’t been possible to land safely until now.

“There are some very interesting things in the southern hemisphere,” Levine says. “There are regions of very high crustal magnetism, whose origin no one understands. By studying crustal magnetism, we can learn whether it will shield the surface of Mars from high-energy solar wind particles. This will help us learn more about radiation that humans on the surface will experience.”

ARES would take samples of the Martian atmosphere every three minutes, helping to pinpoint the exact source of the methane plumes that have been discovered on the planet — methane on Earth is produced by living systems, but its point of origin on Mars remains a mystery. Equipped with the right instruments, the airplane also could study subsurface water and probe the ground for telltale signatures of life.

Levine first got involved with Mars airplanes in 1999. NASA’s administrator at that time, Dan Goldin, had announced a competition between various NASA centers to put a lightweight, low-cost airplane on Mars. The plan was to piggyback the chosen craft aboard an Ariane rocket launched by the French space agency CNES. The airplane flight through the Martian atmosphere was to take place on December 17, 2003 to commemorate the centennial of the Wright brothers’ first powered flight.

NASA chose the Langley Research Center team to lead the effort, with Levine as the project scientist for the mission. The project was cancelled later that year for budgetary reasons, but he has since been convinced that an airplane was the way to go for Mars exploration.

Levine believes airplanes could offer an affordable and reliable way to explore Mars. Missions such as the upcoming Mars Science Laboratory, slated for 2011, may be more difficult from a technological standpoint, he says.

“An airplane is deployed in the atmosphere,” he says, “so you don’t have to worry about landing on rough terrain or retro-rockets and firing at precise times.”

Airplanes would be ideal for observing large regions at close range, says Charles Whetsel, manager of the advanced studies and program architecture office at NASA’s Mars Exploration Directorate. To date, however, he says Mars exploration has been conducted with orbiters, landers and rovers, because they typically have long lifetimes of months to years.

The southern highlands of Mars feature erosion patterns similar to what is created by streams of flowing water on Earth. Scientists would love to explore this terrain on Mars, but the ground is too rugged for a rover to navigate. Image Credit: NASA Viking Orbiter

Indeed, Levine says ARES’ fuel would only last for a two-hour flight. But in that time it could cover close to 1500 kilometers, and after its fuel is depleted, the airplane should be able to land on the ground and continue making measurements. Besides, he stresses, airplanes would be the most reliable way to observe the planet’s rugged southern region where a rover would find it difficult if not impossible to drive.

The Langley team has successfully tested deployment and flight in the Earth’s atmosphere at a balloon facility in Tillamook, Oregon, using a half-scale ARES model. They have folded and packed the airplane into a shell and deployed from a helium balloon 30 kilometers above ground. The researchers also have done a series of wind tunnel tests to validate their predictions on how ARES would fly in the Martian atmosphere.

The ARES technology is proven on Earth, says Levine, and he is confident that a Mars mission should happen within the next decade. In fact, ARES was one of four finalists for the NASA Mars Scout mission in 2002 before the Phoenix mission was chosen.

“I feel scientifically we have a unique platform and experiment,” he says. “ARES is only the first step.”

Explore further: Habitable exoplanets are bad news for humanity

Related Stories

NASA mission asks why Mars has no atmosphere

Oct 07, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA this week gave the green light to a mission to Mars that will seek to understand why and how the red planet lost its atmosphere 3-4 billion years ago.

Recommended for you

Kazakh satellite to be launched into orbit

18 hours ago

Kazakhstan's first-ever Earth observation satellite is to be fired into orbit next week from the European spaceport in Kourou in French Guiana, launch company Arianespace said.

Habitable exoplanets are bad news for humanity

20 hours ago

Last week, scientists announced the discovery of Kepler-186f, a planet 492 light years away in the Cygnus constellation. Kepler-186f is special because it marks the first planet almost exactly the same size as Earth ...

First-of-its-kind NASA space-weather project

Apr 23, 2014

A NASA scientist is launching a one-to-two-year pilot project this summer that takes advantage of U.S. high-voltage power transmission lines to measure a phenomenon that has caused widespread power outages ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

coacher7
1 / 5 (5) Oct 08, 2010
coacher.us
HeloMenelo
1 / 5 (7) Oct 08, 2010
How about an electric chopper that can land at a base station to recharge and fly again and again.
Autonomously. Just pre-program each mission.

Or a huge solar wing/plane. You probably going to tell me that the atmosphere is not thick enough and that only rocket engines can produce the speed required to keep the e-helicopter or e-plane aloft.

You cannot tell me that it would'nt be extremely interesting if they could find a way for it to work. Maybe just compensate for the thin air by adding some serious pitch to the heli rotorblades or airplane prop.
Eikka
2.6 / 5 (5) Oct 08, 2010
Knowing how difficult helicopters are to control, there's too much to go wrong in that setup.

I would go for a weather balloon.
PPihkala
2.5 / 5 (2) Oct 08, 2010
Electrical flying apparatus poses two problems in Mars compared to Earth:
1) Thin air makes for more propulsion needed.
2) Large distance from sun makes solar panels inefficient.
Of course Mars has 1/3 the gravity of Earth so that is helping.

Weather balloon probably has issues too with thin atmosphere and then there's those Martian winds. But hydrogen filled balloon (there is less explosion risk as no oxygen in atmosphere) could work as platform for different measurements and photography.
Quantum_Conundrum
1.5 / 5 (4) Oct 08, 2010
I was thinking hydrogen filled balloon with very tiny motors or EHD thrusters (because they are so light and have no moving parts to screw up,) for maneuverability.

You would mainly just let it fly around as long as possible, and photograph "targets of opportunity". You could use the thrusters to try to get in better position, and of course to maintain orientation.
HeloMenelo
1 / 5 (5) Oct 09, 2010
let me just rephrase part of my post it sounded despicable, it was late :)

i meant to say:

"You probably going to tell me that the atmosphere is not thick enough and that only rocket engines can produce the speed required to keep an airplane aloft instead of an e-helicopter or e-plane, powering itself under it's own power."

HeloMenelo
1 / 5 (4) Oct 09, 2010
@Eikka, You'd be surprised how advanced autonomous systems have become. The helicopter can fly itself.

And one can do more precise manouvers with a heli. I am however a bit concerned about electronic interference, not too much about mechanical failure except if the dust get's in the head when on the ground, when landing and taking off, maybe they can deploy a pad on a rocky area with no sand.

Though if all this was up to me, i'd find a way to make it work under e-power, a heli or plane !

Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (2) Oct 09, 2010
What about RTG for power for the electric chopper, instead of solar or a landing pad?

Then you could basicly stay in flight till the thing breaks...
Eikka
1 / 5 (2) Oct 09, 2010
One big problem for a helicopter is that it uses significantly more energy than an airplane to maintain lift.

I know you can make a helicopter fly itself in a lab indoors, but doing it outside in the martian winds, and getting it to land back safely on its pad is a completely different challenge, and the hardware itself is quite delicate.

Nevermind the control problems, does the craft have enough power to fly back to its landing pad against a strong gust of wind?
Eikka
3 / 5 (2) Oct 09, 2010
What about RTG for power for the electric chopper, instead of solar or a landing pad?

Then you could basicly stay in flight till the thing breaks...


You could.

It would be a hopper. The weight of an RTG would prevent you from making enough continuous power, but if you allow it to land and recharge batteries for a few days, you could get it to hop from spot to spot.

Basically, it would launch high up, take a few photographs and then fall back down on the autorotation of the blades, using remaining power to smooth the landing, and then rest until it has enough juice to do it again.
kevinA
not rated yet Oct 11, 2010
Mars looks just like the worst places on earth, let's go.

More news stories

Habitable exoplanets are bad news for humanity

Last week, scientists announced the discovery of Kepler-186f, a planet 492 light years away in the Cygnus constellation. Kepler-186f is special because it marks the first planet almost exactly the same size as Earth ...

Professional and amateur astronomers join forces

(Phys.org) —Long before the term "citizen science" was coined, the field of astronomy has benefited from countless men and women who study the sky in their spare time. These amateur astronomers devote hours ...

Google+ boss leaving the company

The executive credited with bringing the Google+ social network to life is leaving the Internet colossus after playing a key role there for nearly eight years.