Young, male, testosterone-fueled CEOs more likely to start or drop deals: study

Sep 08, 2010

Too much testosterone can be a deal breaker, according to Sauder School of Business researchers at the University of British Columbia. Their paper, to be published in the INFORMS journal Management Science on September 10, shows that young CEOs with more of the steroidal hormone in their system are more likely to initiate, scrap or resist mergers and acquisitions.

The study by Sauder Finance Professors Maurice Levi and Kai Li, and PhD student Feng Zhang, titled "Deal or No Deal: Hormones and the and Acquisitions Game," shows that - a hormone associated with male dominance-seeking in competitive situations - can be a negative factor in high-stakes decision making.

"We find a strong association between male CEOs being young and their withdrawal rate of initiated mergers and acquisition," says Prof. Levi, whose research relies on the established correlation between relative youth and increased levels of testosterone.

"For instance, young CEOs, who have higher levels of testosterone, tend to reject offers even when this is against their interest."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
A podcast interview with Prof. Levi on the results of "Deal or No Deal: Hormones and the Mergers and Acquisitions Game" Credit: INFORMS

The study shows that younger CEOs operating with more testosterone in their systems are 20 per cent more likely to withdraw a merger or acquisition bid than their older counterparts. Young CEOs are also four per cent more likely to flex their managerial muscles and attempt to acquire other companies.

As well, when companies run by young male CEOs are targeted for a mergers or , there is a two-per-cent greater chance the CEOs will resist, pushing the bidder to pursue a hostile takeover that bypasses company leadership.

The researchers analyzed 350 merger and acquisition bids in the United States between 1997 and 2007, using a securities database from Thomson SDC.

The Sauder study builds on a 2007 experiment by Harvard University Economics Prof. Terence Burnham, which examined the role of testosterone in the "ultimatum game," a negotiation between two people where participants often reject offers of free money, defying standard economic rationality.

In the two-player game, subjects had to agree on how to divide 40 dollars or risk losing it all. Participants who begin with the entire sum of money could offer only five dollars or 25 dollars to their competitor.

Burnham found that, among those considering the offers, participants with higher levels of testosterone were more likely to reject what they perceived as low offers, ending up with nothing as a result.

Explore further: Insider trading study shows stronger enforcement

Related Stories

Men's testosterone levels predict competitiveness

Dec 04, 2006

After a man loses a challenge, whether or not he is willing to get back into the game depends on changes in his testosterone levels, according to new research at The University of Texas at Austin.

Recommended for you

Insider trading study shows stronger enforcement

Oct 23, 2014

The first major study of the enforcement of Australia's insider trading laws has shown the number of insider trading cases brought by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) is increasing, ...

The unexpected benefits of adjustable rate mortgages

Oct 22, 2014

Using loan level data matched to consumer credit records, researchers have been able to determine that a reduction in mortgage payments of as little as $150 a month spurred a reduction in mortgage defaults and an increase ...

Migrant employment on the rise

Oct 20, 2014

Skilled migrants are enjoying better jobs and higher levels of employment thanks to a shift in policy, according to a new study by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research at the University ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

StarDust21
5 / 5 (2) Sep 08, 2010
When will physorg understand that correlation doesn't imply causality, really...
Perhaps it is because testosterone is generally higher in young subject, and that young subjects generally have less CEO experience, that higher testosterone CEOs tend to not be as good in deal making?