New study suggests researchers can now test the 'theory of everything'

Sep 01, 2010
Researchers discover how to conduct first test of 'untestable' string theory
Professor Michael Duff FRS, lead author of the new study. Credit: Imperial College London

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers describe how to carry out the first experimental test of string theory in a paper published tomorrow in Physical Review Letters.

String theory was originally developed to describe the fundamental particles and forces that make up our universe. The new research, led by a team from Imperial College London, describes the unexpected discovery that string theory also seems to predict the behaviour of entangled quantum particles. As this prediction can be tested in the laboratory, researchers can now test string theory.

Over the last 25 years, string theory has become physicists' favourite contender for the 'theory of everything', reconciling what we know about the incredibly small from particle physics with our understanding of the very large from our studies of . Using the theory to predict how entangled quantum particles behave provides the first opportunity to test string theory by experiment.

"If experiments prove that our predictions about quantum entanglement are correct, this will demonstrate that string theory 'works' to predict the behaviour of entangled quantum systems," said Professor Mike Duff FRS, lead author of the study from the Department of Theoretical Physics at Imperial College London.

"This will not be proof that string theory is the right 'theory of everything' that is being sought by cosmologists and particle physicists. However, it will be very important to theoreticians because it will demonstrate whether or not string theory works, even if its application is in an unexpected and unrelated area of physics," added Professor Duff.

Professor Duff recalled sitting in a conference in Tasmania where a colleague was presenting the mathematical formulae that describe quantum entanglement: "I suddenly recognised his formulae as similar to some I had developed a few years earlier while using string theory to describe . When I returned to the UK I checked my notebooks and confirmed that the maths from these very different areas was indeed identical."

The discovery that string theory seems to make predictions about quantum entanglement is completely unexpected, but because quantum entanglement can be measured in the lab, it does mean that at last researchers can test predictions based on string theory. There is no obvious connection to explain why a theory that is being developed to describe the fundamental workings of our universe is useful for predicting the behaviour of entangled quantum systems. "This may be telling us something very deep about the world we live in, or it may be no more than a quirky coincidence", concluded Professor Duff. "Either way, it's useful."

String theory

String theory, and its extension M-theory, are mathematical descriptions of the universe. They have been developed, over the last 25 years, by theoreticians seeking to reconcile the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics. (The former describes the universe at the level of cosmology - the very large, while the latter describes the universe at the level of - the incredibly small). One of the major bugbears, especially of M-theory, is that it describes billions of different universes and ‘anything’ can be accommodated in one or other of the M-theory universes. Researchers have no way of testing which of the answers that string/M-theory gives us is ‘right’. Indeed, they all may be right and we live in one universe among an infinite number of universes. So far no one has been able to make a prediction, using string theory, that can be tested to see if it is correct or not.

Qubit (quantum bit) entanglement

Under very precisely controlled conditions it is possible to entangle the properties of two (two quantum bits, or qubits), for example two photons. If you then measure the state of one of these entangled particles, you immediately affect the state of its partner. And this is true if the particles are close to one another or separated by enormous distance. Hence Einstein’s apposite description of quantum entanglement as ‘spooky action at a distance’. It is possible to entangle more than two qubits, but calculating how the particles are entangled with one another becomes increasingly complex as more particles are included.

Professor Duff and his colleagues realised that the mathematical description of the pattern of entanglement between three qubits resembles the mathematical description, in string theory, of a particular class of black holes. Thus, by combining their knowledge of two of the strangest phenomena in the universe, black holes and , they realised they could use string theory to produce a prediction that could be tested. Using the mathematics that describes black holes, they predicted the pattern of entanglement that will occur when four qubits are entangled with one another. (The answer to this problem has not been calculated before.) Although it is technically difficult to do, the pattern of entanglement between four entangled qubits could be measured in the laboratory and the accuracy of this prediction tested.

Explore further: And so they beat on, flagella against the cantilever

More information: M. J. Duff FRS et al., “Four-qubit entanglement from string theory.” Physical Review Letters 2010. prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v105/i10/e100507

Related Stories

Unravelling the random fluctuations of nothing

Aug 02, 2007

The dream of theoretical physics is to unite behind a common theory that explains everything, but that goal has remained highly elusive. String theory emerged 40 years ago as one of the most promising candidates for such ...

Physical reality of string theory demonstrated

Jul 06, 2009

String theory has come under fire in recent years. Promises have been made that have not been lived up to. Leiden (The Netherlands) theoretical physicists have now for the first time used string theory to describe a physical ...

Physicists make discovery in quantum mechanics

Sep 23, 2009

(Santa Barbara, Calif.) -- Physicists at UC Santa Barbara have made an important advance in quantum mechanics using a superconducting electrical circuit. The finding is reported in this week's issue of the journal Nature.

Recommended for you

Magnetic neural control with nanoparticles

9 hours ago

Magnetic nanoparticles don't have to be "one size fits all." Instead, individual magnetic nanoparticles can be tailored in an array of differing sizes and compositions to allow for heating them separately ...

User comments : 54

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

blownfuse
1.8 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
this discussion, and the recent discussion of reactions of radioactive materials on earth responding to solar activity suggest to me that an entanglement experiment might be devised around the solar activity and the radioactive materials response.
Just_some_guy
Sep 01, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Honor
2.4 / 5 (7) Sep 01, 2010
maybe the similarities between the string theory equation and the entanglement equation has something to do with the holographic principle.
Sirinx
1.4 / 5 (12) Sep 01, 2010
..string theory is the right 'theory of everything' ..
String theory considers constant speed of light and existence of extra-dimensions, which will manifest just with violation of constant speed of light. The confirmation of one of postulates will render the second one unusable.

Not too good start for every "right theory of everything".
frajo
4 / 5 (9) Sep 01, 2010
So far no one has been able to make a prediction, using string theory, that can be tested to see if it is correct or not.
If I understand Steinhardt's/Turok's ekpyrotic/cyclic model correctly, it predicts a certain polarization pattern of the microwave background which is quite different from what the commonly preferred inflation hypothesis predicts. Their model is based on string theory.
Sirinx
2.2 / 5 (13) Sep 01, 2010
..The discovery that string theory seems to make predictions about quantum entanglement is completely unexpected..
Because of insintric inconsistency of string theory postulates above explained string theory predicts a huge landscape of possible solutions, about 10E+500 solutions or so...

http://en.wikiped...andscape

So that any experimental proof of string theory would remain valid only for this particular solution, thus leaving string theory unfalsifiable. Actually string theory was proven wrong already in different experiments, trying to detect the presence of extradimensions. Another predictions of string theory (existence of cosmic strings and/or primordial micro-black black holes) failed as well...

http://www.scient...tra-dime
MaxwellsDemon
3.7 / 5 (9) Sep 01, 2010
String theory has been like a bad marriage: 20 years of empty promises and a closet full of pretty dresses, and now the only thing lower than my expectations is my credit rating. I'd love to see it all pay off in a blaze of fireworks, but I think there's a better chance that my dog will grow wings and fly home to Momma.
Hesperos
4.2 / 5 (11) Sep 01, 2010
Coincidence or connection? It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
wsbriggs
1.4 / 5 (5) Sep 01, 2010
Now to get Physicists to start thinking about non-simply interconnected surfaces and black holes in earnest.

"Strings are the threads that multi-dimensional Hansels & Gretels use to avoid the wicked witches of the stellar abyss." Hans Krystian Andresson.
Xaero
1 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
String theory ties us in knots:

http://www.abc.ne...7489.htm

"..It's time to stop searching for a grand plan that explains the Universe and accept that Nature is imperfect", argues Professor Marcelo Gleiser.

Very, very imperfect, I'd say...
TabulaMentis
1.8 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
So far no one has been able to make a prediction, using string theory, that can be tested to see if it is correct or not.
If I understand Steinhardt's/Turok's ekpyrotic/cyclic model correctly, it predicts a certain polarization pattern of the microwave background which is quite different from what the commonly preferred inflation hypothesis predicts. Their model is based on string theory.

Big Bang - Big Crunch models are great. Mix in a little holographic principle and away we go. A new CMB test would be wonderful.
Vibrating strings contain bytes of information that work well with entangled quantum systems. It is getting close to Halloween, so there is nothing better than a little spooky action going on around this time of the year.
Is this article saying some black holes have qutrit centers? Wow, wouldn't it be interesting if that were found to be true. Maybe the Borgs already have us under their control?
gurloc
4 / 5 (6) Sep 01, 2010
Is it certain that there is actually a test of string philosophy here (to be string 'theory' it would actually have to be testable)? This article makes it sound more like two systems that coincidentally can be solved with the same mathematical framework, that doesn't necessarily mean they are part of the same physics theory.
Xaero
2 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
Here's another take on this announcement. Author has no idea how this paper is supposed to contain a "test" of string theory....

http://www.math.c.../?p=3127
gold2_718
4.1 / 5 (7) Sep 01, 2010
I wish the PhysOrg editors would think a bit instead of just putting press releases on site. First, we can only test string theory if we have a different prediction from quantum mechanics (or quantum field theory) and the string theory get the right answer experimentally. Second, just because they say it is the first test of string theory doesn't mean it is. Predictions for deviations from expected results due to the effects of some kinds of string theory go back years. For instance, see: Patrick Meade, Lisa Randall, "Black Holes and Quantum Gravity at the LHC", (2007) http://lanl.arxiv...708.3017 and similar papers.
TabulaMentis
2.6 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
@gold2_718

As you may well know, Lisa Randall talks about an interesting theory she calls a GRAVITYBRANE in a book titled WARPED PASSAGES written by her and someone else.

It does sound a little bit like a press release. The article is like a trial balloon or throwing something against the wall to see if it will stick.
gold2_718
4.3 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
@TabulaMentis
Lisa Randall is the only author in "Warped Passages" (I have a copy on my shelf). In her research papers (a bit denser than the book :-), she calculated the effect of the of the high energy collisions at the LHC for the case where our universe has more than three large dimensions and we are stuck in three by Branes. She found that the particles would experience exponentially-higher gravity as they tried to move out of the three-dimensional space and showed what the effect would look like to the particle trackers. I call this a clear prediction for a scientific test of one form of string theory -- the first in more than 30 years of research. It is better than the 'test' in this article because there are already predictions for the results if the extra dimensions do not exist.
Truth
2.8 / 5 (5) Sep 01, 2010
blownfuse, the experiment you suggested is in fact being researched at various solar research labs, among others. While no one yet knows if there is any correlation, it is good to see that your desire to expand research in unexpected ways is alive and well in many physicists. Treat any low-level critique as exactly that, low-level.
Truth
4.1 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
String theory ties us in knots:

"..It's time to stop searching for a grand plan that explains the Universe and accept that Nature is imperfect", argues Professor Marcelo Gleiser.

Very, very imperfect, I'd say...


Wow, Xaero, if people thought like you did, we'd all still be living in the forests, eating grubs and sacrificing turtles to the Tree-God....
getgoa
1 / 5 (16) Sep 01, 2010
String Theory is very simply explained in the bible, that all light including the stories written in the bible all define distance and light for all sciences.

The same is true for deciphering the bible with math equations as seen on history documentaries what goes up must come down--like Copernicus found a truth that encompassed the whole world and everything in it and Isaac Newton's gravity is another example. The biblical example following this line of thinking is found here:

Ecclesiastes 3:17 found phrase
And I said in my heart: God shall judge both the just and the wicked, and then shall be the time of every thing.

Think about it--generation x is wicked and Jesus in the light of thinking was among thieves who did not want to get judged and so this phrase is true:
Proverbs 21:7 found 4
The robberies of the wicked shall be their down
Xaero
1.5 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
In "just-3D" space the light would spread with constant (invariant) speed according to relativity. If some extra-dimensions will be present, this principle will not be valid anymore. So do you believe in light speed invariance - or rather in existence of extra-dimensions, which would violate it? String theory believes in both of them - it uses both assumptions as a part of its axioms, i.e. postulates from its very beginning.

It's not a rocket physics at all, but it's difficult to express it with formal math - which is why string theorists missed this controversy completely.

Actually there is one special situation, which still enables string theory working. The microwaves of cosmic background noise are spreading in invariant speed and they're violating the dimensionality of space-time in subtle way. Therefore these two postulates of string theory are fulfilled just for CMB noise, which explains the huge landscape of string theory solutions derived.
gold2_718
2 / 5 (3) Sep 01, 2010
@Truth, Hey, are you still sore that the Tree-God likes turtles? :-)
@getgoa, Godwin thanks you
TabulaMentis
2.4 / 5 (8) Sep 01, 2010
@getgoa

You need to better than that, show us some science!

How did Moses part the sea?
How did Jesus walk on water?
How does the New Jerusalem fly?
getgoa
1 / 5 (11) Sep 01, 2010
Science is from the bible the answer to any of the questions is light--the same light as described in the bible, think of it as a proof with a given.
TabulaMentis
2.3 / 5 (6) Sep 01, 2010
@getgoa

We need more data!

Here is an example, please see the following link:

http://bible.cc/r...1-16.htm

The link provides math, shapes, values. This way we have an idea of what the New Jerusalem UFO will look like.
Xaero
1.7 / 5 (12) Sep 01, 2010
..if people thought like you did, we'd all still be living in the forests, eating grubs and sacrificing turtles...
If we'll continue in the current formal way of thinking, we will end in the same way - soon or later.
tkjtkj
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 01, 2010
Is it certain that there is actually a test of string philosophy here (to be string 'theory' it would actually have to be testable)? This article makes it sound more like two systems that coincidentally can be solved with the same mathematical framework, that doesn't necessarily mean they are part of the same physics theory.


Your point was mentioned by the authors:
""This may be telling us something very deep about the world we live in, or it may be no more than a quirky coincidence", concluded Professor Duff. "Either way, it's useful."
rjm1percent
1.7 / 5 (3) Sep 01, 2010
No doubt future generations will look back on us like we do the flat-earthers, and think, 'what the hell were they thinking?'
ElasfarSovereign
1.8 / 5 (4) Sep 01, 2010
String Theory is very simply explained in the bible, that all light including the stories written in the bible all define distance and light for all sciences.

The same is true for deciphering the bible with math equations as seen on history documentaries what goes up must come down--like Copernicus found a truth that encompassed the whole world and everything in it and Isaac Newton's gravity is another example. The biblical example following this line of thinking is found here:

Ecclesiastes 3:17 found phrase
And I said in my heart: God shall judge both the just and the wicked, and then shall be the time of every thing.

Think about it--generation x is wicked and Jesus in the light of thinking was among thieves who did not want to get judged and so this phrase is true:
Proverbs 21:7 found 4
The robberies of the wicked shall be their down


Umm...WoW! o.o You're kidding right???
JIMBO
2 / 5 (4) Sep 01, 2010
Bottom Line: If anybody deserves to see string theory validated in their lifetime, its Mike Duff, a great physicist & quintessential gentleman.
I'm pulling for him & the stringers to finally knock one out of the park.
questioner
1 / 5 (1) Sep 02, 2010
isnt the definition of a dimension, a degree (new/diferent) of freedom ... huh one of u smart guys ? so why does light need to be effected at all by another dimension.. give me the science which u smart ones throw around in ur links im hungry to learn and plan to do a doctrite in physics when im older so... gota start somewhere.. i just dont see if a dimension is intrinsic like that what the bleep video shows.. then it doesnt have to interact with lights constant speed ?
hodzaa
1.6 / 5 (7) Sep 02, 2010
The definition of dimension can be understood with the water surface model of space-time. This surface is essentially two dimensional, because it enables waves to propagate in many possible directions, two of which are always independent mutually. Technically speaking it's the number of degree of motion freedom for particles, mediating the surface waves.

Note that the third dimension of water surface plays a role of temporal dimension, which is perpendicular to remaining spatial dimensions. As such it's always defined by direction of density gradient at water surface, i.e. it has an "arrow" with compare to spatial directions. The transverse waves cannot spread in time direction, as they can penetrate the underwater in limited way only.

If we imagine the gravity field of massive body like density gradient of vacuum, then the time dimension will be perpendicular to surface of this body. This enables us to travel in time around massive body in limited extent - not only in space.
hodzaa
1.6 / 5 (7) Sep 02, 2010
While being fuzzy mixture of mutually contradicting subtheories, some basic ideas of string theory aren't wrong - they're quite insightful instead. Which is why physicists are dealing with string theory so obstinately.

At first, it's a concept of extradimensions, which is as great, as misunderstood in context of physics. It's misunderstood, because extradimensions are all around us. The well known cosmic background noise violates dimensionality of 4D space-time in the same way, like the various short distance forces: the dipole force, van der Waals forces, Casimir force, etc. The force constant of these forces violates the inverse square law, i.e. the dimensionality of space-time, in which they're spreading. For example Casimir force is indirectly proportional to fifth power of distance at the case of spherical objects, so it's effectively spreading in six dimensions.

If string theorists would be more insightful, they would use Casimir force or CMB as an arguments for ST already.
hodzaa
1.6 / 5 (7) Sep 02, 2010
It was mainly the concentration of grants and money, which has made string theory so relatively rich to various concepts - not the ideas of string theory itself. Many of equations derived there have actually nothing to do with string theory postulates - they were formed by combination of quantum mechanic, relativity and new concepts borrowed from another theories.

Other concepts, like the supersymmetry or AdS/CFT duality are as good, as the concept of extradimensions, but they're not specific to string theory. Supersymmetry was proposed originally in context of QED, so it cannot serve as an argument of string theory validity. AdS/CFT duality was applied to string theory first, but it's concept of holographic principle actually and as such it was applied to another theories as well - so it cannot serve as a conclusive evidence of string theory, too. The same is true about usage of various gauge groups in so-called heterotic string theories.
questioner
2 / 5 (4) Sep 02, 2010
hodza u wrote> Technically speaking it's the number of degree of motion freedom for particles, mediating the surface waves
thats like what i was saying isnt it.. diferent and intrinsic motions of freedom, i think i understand the dimensions "higher dimension" .. i am a novice physicist as u saw me reference the what the bleep dvd set LOL .. we basically said the same thing diferently i rekon. have u seen the example on "what the bleep do we know, down the rabbit hole" that im talking about... ANYWAY .. whats string theory got to do with quantum entanglement .. oh yeh the top scientists just overlooked that one did they! hahaha wtf

(how do u guys do that light writing like what some one else has just said the indented style)
CSharpner
1 / 5 (1) Sep 02, 2010
@getgoa

You need to better than that, show us some science!

How did Moses part the sea?
How did Jesus walk on water?
How does the New Jerusalem fly?

tabula... i apologize for accidentally voting a 1 on your response. i meant to vote 5. :(
CSharpner
1 / 5 (2) Sep 02, 2010
Umm...WoW! o.o You're kidding right???

ELASFAR...
SAME APOLOGY TO YOU. I ACCIDENTALLY MARKED YOUR RESPONSE WITH A 1 WHEN I MEANT 5. I VOTED SO MANY DOWN, MY THUMB AUTOMATICALLY WENT FOR THE ONE STAR INSTEAD OF THE 5TH. ALSO, SORRY FOR ALL CAPS... SOMETHING SCREWY WITH MY PHONE.
CSharpner
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 02, 2010
im hungry to learn and plan to do a doctrite in physics when im older so... gota start somewhere..

Questioner, please start with using punctuation, caps, and avoiding shorthand. Aside from that, I'm glad you've chosen to pursue the sciences. God speed to you.
SteveL
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 03, 2010
Umm...WoW! o.o You're kidding right???

ELASFAR...
SAME APOLOGY TO YOU. I ACCIDENTALLY MARKED YOUR RESPONSE WITH A 1 WHEN I MEANT 5. I VOTED SO MANY DOWN, MY THUMB AUTOMATICALLY WENT FOR THE ONE STAR INSTEAD OF THE 5TH. ALSO, SORRY FOR ALL CAPS... SOMETHING SCREWY WITH MY PHONE.


Were you actually reading the posts before voting on them? Or, do you get a Pavlovian vote 1 response when you see posts with certain names? I noticed some posters seem to elicit that response.
Drew_L
Sep 03, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
michaelick
2.5 / 5 (4) Sep 04, 2010
I'm not sure who said this, probably Murray Gell-Mann, but I'm not sure, however I read that there never will be a theory of everything since quantum mechanics show us the statistical nature of our world. A theory of everything would mean that we can predict all future phenomena given enough information of the present moment. However, even with the string theory it is not the case and thus there will be things we can not predict. That's why it's not a theory of everything.
JIMBO
1 / 5 (3) Sep 04, 2010
You Dummies ! You let that christer sucker you into debating science v. religulousness.
Shame on U !
Musashi
3.5 / 5 (6) Sep 04, 2010
How nice that all this religious nonsense is NOT considered pointless verbiage... gotta love these moderator criteria...
getgoa
Sep 05, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
getgoa
1 / 5 (7) Sep 05, 2010
String Theory is in the bible-muck like other comments I have written on psychology that prove jesus of Sirach is the true person or reference for the research.
Ravenrant
2.3 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2010
Luckily for religious people the Bible explains EVERYTHING. Why not? It has to or none of it is true. Countless theologians have studied the Bible, and lost their religion as a result after learning the numerous inconsistencies and contradictions in it. Why? Because it's supposed to be the word of God and it should be perfect.

The other side of the coin are the fools who think string theory is correct. Hidden dimensions? Not happening. Guess again.
frajo
4.3 / 5 (6) Sep 06, 2010
The other side of the coin are the fools who think string theory is correct. Hidden dimensions? Not happening.
You have scientific evidence which disproves string theory? Highly interesting.
genastropsychicallst
2 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2010
http://www.physor...92.html: Variation in fine structure constant suggest laws of physics not(?) the same everywhere.
Sirinx
1 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2010
You have scientific evidence which disproves string theory? Highly interesting.

Yes, for example there... Physicists have searched for new forces predicted by string theory to exist in extra dimensions, but found nothing:

http://physicswor...ws/17025
http://physicswor...ws/29972
Skeptic_Heretic
4.2 / 5 (5) Sep 07, 2010
You have scientific evidence which disproves string theory? Highly interesting.

Yes, for example there... Physicists have searched for new forces predicted by string theory to exist in extra dimensions, but found nothing:

http://physicswor...ws/17025

Statements of constraining values are not statements of absence.
daywalk3r
3.9 / 5 (18) Sep 07, 2010
I read that there never will be a theory of everything since quantum mechanics show us the statistical nature of our world.
A statistical approach is, what it is.

It's more a matter of how much car accident statistics can tell about the cause of car accidents. Some have accepted that there simply is no explainable cause, or that we will never be able to determine it.

Then they decided to throw a party in Coppenhagen, and rest is history :)

A theory of everything would mean that we can predict all future phenomena given enough information of the present moment.
And what if "enough" would equal "infinite"?

We would need infinite processing capabilities to make an infinitely precise prediction. So setting a scope/resolution would always be mandatory in every prediction/simulation. This in essence limits our prediction accuracy to finite values, regardless of level of our understanding of the Universe, unless infinite processing capabilities are a possibility.
getgoa
1 / 5 (4) Sep 07, 2010
strange thing mentioning contradictions because everyone should know the English are the most contradictory human beings on this planet.

The English have brought down light from the beginning of time according to the bible and so how can it not be a wonder now that the theory of everything can be tested?

People should know that the light of the bible has written in it consequences of stars it is called Deutoronomy something the english can smell rather than hear.

The english are paralelling in the light of the bible the same story of Egypt for cheating famine--so instead of agreeing with 2012 they agree with 2060.
getgoa
1 / 5 (4) Sep 07, 2010
This theory if reading from the bible is the observation of letting a stranger in and being turned out like a whirlwind.

Ecclesiasticus 11:36
Receive a stranger in, and he shall overthrow thee with a whirlwind, and shall turn thee out of thy own.

I will never let the English in so forget it.
Skeptic_Heretic
1 / 5 (2) Sep 07, 2010
I will never let the English in so forget it.
Funny how you forget the statements of Lot's story.

To defend visitors with greater vigor than you will defend your offspring.
yyz
4 / 5 (4) Sep 07, 2010
@getgoa (& alizee),

"so instead of agreeing with 2012 they agree with 2060."

Seems a paper was posted at arXiv today( http://arxiv.org/...74v1.pdf ) that specifically looks at the possibility of a massive body entering the solar system over the next couple of years (specifically to cover up thru 2012) and upsetting Earth in its' orbit.

From the abstract; "It turns out that the orbit of the Earth would not be macroscopically altered by a close (0.2 au) passage of such an ultrafast body X in the next 2 yr. On the contrary, our planet would be hurled into the space if a Sun-sized body X would encounter it by moving at v/c = 10E-4. On the other hand, this would imply that such a X should be now at just 20-30 au, contrary to all direct observational and indirect dynamical evidences."

The author notes that the strategy outlined can be extended for any temporal interval and dates so as to head off similar future doomsday predictions! Planet X take note. o_O
hodzaa
1 / 5 (3) Sep 08, 2010
It turns out that the orbit of the Earth would not be macroscopically altered by a close (0.2 au) passage of such an ultrafast body X in the next 2 yr.
We aren't talking about ultrafast body. And the path of many asteroids is affected already. This is sufficient to make enough troubles for us even without pronounced influencing the path of Earth planet as such.

http://www.techno...iv/25191
benrot
1 / 5 (4) Sep 08, 2010
has science(modern!)become some sort of religion?
If the sun is a molecule of water then the earth would be an electron! of course in macrocosmos, where everything is going much faster, so we have an exstremly short life, the duration of the BB?
Could this allow us to maybe change things, to try to slow things down, it is going much to fast.
Our thoughts are moving with the speed of very fast,to be in contact with the cosmos,but some people are defaced, not living in the same world it seems.
There is of course an interaction between everything in one way or the other, it is not possible to isolate something compleetly from the rest of it should it be the isolationbox or magnetic field.
Since hubblesite informed having mesured the radiation comming from dark matter, said that due to that the dark matter have an age of 3 trillions of years and that the let go of only antimatter(repulsion?), this antimatter glued together, came to a critical mass,imploded,exploded,the BB a short
ChiRaven
5 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2010
Nothing quite like a discussion of quantum physics and string theory to bring out the squirrels, is there?