A new way to weigh planets

Aug 24, 2010
The Sun, Earth and Jupiter orbit a common barycentre. Image credit - D. Champion, MPIfR

An international CSIRO-led team of astronomers has developed a new way to weigh the planets in our Solar System - using radio signals from the small spinning stars called pulsars.

“This is first time anyone has weighed entire planetary systems - with their moons and rings,” said team leader Dr David Champion from Germany’s Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie.

“And we’ve provided an independent check on previous results, which is great for planetary science.”

Measurements of planet masses made this new way could feed into data needed for future space missions.

Until now, astronomers have weighed planets by measuring the orbits of their moons or of spacecraft flying past them. That’s because creates gravity, and a planet’s gravitational pull determines the orbit of anything that goes around it - both the size of the orbit and how long it takes to complete.

The new method is based on corrections astronomers make to signals from pulsars - small spinning stars that deliver regular ‘blips’ of .

The Earth is travelling around the Sun, and this movement affects exactly when pulsar signals arrive here.

To remove this effect, astronomers calculate when the pulses would have arrived at the Solar System’s centre of mass, or barycentre, around which all the planets orbit.

Because the arrangement of the planets around the Sun changes all the time, the barycentre moves around too.

To work out its position, astronomers use both a table (called an ephemeris) of where all the planets are at a given time, and the values for their masses that have already been measured.

CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science (CASS) researcher, Dr Dick Manchester, says that if these figures are slightly wrong, and the position of the barycentre is slightly wrong, then a regular, repeating pattern of timing errors appears in the pulsar data.

“For instance, if the mass of and its moons is wrong, we see a pattern of timing errors that repeats over 12 years, the time Jupiter takes to orbit the Sun,” Dr Manchester said.

“But if the mass of Jupiter and its moons is corrected, the timing errors disappear. This is the feedback process that the astronomers have used to determine the planets’ masses.”

Data from a set of four pulsars have been used to weigh Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn with their moons and rings. Most of these data were recorded by CSIRO’s Parkes radio telescope in eastern Australia, with some contributed by the Arecibo telescope in Puerto Rico and the Effelsberg telescope in Germany.

The masses were consistent with those measured by spacecraft. The mass of the Jovian system, 9.547921(2) x 10-4 times the mass of the Sun, is significantly more accurate than the mass determined from the Pioneer and Voyager spacecraft, and consistent with, but less accurate than, the value from the Galileo spacecraft.

The new measurement technique is sensitive to a mass difference of two hundred thousand million million tonnes - just 0.003 per cent of the mass of the Earth, and one ten-millionth of Jupiter’s mass.

CASS scientist Dr George Hobbs says that, in the short term, spacecraft will continue to make the most accurate measurements for individual planets.

”But the pulsar technique will be the best for planets not being visited by spacecraft, and for measuring the combined masses of planets and their moons,” Dr Hobbs said,

Repeating the measurements would improve the values even more. If astronomers observed a set of 20 pulsars over seven years they’d weigh Jupiter more accurately than spacecraft have. Doing the same for Saturn would take 13 years.

The head of the ‘Fundamental Physics in Radio Astronomy’ research group at the Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Professor Michael Kramer, says need this accurate timing because they are using pulsars to hunt for gravitational waves predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

“Finding these waves depends on spotting minute changes in the timing of pulsar signals, and so all other sources of timing error must be accounted for, including the traces of Solar System planets,” Professor Kramer said.

Explore further: Smallest known galaxy with a supermassive black hole found

More information: "Measuring the mass of Solar-System planets using pulsar timing" - D.J. Champion et al. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal.

Related Stories

Wobbly planets could reveal Earth-like moons

Dec 11, 2008

Moons outside our Solar System with the potential to support life have just become much easier to detect, thanks to research by an astronomer at University College London (UCL).

'Hot Jupiter' planets unlikely to have moons

Aug 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Planets of the major type so far found outside our solar system are unlikely to have moons, according to new research reported in the August 20 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Brown Dwarfs Beaming Like Pulsars

Apr 18, 2007

Brown dwarfs, thought just a few years ago to be incapable of emitting any significant amounts of radio waves, have been discovered putting out extremely bright "lighthouse beams" of radio waves, much like ...

Richest planetary system discovered (w/ Video)

Aug 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using ESO's world-leading HARPS instrument have discovered a planetary system containing at least five planets, orbiting the Sun-like star HD 10180. The researchers also have tantalising ...

Increasing the odds of the sweep

Oct 04, 2006

Using ESO's Very Large Telescope, astronomers have confirmed the extrasolar planet status of two of the 16 candidates discovered by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. One of the two confirmed exoplanets has ...

Astronomers weigh 'recycled' millisecond pulsar

Jan 12, 2006

A team of U.S. and Australian astronomers is announcing today that they have, for the first time, precisely measured the mass of a millisecond pulsar -- a tiny, dead star spinning hundreds of times every second. ...

Recommended for you

Mystery of rare five-hour space explosion explained

20 hours ago

Next week in St. Petersburg, Russia, scientists on an international team that includes Penn State University astronomers will present a paper that provides a simple explanation for mysterious ultra-long gamma-ray ...

Glowing galaxies in telescopic timelapse

20 hours ago

We often speak of the discoveries and data flowing from astronomical observatories, which makes it easy to forget the cool factor. Think of it—huge telescopes are probing the universe under crystal-clear ...

Violent origins of disc galaxies probed by ALMA

Sep 17, 2014

For decades scientists have believed that galaxy mergers usually result in the formation of elliptical galaxies. Now, for the the first time, researchers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Parsec
not rated yet Aug 24, 2010
If the pulsar signal passed close to another massive object that in turn was moving or had a varying center of mass, then after all of the corrections to the pulsar signal would leave a residual signal. Sounds like yet another mechanism to find the rare objects/ solar systems that are line of sight to existing pulsars. They would not necessarily be visible if the star were low mass enough and the pulsar was far enough away. But the effects on the signal could be significant if the system were close enough to line of sight.

I wonder if pulsars amplified by gravitational lenses could show the same effects? All kinds of cool observations are possible once the local effects are all canceled out.
DamienS
Aug 25, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
genastropsychicallst
1 / 5 (5) Aug 25, 2010
… ever is uneven any weighing but never was not even one weighest unever, bey quadrate. Mean, all weighes are always without theory because with practum is also not the real weigh …

Eached daily readers from 1 second until sometimes 10 hours on my site, titel 'codeglobal'.
hodzaa
1 / 5 (4) Aug 25, 2010
..because the arrangement of the planets around the Sun changes all the time, the barycentre moves around too..
In my opinion the location of barycentre switches the plasma stream beneath Sun surface with Coriolis force, thus causing the eleven years standing periods of solar activity. At recent time this periodicity was affected with approaching cloud of interstellar gas, which keeps the Sun in quiet.

http://www.billho...arvatova solar inertial motion & activity/Charvatova, Hejda Aug08 - A possible role of the solar inertial motion in climatic changes.pdf
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Aug 25, 2010
In my opinion the location of barycentre switches the plasma stream beneath Sun surface with Coriolis force, thus causing the eleven years standing periods of solar activity.
That isn't a reasonable assertion. The periodicity of the outer, heavier planets would stand in stark contrast to an formulae you could divine from this thought process. If the solar cycle was far longer, you may have had a point, then again, we don't know enough about the sun to determine if there are in effect longer cycles at play. Without subsequent observation we can only say "perhaps" in response to your hypothesis.

@ the article:

How exactly are they removing the noise introduced by dark matter, interstellar dust clouds, magnetic interaction, and of course the use fo the term barycenter is utterly incorrect without determining the state and nature of non-baryonic matter.