US demands WikiLeaks return military documents

Aug 05, 2010
The homepage of the WikiLeaks.org website is seen on a computer after leaked classified military documents were posted to in July, 2010. The Pentagon on Thursday demanded that the whistleblower website "return immediately" leaked US military documents after the site released tens of thousands of secret files.

The Pentagon on Thursday demanded that the whistleblower website WikiLeaks "return immediately" leaked US military documents after the site released tens of thousands of secret files.

"The Defense Department demands that Wikileaks return immediately to the all versions of documents obtained directly or indirectly from the Department of Defense databases or records," said Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell.

The website's disclosure "of a large number of our documents has already threatened the safety of our troops, our allies and Afghan citizens who are working with us to help bring about peace and stability in that part of the world," he said.

"The only acceptable course is for to take steps immediately to return all versions of all of these documents to the US government and permanently delete them from its website, computers and records."

Explore further: Google to help boost Greece's tourism industry

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US soldier arrested in WikiLeaks case

Jun 07, 2010

A US soldier in Iraq has been arrested for allegedly leaking classified information to whistleblower website WikiLeaks, including video of a helicopter strike in Baghdad and US diplomatic cables.

Recommended for you

Fitbit to Schumer: We don't sell personal data

45 minutes ago

The maker of a popular line of wearable fitness-tracking devices says it has never sold personal data to advertisers, contrary to concerns raised by U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer.

Should you be worried about paid editors on Wikipedia?

5 hours ago

Whether you trust it or ignore it, Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world and accessed by millions of people every day. So would you trust it any more (or even less) if you knew people ...

Philippines makes arrests in online extortion ring

6 hours ago

Philippine police have arrested eight suspected members of an online syndicate accused of blackmailing more than 1,000 Hong Kong and Singapore residents after luring them into exposing themselves in front of webcam, an official ...

Google to help boost Greece's tourism industry

18 hours ago

Internet giant Google will offer management courses to 3,000 tourism businesses on the island of Crete as part of an initiative to promote the sector in Greece, industry union Sete said on Thursday.

Music site SoundCloud to start paying artists

Aug 21, 2014

SoundCloud said Thursday that it will start paying artists and record companies whose music is played on the popular streaming site, a move that will bring it in line with competitors such as YouTube and Spotify.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fmfbrestel
5 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2010
Um, freedom of the press? The leaker violated federal law, Wikileaks broke no law. So they intentionally have no way to identify their sources, is that against the law? If you actually visit the site, you will see leaked CIA documents discussing the need to "destroy" wikileaks. Could you imagine the outrage if the US government was caught contemplating the 'destruction' of the New York Times or Washington Post?
fmfbrestel
not rated yet Aug 05, 2010
If wikileaks can get their hands on such dangerous documents can you imagine what a determined foreign agency could get? Maybe the pentagon should be more concerned about their internal security then trying to shake down the media.
TabulaMentis
not rated yet Aug 05, 2010
I wonder if the FBI is willing to return the video of the young girls undressing?

Link:
http://www.breitb...97MF9I00

The future looks quite dim until people are able get their perverted spying habits under control.
TabulaMentis
not rated yet Aug 06, 2010
Um, freedom of the press? The leaker violated federal law, Wikileaks broke no law. So they intentionally have no way to identify their sources, is that against the law? If you actually visit the site, you will see leaked CIA documents discussing the need to "destroy" wikileaks. Could you imagine the outrage if the US government was caught contemplating the 'destruction' of the New York Times or Washington Post?

Do you not think a confidential global court of some kind would be a better place to expose leaked documents instead of posting them unanimously on a Web site for all to see? Privacy is an issue that should be taken more seriously!